>>30969
Heh, they are going to run into the whole power/mass ratio issue now, same as all the
other humanoid robotics companies. Burning hydrocarbons is a very energy-dense way to motivate cars (or robots). Now they are taking the 'EV' pill, they will be on level ground with say,
Optimus.
>tl;dr
BD has a long row to hoe now. But of course the perceived """superiority""" of their competition will probably light a bigger fire under the other vendors. This, ofc, should accelerate the eventual introduction of home-based service robots -> companion robots.
All of them GH Surveillance-State Specials, sadly.
>>30970
Great insight, Anon. I've been trying to think several design approaches for a while that take advantage of this very concept.
Volume is certainly one of the several severe constraints we're all up against here.