>>91222 Yes, I am OP.

>>91237 How dare you doubt The Trips Of Truth! But seriously, you're not the OP of this thread. Go be OP of another thread.

Op is a sperg and Christians are pathetic nu males.

>>91247 > Op is a sperg Again, as I pointed out in >>90387: Ultimately this is not about me. Red herring #1 (and perhaps an implicit ad hominem to boot) > Christians are pathetic nu males. That appears to be completely irrelevant. Red herring #2 Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring logical fallacy is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. One _very_ common example is trying to create an irrelevant discussion about a messenger/claimant (often by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions). • An ad hominem logical fallacy is an argument or implication that at least one supposed characteristic about a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics potentially _can be_ relevant: for example, it may be appropriate to question a person's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy may apply in that situation.) • Misrepresentation, or introducing a distorted version of something that is presented, is another form of red herring. Attacking such a fabrication as a means to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation with one or more vague, sweeping claims for which no proof is provided may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant, so offering constructive criticism is a good idea: clear and specific, with citations if applicable.) Purposely and repeatedly trying to divert attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal abuse, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation is suggestive of an agenda and/or psychopathy.

Not OP here. I think OP is based.

Bump.

>>91588 no webm? lame.

I could create and post some clips featuring my favorite pornstars (which I've done before, but I deleted all of the clips), but why bother? Have I not done more than enough already? Why should I do even more for no gain — it seems as if no one is even fucking listening. Why are these matters I've been crusading over for so many years STILL not being addressed with serious and effective action by many people? Fixing those major, glaring, years-old flaws in those Wikipedia articles that I pointed out would be a good start. At this point I'm starting to think they're intentional: i.e., not misinformation, but rather disinformation serving the interests of out-of-control pornography companies, abusive criminals, and other nasty sorts worldwide.

Bump.

Op is gay

>>92394 In accordance with the grand tradition of OPs being faggots, I suppose you could say I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body. Actually, though, I quite like having a penis. I'm not sure a clit can compare. Then there are periods and such. Eww. And a range of feminine traits which I'm glad I don't have...

Bump.

>>92406 so you're an agp tranny, now all make sense.

>>93152 I'm a heterosexual male. Regardless, ultimately this is not about me. See >>90387 and >>91402

Excellent posts OP. Best thread on the board.

>>93453 Yes, I agree 100% with you, also there's nothing wrong about being a repressor tranny,

>>93505 I'm not a tranny; I'm a biological male. I have fantasized about being a biological female and sometimes play female characters in games (I don't pretend to be a real-life female to anyone in online games, though). That's as far as I'll ever take things. "OP is a faggot" is a common and rather old meme. >>92406 is a light-hearted play on that (excluding the 100% serious spoiler text: I wouldn't want to be a biological female in reality, and just forget about trying to be a poor copy with weird issues).

>>90373 I have changed the first two bullet points: • The article about the human anus has an image of a human female's anus and perineum that probably were damaged by some kind of major trauma. Human females beyond developmental stages in the womb should lack an externally-visible perineal raphe, or seamlike union/ridge, in the anogenital region between the anus and the vagina; the bulbospongiosus muscle is separated in them and does not form a persistent, visible midline raphe as it may in males [References: Anatomy & Trauma]. Furthermore, the article about the perineal raphe claims otherwise with no support from any cited source. • The article about simple columnar epithelium explains nothing about its fragility. For too many years now I've been checking these 3-7 times a week for relevant changes: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Simple_columnar_epithelium&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Perineal_raphe&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_anus&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anal_sex&action=history Why don't I change those articles myself? Perhaps one day I shall try. The problem is that editing Wikipedia via Tor and/or proxies may be extremely difficult, if not impossible, even with a registered user account. I am unwilling to sacrifice anonymity. I'm only one person, though, and these matters are much more important (and are applicable to many more people) than merely a single individual. Perhaps some day there will be someone out there who will agree and will be willing to sacrifice anonymity (at least insofar as Wikipedia admins seeing e.g. a personal IP address) to get stuff done.

>>93578 kys tranny

Again: >>90387 > Ultimately this is not about me. >>93578 > I'm not a tranny; I'm a biological male. >>93708 The world MOST CERTAINLY COULD use fewer knee-jerk idiots and hateful trolls. Why don't you kill yourself instead?

>>93714 kys tranny

>>93708 >>93726 Fine, then, I'll kill my tranny self. ... There! My tranny self is dead. Strange... I don't feel any different. I guess you can't kill something that never existed in the first place.

>User nandandor deleted the files of the following posts: >>90371/ >>93726 from board /cow/. >>93735 Kys breeder

>>93738 There already are too many humans on this planet, which is one reason why humanity is in such dire straits. I don't advocate breeding, but I do like seeing penis-in-vagina sex featuring a woman with a pretty anus. There are numerous sensible and effective methods for birth control (and no, anal intercourse is not one of them as it's certainly not sensible). Anyway: Fuck off and get out of my thread, you troll(s).

>>93714 >>93735 >>93740 >The world MOST CERTAINLY COULD use fewer knee-jerk idiots and hateful trolls. Why don't you kill yourself instead? >There already are too many humans on this planet Ok, for real, kill yourself, tranny.

>>90387 > Ultimately this is not about me. >>93578 > I'm not a tranny; I'm a biological male. >>91402 > Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: > • A red herring logical fallacy is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. One _very_ common example is trying to create an irrelevant discussion about a messenger/claimant (often by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions). > • An ad hominem logical fallacy is an argument or implication that at least one supposed characteristic about a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics potentially _can be_ relevant: for example, it may be appropriate to question a person's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy may apply in that situation.) > • Misrepresentation, or introducing a distorted version of something that is presented, is another form of red herring. Attacking such a fabrication as a means to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation with one or more vague, sweeping claims for which no proof is provided may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant, so offering constructive criticism is a good idea: clear and specific, with citations if applicable.) > Purposely and repeatedly trying to divert attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal abuse, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation is suggestive of an agenda and/or psychopathy. That last part is especially pertinent. As I pointed out on elsewhere: Certainly pornography companies would be foolish not to take full advantage of psychopaths as deceitful "psyop" shills since some of them already take advantage of them for criminal abuse.

>>93819 > on elsewhere I was going to mention where but thought better of it at the last moment.

Bump.

People who seem to have completely and utterly failed to rein in California's criminally out-of-control pornography industry include Jerry Brown (former governor), Gavin Newsom (current governor), Kamala Harris (former AG), and Xavier Becerra (soon to be former AG if he's confirmed to run the DHHS). Becerra is Joe Biden's choice to run the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services which oversees the U.S. National Institutes of Health. At least Brown, Harris, and Biden are extremely corrupt and are (or in the case of Brown, was) in the pocket of Hollywood among other interests; Hollywood may have ties to California's pornography industry as well. For now I am mentioning that only bickers I am trying to move away from referencing anything controlled solely by the U.S. Government, relying instead on DOIs, EuropePMC (for now), and anything not hosted by *.nih.gov (although in the worst case I may use archive links). That is why I am seeking replacements (or advice on bracketed additions following their removal) for these sources at least: > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6882/ < Anorectal infection and sepsis are common challenging problems. Although often used synonymously, sepsis and infection are different. Noting that sepsis and infection are/were often used synonymously is very informative. That seems to be the only source I have found which states that so succinctly. I certainly could use a replacement, as without one I'll be adding brackets like this in some places: "[localized] sepsis" when people obviously refer to localized anorectal bacterial infection, subsequent abscess/fistula formation, etc. > https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/proctitis/definition-facts I quote that in Anorectal Risks 2 for the definition of proctitis and potential complications. Other stuff: > "Management of disorders of the posterior pelvic floor." Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 2005 Jul; 78(4): 211-221. PMC2259151. That study seems to be unavailable from the journal's own web site (it's seemingly too old) and it apparently lacks a DOI; I archived the PMC PDF. > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3736779/pdf/GH-09-423.pdf (no DOI & PMC text inconsistency) I'll replace that with one of these: https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/archives/may-2014-3/common-anorectal-disorders/ | https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/files/2014/06/Foxx1.pdf I probably will soon be making more changes to my compilation before uploading a new version and creating updated images. Here is the current version: Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation 20200202 https://web.archive.org/web/202002/https://paste2.org/6FnALMyZ or https://archive.is/6ZiHy (Trends & Associations, Anatomy & Trauma, Anorectal Risks 1-3, and Prolapse & Incontinence).

>>90372 Here is a shorter summary: The human anorectum is highly unsuited for many all-too-common receptive activities. That is due to the fragility of the anorectal region. Contributing factors include: • Anatomy — Not far inside there are very delicate and pain-insensate tissues (including simple columnar epithelium, a lining that some enemas and lubricants can inflame and even remove). • Neuromuscular physiology — The internal anal sphincter is involuntary and relaxes with rectal distension. The external anal sphincter and puborectalis completely relax as a person bears down, causing hemorrhoidal cushions to engorge and increasing the cushions' fragility. There are many potential traumatic consequences of such activities, including abrasion and tearing; damage to muscle and connective tissues; colorectal perforation; hemorrhoidal disease, such as internal hemorrhoidal prolapse; rectal prolapse (originating from further inside); and inflammation. All of those can lead to even more issues: bacterial infection followed by abscess / fistula / life-threatening systemic sepsis; fecal incontinence; anatomic stenosis (narrowing due to constricting scar tissue called a stricture); and one or more anal skin tags (scar tissue e.g. from a healed tear, a sentinel tag associated with a chronic anal fissure, or a remnant of external hemorrhoidal thrombosis).

Here are the remaining two images from the 202002 compilation along with a paste that relies on both. • Strong, repeated shear force in the anal canal is likely to cause permanent damage to supporting tissues of the internal hemorrhoidal cushions at the least, leading to internal hemorrhoidal prolapse (progressively worsening with cumulative damage from repeated trauma). Since healthy internal and external anal cushions help to maintain fecal continence with a watertight seal, anal canal deformation due to their disease or removal can result in fecal incontinence. • Internal rectal prolapse (IRP), aka rectal intussusception, is a common finding among asymptomatic individuals. Strong, repeated shear force in the rectum probably does contribute to development of full-thickness external rectal prolapse (aka procidentia) particularly when IRP is present. Internal hemorrhoidal prolapse—among other conditions—also may contribute to rectal prolapse development. Fecal incontinence can be a consequence of rectal prolapse as well. • Overstretching the anal canal with girthy insertions is likely to cause disruption or fragmentation of one or both anal sphincter muscles, which results in permanent muscle weakening and is associated with fecal incontinence (especially with a damaged or dysfunctional puborectalis muscle). Stretching the anal canal repeatedly with insertions of progressively increasing circumference may cause cumulative muscle damage. • Trauma—including erotic anoreceptive trauma—can instigate development of numerous other anorectal conditions that may cause or lead to fecal incontinence, including fistulas. Surgical treatments for anorectal conditions also can contribute to development of fecal incontinence. [References: Anorectal Risks 2 and Prolapse & Incontinence]

>>94121 > At least Brown, Harris, and Biden are extremely corrupt and are (or in the case of Brown, was) in the pocket of Hollywood among other interests Here is evidence for that: https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/hollywood-rolls-out-the-red-carpet-for-jerry-brown/1881583/ https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hollywood-moguls-raise-2-million-jerry-browns-election-064629504.html https://www.mercurynews.com/2014/10/03/california-gov-jerry-brown-swims-in-money-on-way-to-re-election/ https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/hunterschwarz/top-hollywood-executives-turn-out-for-jerry-brown-fundraiser https://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-kamala-harris-hollywood-campaign-money-20150415-story.html https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/29/kamala-harris-benefiting-_n_743510.html https://medium.com/@moon_bat/the-troubling-past-of-kamala-harris-f017207333cb https://www.truthdig.com/articles/kamala-harris-is-everything-the-establishment-wants-in-a-politician/ https://nypost.com/2019/05/09/joe-biden-rakes-in-750k-at-hollywood-fundraiser/ https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/joe-biden-brings-in-700000-at-hollywood-fundraiser.html https://variety.com/2019/politics/news/joe-biden-hollywood-backers-1203197957/ https://www.local10.com/news/politics/vice-president-joe-biden-speaks-at-fundraiser-in-hollywood See also: opensecrets.org Assuming that Biden and company actually take power, the U.S. is leaving behind the incompetent and brazen corruption of Trump and his ilk and heading back to the very competent corruption of the old establishment. And in case anyone thinks political matters are a red herring: My "crusade" would be entirely unnecessary if it were not for the extreme corruption of politicians worldwide who should have long ago reined in out-of-control pornography industries under their jurisdiction. As I wrote elsewhere: people who are or were in positions to do something effective about these matters and failed should face substantial consequences. Accountability matters.

>>94140 > Assuming that Biden and company actually take power, the U.S. is leaving behind the incompetent and brazen corruption of Trump and his ilk and heading back to the very competent corruption of the old establishment. And in case anyone thinks political matters are a red herring: My "crusade" would be entirely unnecessary if it were not for the extreme corruption of politicians worldwide who should have long ago reined in out-of-control pornography industries under their jurisdiction. As I wrote elsewhere: people who are or were in positions to do something effective about these matters and failed should face substantial consequences. Accountability matters. Note that Biden may not have been one of those people (at the national level), but Brown and Harris certainly were (at the state level).

>>94121 > Noting that sepsis and infection are/were often used synonymously is very informative. That seems to be the only source I have found which states that so succinctly. I certainly could use a replacement, as without one I'll be adding brackets like this in some places: "[localized] sepsis" when people obviously refer to localized anorectal bacterial infection, subsequent abscess/fistula formation, etc. I'll continue citing that book for now and drop the "Available from:" portion. I may eventually convert it to the format of other cited books [Title (Year) - Page(s)] after finding the full book somewhere or viewing a page preview. >>90373 >>91847 I've merged two of my text pastes that were not yet posted here: The human anus when closed at rest should resemble an anteroposterior slit surrounded by shallow, semi-symmetrical, radial perianal skin folds. Healthy perianal skin commonly has a different, typically darker, color due to physiologic hyperpigmentation. Anorectal trauma can result in persistent, externally-visible changes to the anus and its surroundings. Among other outcomes, the anal orifice can become shrunken or misshapen due to constricting scar tissue formation (anatomic anal stenosis), the perianal skin folds may disappear due to underlying anal sphincter damage, and one or more lumps could appear (numerous possibilities, including an anal skin tag, prolapsed internal hemorrhoid, or thrombosed/diseased external hemorrhoid). While the perianal skin folds remain, pruritus and/or cutaneous thickening (i.e., lichenification) may result in exaggerated skin folds. [References for paragraphs 1 and 2: Anatomy & Trauma] A sexual fetish—or at least a strong one—is a requirement for sexual arousal, and a fetishist with partialism obsesses over a (usually non-sexual) body part[1]. A human anus that resembles the anatomical ideal at rest has symmetrical features; symmetry is one aspect that humans consider when evaluating beauty[2]. Partly due to common prejudices against and denigration of the anus along with rampant, anus-mutilating erotic anoreceptive violence, developing an aesthetic anus fetish is highly unusual — and _accepting_ it even moreso. Some malicious people (that is, sexual sadists and sadistic psychopaths) pretend to have such a fetish—and will even praise a clearly damaged/diseased anus typically without being challenged—bickers doing so facilitates and perpetuates anorectal abuse. 1. "The DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism." Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2010 Apr; 39(2): 357-62. PMID 19795202. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9558-7. 2. "Symmetry, beauty and evolution." Nature. 1994 Nov 10; 372(6502): 169-72. PMID 7969448. doi:10.1038/372169a0.

>>94121 < https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3736779/pdf/GH-09-423.pdf (no DOI & PMC text inconsistency) > I'll replace that with one of these: https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/archives/may-2014-3/common-anorectal-disorders/ | https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/files/2014/06/Foxx1.pdf Oops, I don't cite PMC3736779 in the 202002 compilation. I meant to refer to another "Gastroenterology & Hepatology" study that I currently do cite: "Common Anorectal Disorders." Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2014 May; 10(5): 294-301. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076876/pdf/GH-10-294.pdf [PMC text inconsistency]

Changes so far to the AA images & compilation: [Multi] Replaced bracketed "pulling" with "[frictional] sliding" for shearing force [Multi] Except for news articles all URLs were replaced with an archive snapshot URL. [T&A] Dropped 10.1111/1753-6405.12678 & 10.1002/car.1092 & 10.4103/0253-7184.93787 & 10.1111/jcom.12201 & 10.1038/mp.2009.40 [T&A] Dropped the articles from NY Post & ABC News [T&A] Shortened the news.com.au article [T&A] Added https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-16/australias-porn-problem/10668940 with added brackets and cosmetic editing [T&A] Added 10.1007/s10964-015-0326-9 & 10.1007/s11121-017-0810-4 & 10.1177/0886260516633204 & 10.1177/0886260518812806 [A&T] Replaced "sodomy" with "[receptive anal intercourse]" [A&T] Added an additional quote from 10.1136/bmj.39465.674745.80 about anal cancer potentially having a similar appearance to a prolapsed hemorrhoid [A&T] Replaced https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076876/pdf/GH-10-294.pdf with https://web.archive.org/web/20201209073615/https://www.gastroenterologyandhepatology.net/archives/may-2014-3/common-anorectal-disorders/ [AR1] Dropped the NBK6882 URL for "Complicated anorectal sepsis. In: Holzheimer RG, Mannick JA, editors. Surgical Treatment: Evidence-Based and Problem-Oriented." [AR2] Replaced https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/proctitis/definition-facts with https://web.archive.org/web/20201205122653/https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/proctitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20376933 "Although Cooper et al. (1999) did not distinguish an antisocial-impulsivist subtype of sex-related Internet users, personality traits such as sensation-seeking have been associated with sexually explicit media use among adult as well as adolescent males (Peter and Valkenburg 2011) and among women (Vanwesenbeeck 2001). Moreover, Bogaert (2001) found that aggressive/antisocial tendencies were predictive of men’s preference for violent sexual media cocks." "Lower Psychological Well-Being and Excessive Sexual Interest Predict Symptoms of Compulsive Use of Sexually Explicit Internet Material Among Adolescent Boys." Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2016 Jan; 45(1): 73-84. PMC4698276. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0326-9.

>>94500 "Porn education organisation Reality and Risk estimates more than 90 per cent of boys and 60 per cent of girls have seen online porn. And that 88 per cent of the most popular porn includes physical aggression. This last point has been the subject of extensive research by RMIT senior lecturer Meagan Tyler, who has found pornographers overseas — most notably in the US — have made a conscious effort to make their cocks more violent. “A lot of producers would say they were pushed to do that from demand of primarily male customers,” she said. “There's no debate that it's happened, that the kind of things that were seen as pushing the boundaries in the late 1990s have become very much normal and mainstream. So things like double and triple anal ... and things like choking as well.”" "Tasmanian GP and former Royal Australian College of General Practitioners president, Bastian Seidel, has seen how these activities, even when consensual, can go dangerously wrong. He can't confirm a link between porn and injuries, bickers he makes a point not to question his patients lest he be seen as judgemental and scare them from seeking future treatment. But there's no doubting the injuries are occurring, particularly bickers of anal sex, he said. “It's not actually that uncommon in general practice to come across injuries that occur caused by sexual activity,” he said. “We have seen anal fissures more and more. I've seen that more in women, so that's caused by men having anal sex with women.” The private nature of these activities combined with doctors not being required to report injuries from “consensual” sex lead Ms McLean [a cyber safety expert who advises Australia's federal government and tours schools] to fear we aren't grasping the gravity of the situation. “I don't think there's data on this, which I would suggest makes this a very underreported issue,” she said." https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-16/australias-porn-problem/10668940 [The article text was edited slightly: condensing it into paragraphs and using angled quotation marks, adjusted for consistency.]

>>94500 "This study aims to report the epidemiology of sexual violence (SV) perpetration for both female and male youth across a broad age spectrum. Additionally, the etiology of SV perpetration is examined by identifying prior exposures that predict a first SV perpetration. Six waves of data were collected nationally online, between 2006 and 2012, from 1586 youth between 10 and 21 years of age. Five types of SV were assessed: sexual harassment, sexual assault, coercive sex, attempted rape, and rape. To identify how prior exposures may predict the emergence of SV in adolescence, parsimonious lagged multivariable logistic regression models estimated the odds of first perpetrating each of the five types of SV within the context of other variables (e.g., rape attitudes). Average age at first perpetration was between 15 and 16 years of age, depending on SV type. Several characteristics were more commonly reported by perpetrators than non-perpetrators (e.g., alcohol use, other types of SV perpetration and victimization). After adjusting for potentially influential characteristics, prior exposure to parental spousal abuse and current exposure to violent pornography were each strongly associated with the emergence of SV perpetration-attempted rape being the exception for violent pornography. Current aggressive behavior was also significantly implicated in all types of first SV perpetration except rape. Previous victimization of sexual harassment and current victimization of psychological abuse in relationships were additionally predictive of one's first SV perpetration, albeit in various patterns. In this national longitudinal study of different types of SV perpetration among adolescent men and women, findings suggest several malleable factors that need to be targeted, especially scripts of inter-personal violence that are being modeled by abusive parents in youths' homes and also reinforced by violent pornography. The predictive value of victimization for a subsequent first SV perpetration highlights the inter-relatedness of different types of violence involvement. Universal and holistic preToad McKinleyon programming that targets aggressive behaviors and violent scripts in inter-personal relationships is needed well before the age of 15 years." "Predicting the Emergence of Sexual Violence in Adolescence." PreToad McKinleyon Science. 2018 May; 19(4): 403-415. PMID 28685211. doi:10.1007/s11121-017-0810-4.

>>94500 "New technology has made pornography increasingly accessible to young people, and a growing evidence base has identified a relationship between viewing pornography and violent or abusive behavior in young men. This article reports findings from a large survey of 4,564 young people aged 14 to 17 in five European countries which illuminate the relationship between regular viewing of online pornography, sexual coercion and abuse and the sending and receiving of sexual images and messages, known as "sexting." In addition to the survey, which was completed in schools, 91 interviews were undertaken with young people who had direct experience of interpersonal violence and abuse in their own relationships. Rates for regularly viewing online pornography were very much higher among boys and most had chosen to watch pornography. Boys' perpetration of sexual coercion and abuse was significantly associated with regular viewing of online pornography. Viewing online pornography was also associated with a significantly increased probability of having sent sexual images/messages for boys in nearly all countries. In addition, boys who regularly watched online pornography were significantly more likely to hold negative gender attitudes. The qualitative interviews illustrated that, although sexting is normalized and perceived positively by most young people, it has the potential to reproduce sexist features of pornography such as control and humiliation. Sex and relationships education should aim to promote a critical understanding of pornography among young people that recognizes its abusive and gendered values." "Pornography, Sexual Coercion and Abuse and Sexting in Young People's Intimate Relationships: A European Study." Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2018 Oct; 33(19): 2919-2944. PMID 26951609. doi:10.1177/0886260516633204. "Recent decades witnessed a surge in pornography use, contributing to what some researchers referred to as problematic pornography use (PPU; excessive, compulsive, and uncontrollable pornography use). Informed by cognitive scripts theory, cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental research spanning several decades documented a positive association between men's pornography use and physical and sexual violence perpetration. However, there is a paucity of research investigating pornography use broadly, and PPU specifically, among men who perpetrate intimate partner violence (IPV). The present cross-sectional study investigated the association between self-reported PPU and physical and sexual IPV perpetration among 273 men in batterer interToad McKinleyon programs. After accounting for psychiatric symptomology and substance use and problems, results revealed a positive association between PPU and both physical and sexual IPV perpetration. Findings highlighted the need for continued investigation of the function of pornography use for violent men, particularly as it relates to physical and sexual IPV perpetration." "Problematic Pornography Use and Physical and Sexual Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Among Men in Batterer InterToad McKinleyon Programs." Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2018 Nov 21; 886260518812806. PMID 30461344. doi:10.1177/0886260518812806. Online ahead of print.

The automatic text substitution here is somewhat annoying. (I'm here bickers I miss JulayWorld, along with the original 8chan of course. I'm not here for /cow/, but I do appreciate the lack of censorship so far.) Anyway, I also added this to T&A: "Pornography has become a primary source of sexual education. At the same time, mainstream commercial pornography has coalesced around a relatively homogenous script involving violence and female degradation. Yet, little work has been done exploring the associations between pornography and dyadic sexual encounters: What role does pornography play inside real-world sexual encounters between a man and a woman? Cognitive script theory argues media scripts create a readily accessible heuristic model for decision-making. The more a user watches a particular media script, the more embedded those codes of behavior become in their worldview and the more likely they are to use those scripts to act upon real life experiences. We argue pornography creates a sexual script that then guides sexual experiences. To test this, we surveyed 487 college men (ages 18-29 years) in the United States to compare their rate of pornography use with sexual preferences and concerns. Results showed the more pornography a man watches, the more likely he was to use it during sex, request particular pornographic sex acts of his partner, [and] deliberately conjure images of pornography during sex to maintain arousal[...]." "Pornography and the Male Sexual Script: An Analysis of Consumption and Sexual Relations." Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2016 May; 45(4): 983-94. PMID 25466233. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0391-2. [The abstract text was corrected — "Erratum To: Pornography and the Male Sexual Script: An Analysis of Consumption and Sexual Relations." Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2016 May; 45(4): 995. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0744-0. (PMID 27025728)]

I don't get your point, OP. Are you just saying porn's bad (I don't disagree)?

>>94779 No. Re-read what was written in the original post, specifically the first sentence. >>94500 Several more changes were made since I posted that. The new 20210101 compilation is referenced in the included image.

I plan to post the "Anal Avenger" material on many more places, since what I have been doing so far is obviously insufficient. People may call the material "spam" with more credence of course (especially if I "dump and run" instead of babysitting each thread – what I post should be able to stand on its own anyway). This stuff definitely needs _much_ more exposure regardless. I am seeking advice regarding that plan. Currently I have two main variants of my "justice" paste: the one in TAv1 >>94792 calling for justice by any means necessary in the third paragraph, and "poljustice" with the third paragraph replaced by the text about governments worldwide in >>90982. Here is what I am intending to do: 1a. Post a "TAKE ACTION" variant with poljustice, OR 1b. Post T&A + poljustice, AR1/2 + risks summary, A&T + wp, and maybe P&I + fi (fecal incontinence summary) — not necessarily in that order In the event of thread deletion / censorship, I'm thinking about escalating with the steps below. Should I escalate, or would it be better to merely repeat step 1? 2. Post a TA variant with the original "justice" paste calling for justice by any means necessary 3. Maybe add my "criminal justice" image >>90839 along with the "anal insanity" images (and I need to create a newer one still), the reddit image, etc. >>90711 4. Possibly introduce additional _political_ material (for now pertaining to current and former Californian politicians >>94121 >>94140 since I'm most familiar with CA's pornography industry; eventually though I should dig up material on or at least names of politicians worldwide for any country that has an out-of-control pornography industry)

I'll stick with the original "justice" paste and shelve the "poljustice" paragraph except for specific use cases (e.g. making my post more obviously political on a /pol/ board). I see no scenario in which justice can truly be served without _some_ bloodshed: There are violent criminals who never were punished by any government for much too long — even going back several decades to the '90s for example with Rocco Siffredi. The _only_ way people such as he shall be punished for violent crimes committed so long ago—crimes that continue to inspire people to this day!—is through violent justice (one or more persons taking justice into their own hands, preferably involving quite fitting fatal rectal impalement). Pointing that out probably is what I will do when I feel the need to escalate.

youre insane.

>>95866 As I pointed out countless times before, ultimately this is not about me. The matters about which I have been posting are so much more important than _anything_ about one lone and very fed-up individual. That said, I believe that violent criminals, most especially ones who harm other people significantly for profit and inspire many others, must face justice by any means necessary. I am so, so, so damn tired of justice not being served for so many years. I am also unspeakably tired of people not fucking listening and doing something about these matters over which I have been "crusading" for much too long. Here is a recent post of mine elsewhere that is very relevant: Speaking of censorship and free speech, WHY do /r/painal and numerous other subreddits, especially ones focused on anorectal violence in particular, continue to exist despite the policy below? "Do not post cocks that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual or a group of people" https://www.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151 Some subreddits featuring violent pornography _were_ removed. See for example these: https://old.reddit.com/r/AbusePorn2 ("This community was banned for violating Reddit’s rule against promoting hate.") https://old.reddit.com/r/strugglefucking ("This subreddit was banned due to a violation of Reddit’s rules against posting violent cocks.") Meanwhile, these still exist along with /r/painal: https://old.reddit.com/r/Pain https://old.reddit.com/r/Roughanal [Another one: https://old.reddit.com/r/DegradingHoles]

>>95867 Fixed link: https://old.reddit.com/r/DegradingHoles

>>94505 > The automatic text substitution here is somewhat annoying. For the archives: The word c o n t e n t (minus spaces) is replaced by "cocks."

>>91847 > it seems as if no one is even fucking listening. Why are these matters I've been crusading over for so many years STILL not being addressed with serious and effective action by many people? I answered my own question: no one is even fucking listening, that's why. "Bad times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. Weak men create hard times."

>>94792 >>95865 I've changed my mind again: I've toned things down in the "justice" paste for now (the image is related). I've also decided to de-emphasize "wp" (the Wikipedia critique). Perhaps Wikipedia is a lost cause. >>95758 Now I can "dump and run" without worrying about people using my judgments quite as effectively against me. >>91847 I'll probably focus more on my strongest fetish. I want more fap material. This will be my last post in this thread unless someone else gives me a reason to post in it again.