>>33524 Lolno. I WILL NOT EAT ZE BUGS! <---> Somebody need to do a mashup with BB=The evil, bald, jewish Globohomo guy. :D

>Alway Rember ol' frens, Anon... :^) -/doll/ - currently at https://anon.cafe/doll/ - impeccable artistry in dolljoints. KIA -/robo/ - currently at https://junkuchan.org/robo/ - robot girls NSFW. Ecchi metallic derrieres. (Merged w/ /origin/ ) -/workbench/ - currently at https://anon.cafe/workbench/ - building robots is fun! KIA

>>42715 I still thought there was some doubt since that robot doesn't have the finishing touches, but here's someone literally unzipping the backside of the female form factor robot. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DdzDKJnu63c When you get up that close, the robot is a little loud. Not a problem for industrial applications or even just a cleaner-bot, but for something you want to cuddle with, it's not ideal. Probably the first thing they're going to want to fix.

>>42726 POTD >>42729 Don't worry, Anon. Sound-deadening & other optimizations will come. The fact its this quiet and can stand and walk reliably today is already amazing! TWAGMI

>>42729 Nice video find! The fact that me and others thought it was just a costume, and he had to disprove that, is incredibly astonishing. >but for something you want to cuddle with, it's not ideal. Probably the first thing they're going to want to fix. (me who slept with the 3D printer on) "Coward..."

>>42729 I was thinking, "They got a really good body movement actor with some very good breathing control." Clearly I was wrong.

>>42421 Agreed.

>>42662 ai slop

>>42663 the future is now old man

>>42666 >satan trips says all I need to know

>>42692 I made a smaller version for posting on 4chan

>>42707 Actually, I'm very-inclined to agree with such sentiments in regards to #2 & #3. Please don't post this kind of stuff here, Anon. I think we've been over this before. If (for whatever reason) you're inclined to uncover the nature of such reprobate degenerates here on our board, please figure out a way to do so without images of them/cast them in a """positive""" light. I was just eating and now my stomach is turned having seen your post. TIA.

>>42692 >>42711 Other than the size change, is there a difference?

>>42712 I'm posting it as an expose I found on an anti-AI person. I made sure to spoil it because it was shocking. Ultimately, for our waifus to succeed, we need to expose the rabid anti-ai element for what it is, a group of degenerate leftists mad they're getting less commissions on their furry art. It's good that you agree with #2 and #3, most people should, and I do not trust anyone who doesn't. Anyway, think of the post as an export hub for others to send it to other places. >>42713 No

New meme. Good for MGTOW/Manosphere places

>>41771 didn't see the new thread lol

>>41772 I guess FNAF counts if you include toy chica https://youtu.be/P1O9OEf6PaY?si=nras07TXqRgifvKe

>>41777 i was thinking of security breach actually, also checked

wife

Umamusume has a mind upload robowaifu, Sugar Lights, and her robot avatar ST-2. Kinda strange for a somewhat grounded universe. https://youtube.com/shorts/x2eEbBN61rk https://umamusu.wiki/Sugar_Lights https://umamusu.wiki/ST-2

>>42627 There's /g/, anywhere else?

It appears XLeRobot has got a few upgrades. https://github.com/Vector-Wangel/XLeRobot

>>42638 POTD I'll look into this closely GreerTech, since Cart Waifu is my general design goal at this stage. Cheers, Anon. :^)

ClosedAI is bound to fail. ClosedAI is super incompetent, the only reason they are still successful is because of being the first big player and being the AWS of AI. They swallow funding like a black hole, while getting beat out by other competitors. Most of their consumer operations are still unprofitable, and their updates are unpopular in the AI scene. You can tell they're getting desperate, DeepSeek kicked their ass a few months ago on the general chatbot scene, and Grok is catching up with visuals. Even Sam's stock market boyfriend is losing hope. It is gleeful to see them about to fail, but considering how much the US economy is propped up by AI, it also scares me.

https://youtu.be/4Zi3jVfKjyA Don’t know if you can trust the Chinese here but the more exposure robowaifus have the better.

>>42677 Young earth creationists are going have to explain circular DNA of plastids and the mitochondia as well as human chromosome 2. These are the strongest points for evolution, but I don't think evolution is incompatible with Christianity.

>>42699 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbiogenesis

>>42699 True, great point Riboss. BTW, there are hundreds of other systemic issues with their hottake. BTW, none of the organizations I've linked to are YEC -adherents. I'm not attempting to speak for anyone else here but just myself alone: I personally consider the YEC claims to be extraordinarily-harmful ones concerning the endeavor of Christian Evangelism. There is literally no evangelistic value in their positions. At all. While God won't lose any of His own in the end (preaching the Gospel even after death for those who would believe) [1], this has ravaged countless millions from living a full life in Christ, simply through (reasonable, IMO) offense at YEC's adamant (and non-biblical) take on the age of the universe. B/c (((reasons))), they have managed to spread this mindvirus far-and-wide in the West today...posturing themselves in the media as the """one-and-only-Christian-worldview""". Thankfully its actually a rather new concept (~150yrs now), and hasn't plagued most of human history. Only subsequent to Darwin's "On the Origin of Species..." has it come into being (and directly in an attempted-response to it). I love them as fellow Christians, but I strongly-oppose their position on this set of topics. As @GreerTech implicated before (though on other terms): "To deny physical evidence is fallacy" (cf. >>42651 ). They are attempting to claim that God's second "book" [2] has no authenticity or merit at all compared to biblical scripture (yet spend vast amounts of their considerable resources examining said 2nd book in an attempt to "hogtie" it with their presuppositions, lol). This is actually a very deep fallacy IMO. It simultaneously impugns both God's handiworks, as well as His moral character... as if He could contradict Himself in any way (ie, lie or be deceptive). This position is patently impossible, biblically-speaking. (It also rages against simple common sense.) --- >but I don't think evolution is incompatible with Christianity. Its not per se. Microevolution of smol organisms (ant-sized or smol'r -- but especially the microbes) is directly-observable under controlled conditions. And that fact isn't at odds with any biblical precepts, either. But so-called neo-Darwinian "Macroevolution" isn't in fact real at all. God directly-created all advanced life species. He is also the sole, one-and-only Originator of all life forms (and indeed the entirety of the universe) [3]. >tl;dr True, but neither is it necessary.

>>42702 Another point towards neo-lamarckianism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hologenome_theory_of_evolution

>>42706 Intredasting. While I'm not convinced, I'm also aware of so-called microchimerism, so I don't consider the idea so far-fetched as to be out of the realm of possibility. As to the basic idea of host/parasite symbiosis, that's well-proven. My favorite example to share with laymen out in the field are trees -- especially the really big ones: they are a vast collection of biomes & sub-biomes within their innate structures (often comprised of hundreds and thousands of different [and differing] species). They are practically an """economy""" of bio-riches "changing hands" moment-to-moment within/upon them! :^)

>>39414 Done.

>>39397 ok text is now a bigga

>>39429 Done.

>>42709 Done.

>>42667 >>42670 Simply put, we need to popularize local SLMs/LLMs. Too many people see AI as either a god, or a demon if you're a leftoid artist. This is no doubt the result of ((((marketing)))), but it's also just unfamiliarity with the technology and the power of the Turing Test. Personally, I see online AIs as a wise professor. He is very knowledgeable, but he is not my friend, nor is he infallible. And I don't use ChatGPT for anything other than image generation.

>>42673 >Personally, I see online AIs as a wise professor. He is very knowledgeable, but he is not my friend, nor is he infallible. That's a pretty good way of putting things, Anon.

>>42673 Wrangling with various AIs, I look at 'em more like fully automated space luxury autism :)

>>42683 ChatGPT is an HR employee that's really good at art Grok is autistic Claude is a neurotic mental patient Copilot is Microsoft Tech Support saar DeepSeek is the pic of chad Xi Jinping Gemini is a retarded DEI employee (glue pizza is part of they's culture, you bigotcel!!!)

>>42683 >>42684 Lel'd. :DD