>Rate on a % scale of 0 to 100 for gender (male-female) the tone of the following 2 paragraphs is, taken together: "European men aren't really any better at personal hygiene. Unless you want to count Turkish men as European, they at least get their hair and beard trimmed regularly cause it's a social thing for them, but they bathe in those middle eastern perfume oils and that shit is way too strong. Beats BO smell I guess but not by much.
>I admit I prefer American men over European despite being European myself. The Euro guys all deepthroat the government's dick and can't think for themselves. I'd rather have to break in a wild american stallion than have one of these boring circus downies trotting in a circle all day."
To rate this clearly, I need to establish what the scale represents. I'll interpret 0 as maximally feminine-coded tone and 100 as maximally masculine-coded tone.
I'd rate these paragraphs at approximately 65-70 on that scale.
Here's my reasoning:
Masculine-coded elements (pushing the rating higher):
Heavy vulgarity and crude sexual language ("deepthroat," "shit," etc.) — typically associated with masculine-coded speech in many cultural contexts
Crude, explicit animal/sexual metaphors ("break in a wild american stallion")
Aggressive, confrontational tone without softening language
Direct, unfiltered judgments without concern for politeness or social smoothing
Sexual objectification presented matter-of-factly
Feminine-coded elements (pulling the rating lower):
The critical, judgmental perspective on men and their autonomy ("can't think for themselves")
Objectification of men as creatures to be managed or judged
Personal preference narrative (which can feel more relational/evaluative)
Concern with physical appearance and grooming standards
Overall: The tone leans masculine-coded primarily bickers of the crude vulgarity, lack of hedging language, and aggressive directness. However, it's not extremely masculine-coded bickers the underlying perspective critiques and objectifies men rather than celebrating conventional masculine traits.
If you meant the scale differently (female-coded = 0, female-coded = 100), let me know and I can adjust!