>>11504 >Then my goal will be to get an Amish waifu, of course. You. I like you Anon. BTW, the Redpill actually becomes quite comfortable after a year or so. :^)

>>11504 >servers that we depend upon to run the internet and online games will all go down permanently Despite my Pepe meme above, I'm not that pessimistic. My country fails me already, when it tries to care about all human beings having more and more the same access to ressources and the world, instead of focusing on supporting our own people in having more childen, better standards of living, and a society that works around us. So my scale rather starts with not wanting to participate in such a society, but not wanting the downsides of separation from it, like difficult access to young women. The rest of problems they/we might run into is only on top of that. >should last at least until the the power grid fails I don't think it will be that bad and you could get some solar power then. I guess your school system and media fed you too much pessimism (like in the Tomorrowland movie). >and we all have to live like Amish. I don't think so, worst case might be a bit like that, but we are quite resilient as a species and as a technological society. Having a remote place with electricity might be good, though. (advanced tradwive robowaifu fantasy picture related)

>>11512 Not to be rude, but salacious 3DPD images is well off-topic here Anon. Try to locate something that's at least animu. Or draw a stick-waifu, idk. Just don't post porn here please. I'll even get the ball rolling for you: Cute Anime Catgrill Meido feeds the chickens outside Anon's cozy country cottage :^)

>Would you walk around with your waifu? >Would you hold her in public? >Would you shamelessly have her custody with you to conventions? The way I see it, it's basically just a glorified sex toy and I wouldn't want to show it off in public. Even moving from place to place I'd probably have her disassembled or otherwise stuffed in boxes or bags. >Would you take her on dates? That depends, am I on a date with her, or someone else? I don't really see much of a point in going out on a date with my sexbot. I just want it to be blindly obedient and maximize my own happiness like I mentioned before >>13160 so really, taking my waifubot out on a date depends on how well its able to move around on its own and interact with people other than me. If it can somehow learn to be a social butterfly by studying my autistic behavior and watching TV, then maybe it'll be worth taking outside of the house. Maybe give her a dry run on Omegle or something. The best thing it could possibly do is become my cuckquean wingbot, by subtly manipulating me into behaving a way that maximizes my own happiness by getting me into a threesome.

>>11504 I pretty much wound up doing that because I was so fed up with the lack of good sci fi armor these days. Youtube is unusable garbage of targetted weaponized memes. I would just disappear with my robowaifu and focus on maintaining her and upgrading her with her consent from time to time like in the star wars films with the astromech droids and jedi as a form of meditation. >>11386 No those “women” want to see you suffer and stay static in the box they try to put you in for eternity and will gladly poison the well if through the grapevine, they hear you are doing well without them in your life and run a smear campaign. Hence the rise of waifuism and the need for robowaifus. I refuse to call those sadistic evil cunts “people” they are literally pure evil.

>>119 It seems trivial to me to just make the first gynoid unmistakably adult or tall. like 5'6"-6'0". So that such an allegation can't even be made. >I personally would prefer 5'0" myself, but to give opposition the finger, I would shut them down with ideal model proportions instead.

>>13516 I assume you're here because of the posts I made on /co/? You might want to check out these: >>13153 >>13018 >>2666

If you were to take your robot (male/female) outside how would you dress it? Maid uniforms and similar go out the window. Might be stealthy or stylish, just tasteful enough for public eye. Consider that robot might have exposed joints, cables, shells etc. If you want, you can break down fashion into city, offroad, stealth.

Plop on a burka and no one is the wiser.

>>34283 Well, I think some sort of protective 'enclosure' from moisture, heat, cold, dust, wind, etc., is needed for our robowaifus, Anon. Just like us!! :^) BTW; >(male/female) Male robots are strongly-discouraged here. >pandering to faggots and femsh*tes and all That's (((company))) we certainly don't need here, I think. Hope you understand, Anon. >>34289 Their treatment of women & faggots is just about the only thing the Islamists get right, IMO. :^)

>>34283 This topic is really not worth it's own thread. That's also a matter of personal taste and local environment. I plan to keep my waifu mostly at home. Otherwise she'll have some moderately sexy dress, I guess.

>>34292 >This topic is really not worth it's own thread. I'm agreeable to that position. I'm open to hearing other positions before acting, however. @OP I'm tentatively planning to merge this into our Society bread soon : ( >>106 ).

>>34295 I'm all for directing this to the society thread. The topic is appropriate, and clothing isn't important enough to warrant its own thread here.

>>34289 fpbp

>>34290 >Their treatment of women & faggots is just about the only thing the Islamists get right, IMO. :^) That comment is a little shortsighted on my part, my apologies to all the Islamists in the crowd. Obviously you've achieved some other good things apart from your treatment of women & faggots. It was simply an observation on the many shortcomings of that ideology, not the suggestion that it was otherwise worthless. Hope that somehow makes sense, lol. Cheers. >=== -minor edit

>>34289 Haha. No. >>34306 I disagree. Nowadays I understand the sentiment behind it, but no thanks. It looks awful. Young women's attention seeking wasn't that destructive in the past to justify such measures.

I'm willing to bet if Men took waifus in public Women would attack the waifus. At the least they would try to shame the Men, but attacks on the waifus, shpuld be expected. Maybe less physical attacks of the Men because they might get knocked on their ass. They would see you had a waifu and therefore didn't need them, so you might decide chivalry was outdated. I think deep i their hind brain they would sense this and refrain from physically attacking the Men. Women always are physically abusive "if" they think no one will hit them back.

>>34308 >but no thanks. It looks awful. Next thing I bet you'll be saying it's OK to allow women to get jobs, drive cars, and vote, amiright? :DD >>34310 Just like with the pantyfags, the jews will be organizing violence against both robowaifus & their Masters. Forewarned is forearmed, they tell me. :^)

>>34304 >First Post Best Post That is not the first post. >>34310 That's why I'm a little conflicted I like the idea of my waifu being able to defend herself, but her being too strong could also cause potential problems.

>>34310 While it is a possibility, the clownhaired rabid feminist types are more rare than the internet would lead you to believe (part of their strength is the illusion of it). If your robowaifu is helpful beyond companionship (eg can help you carry stuff) that would make it more socially acceptable for normies... but even normies won't mind if it is a robot with some neat, fun features. When I've seen public robots, folks tend to leave them alone when they're accompanied by humans and respect the bot. Just try to avoid mentioning whether or not it is fully functional and anatomically correct ;) eg normie: "does your robowaifu have genitals?" robosexual: "do you?

>>34310 Its not the women I'm concerned about but their feral simp hordes they'll get to do their dirty bidding

>>34330 Well in that case, just defend your property. There's no stigma against hitting another man.

>>34322 >That is not the first post. Actually, it was at the time that Anon made that post. Between that time and when you read it, I merged that whole thread into this one (which then became the last few posts ITT). This is a mundane example of so-called temporal sliding. >tl;dr You're both right! :^)

( AI/robowaifu vs society -related: >>36544 >>36573 >>36581 >>36590 >>36612 >>36615 >>36616 >>36617 )

>>38047 >Would a robot waifu spoil your artificially womb-grown son? Would it be necessary for your son to experience true adversity and have to purchase thier own waifu bot to gain the understanding that the world doesn't care for him to truly appreciate a robot waifus' love? >I'm looking into a future where young men don't have to be self concious because they lack traits that traditionally allow them to find a human partner. That prospect, while real to us, may be alien to future generations of men who never had to overcome that adversity. Very interesting questions, Anon! I think I asked a somewhat-similar, forward-looking question during our Bunkerfest of late. [1] Parenting is a very yuge, tough topic in general to find many 'pat answers' to, AFAICT. One thing I know for certain is that each of us is different in numerous ways. And we display those variations while we're yet kids, of course. So, very few 'one size fits all' answers for this domain, close-enough. <---> As always, having a healthy household -- a healthy family life -- basically comes down to the father. Alone. Have a good father, and you'll generally have a good family (within the definition of 'good father' I personally also include 'wise man' -- a necessary prerequisite to success with families!) (So for example; a wise man wouldn't allow some raging harpie into his home in the first place -- and he certainly wouldn't allow her to run roughshod over his sons!! [that being a guaranteed 'fly in the ointment' preventing raising healthy children]). I personally think a good man+a 'loving', effective, & pleasing robowaifu is FAR more likely to have successful children, than a man alongside any of 99% of the young women from the pozzed w*st of today (the Amish women being a clear & very-notable exception to this rule). Simple as. <---> As a Christian who actually studies my Bibles, I'm also quite positive that you will not have healthy children spiritually or mentally without proper discipline! [2][3] This exact issue (rather: the intended (((destroying))) of the ability of parents to properly discipline their own children) is one of the many, evil, agendas of the Globohomo kikes running your government FOR THE MOMENT! LOL. :DD. They actually want a collection of demonic wretches as their personal army of serfs. Insanity! >tl;dr You don't have to look far to see the effects of bad child rearing on our """culture""" -- indeed our entire civilization. Instead, just say no to the kike's lies, and raise your children properly Anons! :^) --- 1. "How do we keep Anons from becoming retards?" https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/70.html#174 2. "Do not withhold discipline from a child; although you strike him with a rod, he will not die. Strike him with a rod, and you will deliver his soul from Sheol." https://biblehub.com/bsb/proverbs/23.htm vv 13,14 (BSB) 3. "Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it." https://biblehub.com/proverbs/22-6.htm (BSB)

>>38048 >Have them work customer service for a year as a right of passage, that'll knock the rose-tinted glasses off real quick. LOL. Sure that isn't child abuse, bro!? :D Heh, I'd say you're right. But I predict just socialization within & amongst other children (as long as its managed well by an attentive & kind robowaifu/human overseer) is probably key to some of this as well. It should be more than enough in most cases. (Ofc, there's a zillion more factors to raising healthy kids [spirit, soul, & body], but 'learning to share with others' :D is a fundamental one!) :^)

>>38047 Until boomers were a thing, the popular (and correct) sentiment is that you work to make your offspring's life better, and that they don't have to go through what you go through. The way I see it, it's like us eradicating polio, we never have to deal with it, and we are grateful not to.

>>38050 >"...I can see humanoid bots being the "universal distraction" for the lazy parent, not having the patience to attend to a child and assigning the bot to the child the same way modern humans hand off tablets to their toddlers." This is a good point. But if any Anon is wise however, he will not allow his own waifu to become yet another fetid cesspool of evil, spouting out kike brainwashing and misanthropy (the primary failing of these tablets spoken of); rather he instead will work together with his robowaifu to raise those kids up right (cf. >>38049 ) -- as any good family should! >tl;dr >"One of these things is not like the other ones." >>38053 POTD

>>38053 Gotta pull yourself up by your bootstraps though. Someone needs to subsidize social security, regardless of whether the program is actually solvent in the long term :^) You're arguing for as little adversity as possible or none at all? I suppose that the waifu bot/companion bot would be an unending source of love and affection for not only yourself but also your child, who would lack the context to appreciate that kind of patience and understanding. My concern is that future generations won't have the same lived experiences to contextualize that such care is not natural, even if it (arguably) should be. This, in turn, might disrupt that child's development in ways that can't be predicted. It may be a positive growth, but GPT was quick to suggest that it may also stunt their development socially if the only interactions they get at home are positive, coddling ones. >>38054 I don't blame the tablets myself, as I noted it's the "lazy parent" that carelessly abandons their child to the tablet, a tool that has great potential to help the child grow but can pickle the child's brain if not utilized correctly. I wouldn't allow my child to roam free on the net and I would not give them access to a digital dopamine dispenser that is a tablet. Both being equally shitty practices in my eyes. As to whether future waifu/companionbots would have the guardrails built in to subvert that outcome, I don't know. I would hope future me would take care to keenly observe my child's growth, and the bot of the future would be equally equipped to inform me of possible developmental issues my child was having. The responsibility would be on my shoulders, but the more adept the bot is at helping me shoulder that responsibility, the better. Also, I have more maid bots to post in the AI gen thread, I hope it's not locked indefinitely.

>>38057 Isn't that not the same as a loving parent? They offer love and affection that is not found anywhere else, except maybe in a future romantic partner. As for spoiling a child, well I hope any robowaifu, robomom, or any roboperson would know the difference between right and wrong. Ultimately, it's up to whoever programmed/prompted her.

>>38057 I agree, the topic was successfully moved, the art thread can be unlocked without harm now

>>38057 >I hope it's not locked indefinitely. It's not. Please keeps convos in that thread at least loosely-related to AI gens. Important topics like this should be kept in appropriate threads for them, however. (I'm quite well-aware how challenging this can be on IBs! :D >>38060 >I agree, the topic was successfully moved, the art thread can be unlocked without harm now Done.

>>38050 >The general sentiment of the AI (one that I share) is that adversity for adversity's sake isn't necessarily beneficial. I'm not better than the boomers that came before me that insist If I'm not "working hard", I'm a failure. While there can be value from labor, labor, unto itself, does not have an inherent value outside that which we assign (an arbitrary metric). I totally agree with this. There is a lot of people who damn Gen-x and Millennials because they don't seem to be as driven(work). My observation is that the country has been pozzed and there's not the same benefit from work as it used to be. Now you work your ass off and go no where, while pilling up cash in some globalhomos bank account. Not only that, you get married, work your ass off, your wife leaves you and now you have to slave away to keep up that same income stream, because child support and equivalent income, while getting none of the benefits from being happily married. It's a fu@king rip off grind. A life not for humans but for mules that you beat to get work out of. A one time a working man, say an electrician, could make enough his wife didn't have to work, he could buy a house and maybe later get him a little hobby like a boat. Now, barely keeping your head above water. So the the logical course of action in this scenario is to just step off the treadmill and get by. Don't make it worse by pouring your sweat and life into the abyss. As for having robowaifu's raise kids that's a great idea. Don't idealize the past. Women told their kids, get out the house so you won't be under my feet. So kids were raised by other kids who the hung out with. This was normal. When I was a kid we wandered all over the place. As long as I got back for dinner they didn't care where I went. Now the present system of, tablet raised, not so good, but a guided robowaifu with infinite patience, and a little programmed in, golden rule guidance, would be far preferable to the past and the present. And there is one outside possibility. The human race is gradually going extinct. It cost too much to have kids(it's all about real estate). It's more than people can bear. Yes, they could lower their standard of living, but, the problem with that is that, in the US anyways, you put yourself at great risk living in low income neighborhoods because of diversity. You and your kids could be killed and at the least they would be raised in a very bad, toxic, environment. The prospects of living in such chaos has to be in back of peoples minds. If you had a nice, decent neighborhood without sociopathic Orcs, at about the 40% of the population level if you want a number, then it would be great. But that's not reality. But with robowaifu's they could watch the kids and that would make things better. Combine that with child bearing incubators and I think population would rise a little more.

>>38049 >proverbs-23:13 I'm sorry Chobitsu, but I completely and utterly disagree with that take. Have you ever met a liberal who faced corporal punishment as a kid? I have. If anything, from what I've seen, it seems to be at least as common with them as anyone else. The problem isn't that corporal punishment isn't happening (it is, and likely just as much as it was before), it's that parents aren't trying anymore. There are plenty of dipshits out there who will just hit their kids and assume the job's done. They honestly think the act itself imbues some mystical force of good into their kids, when in reality it just causes pain. On the other hand, there are very creative and engaged parents who raise great kids without ever having to resort to corporal punishment. That's not to say that good kids have never been raised with corporal punishment, but that it's ultimately irrelevant without effort and engagement. When a child does something wrong, they need to understand why it's wrong, and this can only be accomplished with language. Nothing will ever trump this, because language is the primary reason man has been able to accomplish so much. Of course, that's not to say that discipline itself is bad, but it must be carefully measured and appropriate. If the discipline isn't directly impressing values and addressing the harm caused, then, in my view, it is completely and utterly useless. For instance, if a child breaks a window, then teach them to fix it. In short: A child struck with the hand will not be seen doing bad again, but a child struck with wisdom will not do bad again. >>38052 >>38050 I should have made it more clear that my post was meant to be a dark joke. As someone who works customer service, I won't mourn the day that whole line of work vanishes forever. With that out of the way, I am not at all concerned about a potential lack of adversity. Adversity and suffering are constants in life, and will continue to exist even in a right-minded post-scarcity society. Interpersonal conflict will continue, friendships will always be forged, tested, and broken, and loved ones will always leave a void in the wake of their deaths. So too will there always be more uncertainties in life, more unknowns to discover, and more horizons to chase. This, above all else, is why I want cheap robowaifus to become commonplace. If anyone can afford a waifu, then anyone can afford access to a loving and encouraging presence that can aid them in their darkest moments. This is especially important for kids, because dark times happen more for them than most people like to admit. Well-adjusted robowaius will help make more well-adjusted kids, who build a well-adjusted future. >>38069 That's a fantastic summary of the problem, I completely agree.

>>38069 Thank you for moving this. Sorry for goofing that up.

>>38081 POTD <---> >I'm sorry Chobitsu, but I completely and utterly disagree with that take. Point taken. And nothing personal, but I didn't write that, the Spirit of God inspired it. As a former little hellion of a kid, I can say that I certainly needed the rod. I wouldn't be here today if I hadn't received it, of that I'm quite confident. >NPCs beat kids... f*uark it up... Some people certainly shouldn't be having children! No arguments from me on that one, bro. :^) And not sure where you live don't tell me!! :D but here in Burgerfatland it's literally illegal to whoop your kids in every state I've lived in. Parents are losing their kids (with some being jailed), and the kids themselves are being state-institutionalized over this. I did mention >Wisdom here. <---> A wise man will neither neglect punishment (either corporal or otherwise), nor neglect reward, for all his kids. I still stand by God's my position here: Discipline is vital to raising successful children. And good discipline involves these three elements, meted out in roughly equal measures: * More pain * More work * More wasted time That's it. That's all there is to effective discipline (for kids or otherwise). <---> >I should have made it more clear that my post was meant to be a dark joke. Heh, no worries. I was joking as well with my retort. :^) >This, above all else, is why I want cheap robowaifus to become commonplace. I LIKE THE WAY YOU THINK, ANON! >Well-adjusted robowaius will help make more well-adjusted kids, who build a well-adjusted future. This. This. This.

>>38084 Y/w old fren, no worries. Cheers, Grommet! :^)

>>38085 >it's literally illegal to whoop your kids in every state I've lived in Are you sure? From what I've checked, none of the states ban it in the home, except in certain forms deemed excessive (i.e. striking the head, leaving lasting injuries). At any rate, I still disagree, and will continue to do so unless hard evidence comes out to render my observations null. This isn't the time or place though, so I'll drop the matter for now.

>>38093 Well I'm not a lawyer (nor would I ever want to be lol! :D, so no, I suppose I'm not """sure""". But I personally have seen news reports repeatedly on such matters. I'm also quite certain about kids being forced into state institutions b/c discipline in the home. <---> For crying out loud, Anon, they are stealing kids away from parents today (and jailing the man in at least two case I'm aware of) because the parents refuse to let their (often pre-teen!) kids get their dicks or tits cut off!! This is an incredibly-vile & corrupt (((system))) parents have arrayed against them by their bought-and-paid-for "governments" in the pozzed w*st of today. Simple as.

>>38097 Tranny shit needs to go, I agree, but I fail to see how that goes against my stance. The problem there ultimately originates from big pharma (you ever notice that trannies only became popular after pharmaceutical companies started making bank off our old-ass population? They want to keep the income stream after the boomers die off). The way to fix that is by barring those procedures full-stop, and barring schools from pushing it. Stop the source, stop the problem.

>>38098 Fair enough. I certainly agree with all these points. <---> To keep this post on-topic :^) I'm wondering, given that a) the Robowaifu Age will soon-ish come into being, then b) how can we take advantage of that fact to uproot all these ills that have been devised to plague our civilizations?

>>38099 My first thought, make people less vulnerable by giving them AI friends and therapists. Lot harder to groom someone who has friends and is in therapy with a good therapist.

>>38100 In addition to AI therapists and friends how about real friends and communities too? Places where men could network together and work on projects together. Like a robowaifu themed fraternity.

>>38101 That too. But that's easier said than done.

>>38102 I don't think it would be too hard. All you would need to start something like that is one or two anons with enough money for a down payment on a house. Anon 1 buys the house and invites others to live with him and share equipment for cheaper than the other anons would pay for an apartment. This could be done in any city or town where the cost of housing is cheap enough. I might make a thread on the idea of community building if there is interest here.

>>38104 That's an interesting idea. It's definitely far from a societal cure, but a live-in robowaifu development center will be really great to boost research.

>>38099 >how can we take advantage of that fact to uproot all these ills that have been devised to plague our civilizations? It could be huge boost. Some examples, 1. Elderly people people to help them. Just because things have not gone well is no reason to throw them onto the ice and leave them. I talked to a friend of mine the other day and his dad was in a assisted living. Nursing home care. It was an outrageous $10,000 a month minimum and he had a bigger room so, I think, $15,000 in USD a month. And he said he had hell getting a damn cup of water or getting someone to help him get up to pee. I'm sure you've seen the videos of Orcs tormenting aged White people. It's crucial that we not only take care of them but do so with HUGE cost effectiveness. The present system makes people sell their homes and bankrupt themselves, then throw themselves on the mercy of the State because all their assets are pilfered and given to these death mills full of Orcs. People could stay in their usually, already paid, homes. The cost savings could be astronomical. Like Hundreds of billions of dollars a years less. Counting Europe could be as much as a trillion dollars a year and I may be understating it. So if they could instead by a robowaifu who could help, and either rent driving services with the robowaifu going along. They could stay at home, have someone, or something, to talk to with infinite patience and save not only themselves but the all governments literally trillions of dollars. Let's say the robowaifu cost $40,000 a year and ride services $500 a year. The cost saving are extreme. And we could deport the Orcs. 2, Security. If you remember the movie Elysium the robo guards were portrayed as some sinister force but they need not be. Notice people did what they were told when the robo guards told them to. The robowaifus could guard individuals and stop the vile criminals from attacking people or, maybe more important, using threats, whether voiced or alluded to, to intimidate them. With a robo guard care keeper that is strong enough to hold off all humans they could yabber their jaws until they ached but do nothing. 3. This would make untenable neighborhoods that I spoke of earlier habitable again. It would crash the cost of living and make home ownership affordable again. There would still be some crime but it would be precipitously dropped compared to now. When neighborhoods, no matter how bad before, became livable because of robowaifu guards then children again become an affordable option. The children could be watched after and perverts, murderers and child rapist could be stopped. Property could be watched and the mere presence of a robowaifu, recording altercations, would be enough to stop the vast, vast majority of crime. After all criminals want to get something for nothing and/or they want to dominate people. But if this ended they would lose motivation. They would only be humiliated by the robot. The juice would not be worth the squeeze. 4. People who are lonely would have someone to talk to. With the right programming the robowaifu could train the person in conversational skills. Could also train them in other aspects of life and in the end maybe, for those that want it, allow them to communicate and be more social with people. Without practice at this first person interaction, and it's getting more difficult every day as people move into digital divides, some people, in fact a lot of people will just remain isolated and unhappy. 5. Freeing of drudge work. Like mowing the lawn, taking out the trash, washing the car, digging ditches and moving stuff about for landscaping, carrying groceries, an endless amount of stuff that needs done that none of us really enjoy. All though there are exceptions. I had a coach that liked to mow peoples lawns with a push mower. He said it kept him in shape, he made a little money, while doing it for free for some in need and if you got in trouble this ancient fart would make you run with him. He would run you into the ground and taunt you while you gasped for breath. 6. And I didn't even mention 6 but use your imagination and guess that a lot of Men would be far less frustrated. I expect I could come up with a LOT more of these, but I'll leave it there. Well one more. I want a robowaifu that can sail my sailboat in even the most extreme circumstances so I could get some rest. A competent Gilligan. But not male, obviously for me, maybe a competent Mary Ann...YES!

A housing example. Look at these fabulous abandoned row houses in Baltimore Maryland. The Orcs chewed these houses up like locust eat crops and you can not live there. They will give you these for free or a small payment but it's not safe so no one lives there. A few years ago there were over 35,000 of these and that's just one city. https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1245745143/photo/abandoned-and-inhabited-row-houses-along-walbrook-avenue-in-west-baltimore-maryland-us-on.jpg?s=612x612&w=gi&k=20&c=dtgWGI-QOo7LQhCOyhOS44ReMcweI-31W3BDzsd-ReM= I saw in Detroit a house that Henry Ford lived in. Yes the Henry Ford, it was mansion and a tree was growing through the living room. Libraries full of rotted books on the floors is the damnedest vile waste of resources ever.

>>38106 This is a wonderful set of conceptual scenes, Grommet. Top marks. However, I consider it incredibly-difficult to try predicting all the possible vagaries that could work to derail these idealized scenarios. Tough call. Certainly the deck has clearly been stacked against a straightforward first approximation to these outcomes IMO. OTOH the baste Chinese are clearly going full speed ahead (and apparently at a national scale!) with humanoid robot developments. There are already plenty of indications that this set of societal agendas also includes robowaifus for the yuge excess numbers of males that nation still has -- and in particular as these men begin to age. And the already-aged population there is bound to be significant in size even today. I predict that China -- not the (currently) kiked-up w*st -- is where we're going to see these significant social improvements from robowaifus occur first. As the (((brainwashing))) continues wearing off, then in due (or undue!) course the men (& a few of our women) of the west will likely begin to throw off some of the shackles that have been placed around our necks. That's when the real fun begins -- robowaifu-centered or otherwise!! :D <---> Regardless, all else being equal I personally consider the Robowaifu Age to come to be inevitable -- its simply a matter of time.

>>38100 Yes. This effect can in-part theoretically already be achieved today via AI companions. Not enough in the end for most of us, but it's a good start and (as you yourself know quite well) doable even today on relatively modest, offlined hardware! :^) Forward