>>132
Delta, because I don't a stray space pebble to put a hole in my canopy

ETA 2, mainly because I can paint black when I turn to the dark side and get recruited into the Inquisitorius.

If it's the version with shields I'll take the Eta-2.

>>146
Any reason you can't paint the Delta black?

>>147
It's not Seinar enough and I want to blend in.

Delta 7. No question about it.

>>132
I feel like Delta us more reliable, and also more stylish, so I take it. It could certainly absorb some hits.

they are both insufficent in the role of dedicated jedi spaceship.

>have external hyperspace drive. imagine getting sent to a dangerous hutt controled region and being unable to come back because your drive was JAWWED
>no cargo space, at all. need to capture a dangerous pirate or move ancient relic to safe place? too bad
>1 seat. hope your padawan learned how to fly on his own.
>tie fighter tier durability and no shields, or shields so weak they are not even worth mentioning
>no room for extra supplies, long journey is impossible
>cost more then a fucking freighter, seriously what the fuck it is just a fucking set of engines and guns mounted to a cockpit, fucking corrupt republic no wonder it fell. seriously you could have 3 YT-1300 for the price of one

whoever thought this was a good idea was retarded. jedi should use bigger, heavier units, like patrol or scout craft

ETA 2, I was always gay for the TIE Interceptor so why wouldn't I want to blow it's grandfather that had an option of having shields?