>>28866
>>28867
>>28873
Good find! Adjusting power to actuators based on what is actually needed is essential for waifu efficiency!
>>28910
Excellent out of the box thinking! Could be helpful for budget systems that need sudden bursts of power. Though, a proper coupling system to deliver power when needed, without imposing significant friction.
>>28911
Explain how a magnet on a balloon could affect the actuation of a waifu. If you fail to do so, your post will be deleted.
>>28921
>Power Randoseru
Just like in Prima Doll! Though, routing kinetic energy from turbines into your waifu to animate her, is beyond my imagination at this point.
>>28943
See
>>29007
and
>>29020
For the objectively correct answer on how to actuate the telescoping arm.
>>28976
>Pulley maintaining static position sans power
Are you referencing differential pulley systems (also known as differential/Chinese windlass)?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_pulley
https://makezine.com/projects/the-chinese-windlass//
Otherwise, there is too much friction in your pulley system. Without input power, the system should allow for the load to fall until it is stopped.
>>29014
>>29030
>>29032
>>29034
I understand you are learning and likely have familiarity with pulleys. This being said, every method of reduction and translation of energy has its place and use. Pulleys are not universally superior in all applications. For a linear actuator based telescoping robotic arm, the precision/load capacity/simplicity of implementation of a stepper driven lead screw relative to its cost is essentially unbeatable. A pulley system can be used to achieve the same results, it will be more expensive, more complex, and require the same volume per work area. If you wish to argue your point, do so with engineering. Prove me wrong by designing and implementing a pulley based robot arm.
Furthermore, try to think and breathe while your post. You are speaking with others who going through similar challenges and want to see you succeed. Be kind, always.