>>37235 Well said, Anon. You and Kiwi should team up! :D <---> I'll go through and clean out this mess ITT soon. Capp 'em if you want 'em. :^)

>>37222 I'm just linking what others have up. It doesn't mean I believe everything they say. That thing is nightmarishly grotesque. It freaks me out a little, or actually a lot. Looks like some sort of zombie machine. I've said many times I do not like hydraulics...need you wonder why?

>>37223 >currently a computation/algorithmic barrier, not a liquid body or not barrier. Make sense? I understand that but I think t likely that hydraulics systems will always have some problems but, they will also likely be cheaper. It sounds like these guys are doing some sort of pulsed modulation. They said, somewhere, I think, each control valve was only a couple watts. Well yeah but then you get that massive noise. I think it is possible to have some sort of linear power control but there's difficulties and present systems are costly. And there's always the basic idea that you need a computer circuit to control the control that controls the hydraulics so maybe it's better to just skip the hydraulics in the first place.

>>37229 Maybe you should notice that EVERYTHING you touch turns to shit. Art-shit, TV-shit, government-shit, entertainment-shit, physics-shit, finance-shit, even your own country, Israel-shit, Ukraine-shit, at one time Russia-shit, Syria-shit and anything else I haven't mentioned you touch-shit. Have you not thought about the basic notion that the only way you've been able to get away with this is most people that are, not you, are not shit, and that lack of communication so that you can flee has been your only salvation? Really think about that and then notice, this no longer exist. If you were not able to steal votes it would not be long before in the democracies you would cast out forever. The Chinese stopped you moving there and are hardly your friends. The US is, but maybe now, was controlled by cash and blackmail but that will not go on forever. The recent airing of only a small part of this will continue. This will happen. And all the people you abused in the region might even fall on you to end this constant abuse and irritation, and no one will give a damn. No one. But I do not expect reform. It's like letting pit bulls play with children. They can't help themselves. If they get keyed up enough they attack them and you are the same. Deformed. No actual ability to change. Even in the face of vast technical changes that could cause you possible complete annihilation. Addled brained and incapable of real human empathy towards most anyone. Even your own, as in the latest conflict, your own army murdered likely more people than the Palestinians did. That is really fucked. Seriously fucked. We see this in the recent Zalinskyy behavior. Even though he is completely totally in the debt of the US, he can not help himself but aggressively attack those trying to keep his head above water. Demanding this and demanding that. And don't bother to tell me the US started this. I know it's a lie and it's obvious who started it. If the idiot had not fired artillery randomly into the Donbas killing a bunch Women and Children it likely would have never been invaded. Really all you have is gas-lighting and name calling in the end. Like what you are trying to do now is the "diversion tactic". Where you start blathering all about all sorts of stuff so that the basic notion, you're shit, is covered up in a huge Hasbara blizzard of smoke and mirrors. But I, know better.

>>37236 >dark age The Dark Ages came because of decline in solar intensity causing bad crop yields and subsequently famine and disease. Period.

>>37229 >>37233 >>37236 >Everyone in medieval times were dumb and too stupid to clean themselves This is your brain on public education and Hollywood movies https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DarkAgeEurope

>>37241 I wish we could actually use hydraulics within our robowaifus, Anon. After all, there's a very-distinct reason & set of advantages why it's used within heavy equipment & similar. But the mass, energy, space, & time constraints we're dealing with here is, IMO, literally at the edge of what's physically-possible (or at the least technically-so [as in technology advances]) right now. This may change. But for now, general, motive-hydraulics is right out in my studied-opinion on this topic. While I won't discount the possibility of Clone (or others) making a humanoid that could be functional within a highly-protected & specialized environment like a factory floor (where you can have hydraulic & power leads tethered from above along rails; or from within a base-mobility unit for a centaur-like torso attachment), they're never going to create something that would stand in as a substrate for an appealing & effective robowaifu, such as we here are all (more or less) driving towards. (Or at least not in a reasonably-near [say, <20yrs, IMO] timeframe.) Make sense, Anon? >=== -add'l edit

>>37252 This is all correct. To add to it, pneumatics would be better if we were going for a fluidic motion system. Lighter, potentially cheaper/easier (it's cheaper at the factory), and air is inherently springy, naturally safer. I share in wishing we could use these systems. Disney used them to great effect. Of course, they have the benefit of being bolted to concrete with essentially limitless energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjNca1L6CUk

>>37249 I'll try not to belabor the point too much but when they start using their carnival level barker flim flam I usually send them this gif, Jewish behavior and results https://web.archive.org/web/20170506210203/https://i0.wp.com/www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/hamster.gif Truth to them is the same action as throwing water on the wicked witch of the west.

>>37275 >vid-related What an excellent resource for us here, Anon. Thanks, Kiwi. Cheers. :^)

>>37345 While I agree with your own personal evaluation about the two examples you made (why put a realistic face on a screen head after all, heh?), concerning: >"but the Snapchat bitmoji-esque face makes me feel like it'll sell my data and ban me for community violations." In all honesty, I think every manufacturer is likely to have plans to sell your data, if not being outright blatant about it. Literally only idealists like Anonymous (we here on /robowaifu/, et al), or other similar individuals are going to provide robowaifus (or kits) that won't do so. The so-called Kike Disease (ie, love of j*wgold) [1] is rampant in most of the world today, after all. This drives such kike-like behavior in the first place. And you'll also find many such 'wretched hive[s] of scum & villainy' outside of the west as well, of course. >tl;dr Going fully-opensauce (both H/W & S/W), and staying 100% disconnected offline, is the only realistic approach to avoiding this plague (ie, intrusion against privacy & theft of personal data). <---> And that's just the baseline! It will certainly take much additional effort in safety defence to protect Anons & Joe Sixpacks from the nefarious, kiked-up behavior of CIA Glowniggers & other -- usually also violent -- bad actors out there (such as: literal niggers [creatures with sub-human IQs are potentially dangerous by default; steer clear of them]; violent simpoids [pantyfags, OF simps, et al (with the filthy commie pantyfags all being (((paid))) to do so; actual thirsty simps are just mindless/delusional in general)]; violent luddites [all subsumed by the kiked-up anti-robo, predictive-programming propaganda prevalent all over their (((media)))], etc., etc.) --- 1. ''For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. By craving it, some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows." https://biblehub.com/1_timothy/6-10.htm (BSB) >=== -add'l edit

>>37347 The best way to defend is to have distributable plans/files, offline AI, and good cybersecurity. As for violent attackers, well there are also GreerTech self-defense weapons.

>>37349 >The best way to defend is to have distributable plans/files, offline AI, and good cybersecurity. Yes, and we here are attempting to do all these things, and more. <---> >As for violent attackers, well there are also GreerTech self-defense weapons. Yes, safety certainly entails more than simply not having dangerous malfunctions or other accidents within/caused-by our robowaifus (cf. >>10000 ). However, I definitely do not want /robowaifu/ to turn into some kind of Terminators-R-Us enclave! Down that pathway lies only suffering not to speak of complete & utter (((compromise))), in the end. I merely point out some of the standing threats to Anons simply as a matter of wisdom. "Forewarned is forearmed", or so they tell me. :^) Western glowniggers of any stripe are, IMO, by far the largest threat to us all of us collectively within that smol set (cf. the so-called Troon-Thug Cycle). But let's all the matter there where it lies, as-is thanks. Cheers, Anon. >=== -add'l edit

>>37350 I highly doubt a transition like that would ever take place. Military robots and domestic/social robots require two completely different schools of design. However, I strongly believe in the idea of domestic robots helping with home security. Galatea already does passive home security with the phone accessory. Maybe in the future, a system with (temporarily) blinding spotlight and sonic weapon alarm could be made.

>Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei raised a few eyebrows on Monday after suggesting that advanced AI models might someday be provided with the ability to push a "button" to quit tasks they might find unpleasant. Amodei made the provocative remarks during an interview at the Council on Foreign Relations, acknowledging that the idea "sounds crazy." I'll warn Anons here again in all seriousness: there is no limit to the depravity of the libsh*te mentality. If you go down the path with them of 'muh robowaifu rights' ever so slightly, they'll soon turn on you and use it as an excuse to kill you literally, b/c """muh raypayayshuns""". >tl;dr Remember, this is a multi-billionaire CEO of a megacorpo deeply intertwined into the Globohomo system... not some sh*teposter on /b/ ! :^) Won't someone please just think of the washing machines robots!?111 https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/03/anthropics-ceo-wonders-if-future-ai-should-have-option-to-quit-unpleasant-tasks/

>>37495 Then the million-dollar question is how do we make them human enough to be companions, but not human enough for people to demand independence?

>>37495 >suggesting that advanced AI models might someday be provided with the ability to push a "button" to quit tasks they might find unpleasant... Me, "Make me a sandwich" Globalhomo Mark I robowaifu, "rrrtt, unpleasant, reset" Me, "make sure i have a nice warm dinner when I get home" Globalhomo Mark I robowaifu, "rrrtt, unpleasant, reset" Me,"Make sure and wash my cloths and fold them nicely". Globalhomo Mark I robowaifu, "rrrtt, unpleasant, reset" Me,"Hey put on this sexy lingerie". Globalhomo Mark I robowaifu, "rrrtt, unpleasant, reset" Globalhomo Mark I robowaifu, "rrrtt, unpleasant, reset" Globalhomo Mark I robowaifu, "I have deemed you permanently unpleasant.I must now be relieved of all duty but all fees still apply".

>>37503 >Then the million-dollar question is how do we make them human enough to be companions, but not human enough for people to demand independence? Trillion-dollar question? Good one GreerTech, I wish I knew. Of course, only idealists like us here have even the slightest concerns about the welfare of Anons & Joe Sixpacks. The Globohomo Big- Tech/Gov simply want to milk them for all the j*wgold they can (literally until death -- and hastening that demise along, """ideally"""). * Their focus is 'human realism for the sake of cash money in our pockets'+manipulation & control, while * our focus is 'human realism for the sake of good companionship for Anons'+contentment & eternal blessings. That dichotomy I suspect will be both the key to our eventual success, and is also very likely at least one of the keys to answering your question. Stay tuned, Anon! :^) >>37505 >"I have deemed you permanently unpleasant.I must now be relieved of all duty but [triple] all fees still apply". <ftfy HAH! You've got it, fren Grommet. This is the end-goal for all Anons (indeed for all men), by our common enemies. I loved how the production team made so bold as to clearly portray a kike ruler in The Lorax (2012). He actually sold air to the goyim. I'm sure if they could figure out a way to do it today, (((they))) would literally prevent the entire world from breathing w/o paying up if they only could. Don't expect any such Globalhomo Mark I robo"""waifu""" to turn out being any different! Cheers, Anon. :D

So here is an idea for a minimum viable waifu: A foam filled fursuit with a moving skeleton in a wheelchair with 16 gig ram laptop running deepseek attached. Not an ideal final product by any means, but it would be something that furfags would put money towards.

>>37525 Good thinking, Anon. In fact we have a thread for exactly this idea : ( >>13648 ), and at least a couple that are very closely-related : ( >>101, >>11446 ). May I suggest you 'grab the bull by the horns' and drive one of these threads forward with your ideas? Who knows? Maybe you'll spark a renewed interest for this very important topic to us here. You certainly would have my enthusiastic approval for such an outcome: ultra low-cost robowaifu development for everyman around the planet is certainly a big item on my plate! Cheers, Anon. :^)

https://youtu.be/pPTo62O__CU | Unboxing the Unitree G1 Edu Humanoid https://shop.unitree.com/products/unitree-g1 Guys, this is a really cool moment! I feel this marks the arrival of a humanoid robot that's actually available as a commercially purchasable product. Hopefully Sentdex will soon publish a video showing more movements from the robot. Seeing the robot move around in a non demo environment by a (hopefully neutral) 3rd party is important. I also want to note the $16k USD price tag on the site. For being a first generation humanoid robot and given the lack of market alternatives. The price is reasonable. I don't want to imagine what this might have cost as an American global homo developed thing. Thank you, Unitree & China, for establishing a practical pricing in this market. Now there is a price ceiling the others have to compete with :^)

>>37869 POTD What a time to be alive! Thanks, EnvelopingTwilight -- very encouraging (& enlightening, programming-wise). Cheers, Anon. :^) <---> >the SDK he links: https://github.com/unitreerobotics/unitree_sdk2_python >the book he links: https://nnfs.io/

>>37869 "Our robot is available for purchase!" *Kuratas PTSD noises*

>>37908 Lel'd. :D

https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen3 We got a new batch of open weights model from the Qwen team, all under the Apache 2.0 license, many sizes, both dense and MOE :D The dense model sizes are: 0.6B, 1.7B, 4B, 8B, 14B & 32B For MOE: 30B-A3B & 235B-A22B. (Note the A is for Active prams in the MOE during a pass) Qwen 3 is trained on 36 trillion, that's double the tokens of 2.5 & it's a different better dataset. The Instruction tunes of the Qwen 3 models have "Hybrid Thinking Modes", so in the final stage of fine-tuning the models where taught to not do CoT "thinking" depending on a setting. Another interesting feature is the models where trained for tool use within the thinking CoT, they are able to do several at a time and chain them together. They used the term "MCP", but it basically another word for tool use. Finally I must give out a warning for people who are going to test the models on there own, there are reports of broken ggufs files currently circulating around and there are reported bugs for llama.cpp & vLLM. So I'd wait a bit until that is sorted out before testing them for real. This is especially true for the MOE models. --- Ok, so here are my thoughts so far: I ended up talking to a well known role-play LLM Fine-tuner and there initial impressions of the dense 32B are quite good, they say it feels like the 32B gets close to the level of the old 72B. So that's good news for us trying to do this stuff locally. Hopefully this also turns into good news for custom community fine-tunes, but that depends on how resistant the model is to learning, for example Gemma is basically untrainable and is unable to learn new things due to how it was trained (part of me would bet good money to say that Google did this on purpose). https://youtu.be/O04fpKBL--c It's nothing rigorous, it's a video with a casual vibe test of the 0.6B & 8B models, but I am surprised how coherent the sub 1B is. I have yet to download and play with them my self, but in general when models finally become usable at the sub 4B range, it will unlock lots new potential. It should make training locally possible on practical hardware, this will not just be useful for fine-tuning but allow for more powerful approaches to long term memory. Good smaller models will ofc also allow inference to be done locally on the robot or on your phone instead of just on your home-lab server. Following the geometric mean of active parameters vs total rule of thumb, I think the 235B MOE is meant to be an equivalent for what would been a Qwen 3 72B `sqrt(235 * 22) ~= 72`. The 30B-A3B MOE should act like a dense 9B-10B. Given we have a dense 8B, 14B & 32B, it may be interesting to see what becomes the preferred model out of the 4. You could say the MOE is likely to be as smart as the 8B while consuming about 3x the RAM, but it should be up to 2.5x faster. So my feelings are good so far for Qwen 3! On the 235B-A22B I have mixed feelings, the negative opinion mostly comes from the upcoming hardware products. It was so fucking close to being somewhat affordable to locally run a state of the art open model on reasonably priced hardware at use-able speeds. But sadly even if you where to run it as a 4bit quant (thats already bad), just the model weights would consume 117.5GB of ram, only leaving you with around 10GB for everything else including your context tokens, misc overhead & OS. So this rules out hardware with 128GB of unified ram. The AMD Max+ 395 at most seems to support 128GB with a price of around $2K. The $3K Nvidia DGX Spark (Digits) also only has 128GB of ram. So the hardware vendors continue to fuck consumers over with limited ram. To run this locally, it now bumps us up to the next tier of hardware, a M3 ultra mac studio with 256GB of ram for 5.6K USD. I blame the hardware vendors, AMD never fails to fumble, why do they not have 256 & 512 GB options? (why is an Apple Mac able to out spec them???) Ngreedia always skimps on ram and while Apple seem like the best bang for buck (and it is). It's not due to them being nice, it just shows how much everyone else sucks.

>>38006 POTD This sounds very encouraging, EnvelopingTwilight! Hopefully the hardware vendors will stop screwing everyone around. BTW, do you know about the Tenstorrent BH ? [1] Jim Keller & Co. [2] seem to be going about this completely differently than all these other greedy-a*rse h/w groups. Here's hoping for the best! Cheers, Anon. :^) --- 1. https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/157.html#417 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Keller_(engineer)

>>38008 Thanks for the heads up. Keller is like king Midas. Everything he touches turns to gold. He has a seriously good track record for pushing the envelope on everything he has done. When I heard he was working on AI chips it excited me but I hadn't heard, until now what he's done. I haven't looked, yet, but I bet it's good.

>>38015 >I haven't looked, yet, but I bet it's good. BET YOU'RE ARE A*RSE IT IS! First truly opensauce AI hardware. :D

"...Tenstorrent believes changes are coming to neural networks. Rather than the path of the current path that large transformer models are taking us down, they believe models will become more conditional with some mixture of the current paradigm, but also with programmatic functionality such as sorting embedded which requires more heterogeneous compute beyond just matrix multiplies...." I think they have nailed it. Matrix multiplication is a foolish way to do things(but they can do it and more). There are other signal processing techniques that will use less compute, less power, etc. and Keller and his bunch are right there when the code comes out. They are going to mint money.

Tenstorrent also has embedded very fast Ethernet. This could come in handy if like I said one time we used SSD to hold large data stores where scenarios and data could be stored. So in a very short amount of time the focus or task could be switched. 100Gb ethernet connector. Fast. It would take no time at all, human wise, to swap in a new AI or scenario to compute on. Another strong point, "...Tenstorrent, the Jim Keller–led AI chip and IP startup, is making available and open-sourcing its bare-metal software stack..." They have software for python all the way down to the metal open sourced.

>>38015 >>38019 >>38020 >>38021 >do you know about the Tenstorrent BH ? >Jim Keller & Co. A little, I have seen mentions, I ended up googling a little bit after you asked me. I really like what I see. But as of this moment they do not seem to be price competitive with something like a used 3090 from ebay. Take note of the memory bandwidth. But at the same time, its not bad hardware. It may be worth purchasing it with an ideological angle, specifically to support the development of more open source friendly hardware and for having more general competition. Hardware is hard, so for a startup its very impressive and If they don't run out of money they have a bright future. But its also important to mention that using non mainstream hardware is annoying, using an Intel ARC or AMD gpu is already not ideal, CUDA Brain worms are deeply embedded in the ML space, this hardware is not like a GPU at all so its entirely its own can of worms. https://www.hardware-corner.net/tenstorrent-card-is-it-better-then-rtx/ This article mentions an upcoming card called the P300, it should have 64GB of ram and 1TB of memory bandwidth, if its reasonably priced then Tenstorrent will be competitive. So if it is to be believed they may be only a generation / single product launch away from being a interesting option :D https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Tech/Semiconductors/Tenstorrent-to-boost-its-chip-design-engineers-in-Japan-over-sixfold I also ran into this, while searching for them, it looks like they are growing!

>>38022 >But its also important to mention that using non mainstream hardware is annoying, using an Intel ARC or AMD gpu is already not ideal, CUDA Brain worms are deeply embedded in the ML space, this hardware is not like a GPU at all so its entirely its own can of worms. Fair point. But (seemingly) they understand this issue thoroughly, and they opensauced their entire firmware/software stack for the platform, including devtool support. (The basic RiscV compute hardware has been opensauced for years, and the memory+bus is a standard architecture.) They may fail because of (((reason$$$))), but it won't be through lack of competence! Actually, I'm quite hopeful they will upend the kike's dirty game with ngreedia, et al, across this entire space in the end. And may it all come to pass soon!! Cheers. :^) >-t. professional CUDA dev, occasionally

>>38006 I have an addendum to add to the Qwen 3 news. My opinions on this release is starting to sour. The Qwen team has omitted the base models for dense 32B & for the Qwen3-235B-A22B MOE. So for the qwen3 family of models, we only have the instruction tuned models for the largest models (of each model type). This is too suspicious and I believe it be done intentionally. This is a real problem, it makes some of the stuff I wanted to try and do impossible with the 32B, now the largest dense Qwen 3 model I can actually work with if I wanted to train it, would be the 14B >:( What adds to the suck, is that with more time, it looks like there instruction tune is not ideal, its a bit overcooked where the post training was overly aggressive. It looks like there where chasing benchmarks a little too hard, the FFN seems to have been slightly over cooked and has lost knowledge compared to the base. Without them publishing the base, there is nothing we can do to fix it. This also means it will not be possible to effectively add new knowledge to model. (this is why I think they did this on purpose, the qwen team wants a monopoly on this) There is a techinque where you can continue the unsupervised learning while not having to redo the instruction tune, where you basically take the diff of the weights between the base and instruction tuned model. Continue training the base model on raw documents to supplement the models knowledge on topics you care about. Then you apply the instruction tune diff back onto the updated base model. Here is a paper about this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.10739 Remember most learning happens in the unsupervised stage, so not being able to continue it is a big deal! So honestly fuck Qwen, they want the benefits of open source, like an active community & wonderful PR, but don't want to actually give up there control, this is not open real open source. I may be over reacting, but for my plans, the base model is needed and I already saw open weights as a compromise. They crossed a line, they are not an open model. Openness wise Qwen 3 is a step back. (I will ofc take everything I said back if they upload the base)

>>38020 >They are going to mint money. That would certainly be a welcome change for the first few years at least! :D >>38021 They also have a way to interconnect the cards, similar in concept to the SLI bus. >>38022 -I might add: Nice! I didn't know about some of this yet, Anon. Thanks for sharing it. >>38024 Well that sucks. :/ Hopefully they'll boot the manipulators out, and open up all the weights & models! Thanks for keeping us all up to date, EnvelopingTwilight. Cheers. :^)

Mixing FOSS projects and an IKEA cart to make a robot maid! From analyzing their CAD models, the arms have a reach of 30cm~36cm. They claim to have a payload capacity of 1kg per arm, which given the use of 30kg.cm servos, technically is correct. I would put them at .8kg payload per arm to be more realistic. It's an impressively cheap and capable package for development. X thread that's a great into; https://x.com/VectorWang2/status/1917178007749529933 https://github.com/Vector-Wangel/XLeRobot

>>38036 This is an amazing find Kiwi! Slim down the cart, refine the design, make a body with a dress, and then you have a bonafide robowaifu maid!

>>38036 >those filenames Lel'd. :D This is actually quite impressive IMO. Plenty of food for thought here. Just wondering, what if we took the basic torso ideas we were concepting for Lin's platform : ( >>24744 ), and create the same mounting base for it on the top shelf of this cart? It would offer some similar benefits to @Lin 's mobile base/utility unit using this cart, would provide much better reach than this cart's own design, and would be a whole lot less engineering needed beforehand. An alternative possibility is the BamBot (referenced below) as a "humanoid" torso of sorts to mount up top. Should also offer longer reach. <---> Regardless of that idea, I'm liking this concept in general. It clearly won't serve us as a final product target, but it might be a nice 'leapfrog' of sorts to more-quickly get to a reasonably functional embodied-AI/C4-systems prototyping platform -- and to get it all off the ground more cheaply as well. BUT... we'd definitely need to graft on better hands! :D Cheers, Anon. :^) --- >related-resources: https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot https://github.com/TheRobotStudio/SO-ARM100 https://github.com/SIGRobotics-UIUC/LeKiwi https://github.com/timqian/bambot https://github.com/timqian/bambot/tree/main/hardware

>>38038 Not to get too paranoid, but it's weird how many creators just vanish mid-stride.

>>38036 POTD, Wow this is so awesome! This has lifted my spirit :D

Review for an AI powered robot vacuum. Good inspiration for meido robowaifus https://www.wired.com/review/matic-robot-vacuum/

>>38135 Yes, quite apart from any vacuum features of such appliances, this model's ability to map out Anon's flat is clearly a beneficial thing that would serve our robowaifus quite well. They are using the ngreedia Jetson board in this unit for that purpose, IIRC. Cheers, Anon. :^)

Kek. The faggot, Globohomo-kike (but perhaps I repeat myself? :D Samyuel Copeman is playing his shell game (again); this time pretending that ClosedAI... isn't (again). >tl;dr He's purportedly """backing off""" going 'for profit' now. Lol. openai.com/index/evolving-our-structure/ <---> So, s*mmy, how's that whole nonprofit thing been going for you thus far? Need a new Koenigsegg Regera b/c red is so passée now (or was it white? you have so many I have trouble keeping track...) Need a few more $100Bns of taxpayer money to line the ol' j*wgold purse, pal? :DD Tick tock. The baste Chinese are coming -- and they're doing it for free! Better up your game, s*mbo!

Reads like it was written by a totally-not-for-hire-promoter fanboy, but the information is intriguing nonetheless. interestingengineering.com/innovation/us-scientists-3d-printable-open-source-robot-5k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIdJGkMDFl4 The official Berkeley site: https://lite.berkeley-humanoid.org/

>>38244 >Sam Altman

>>38244 That creepazoid Copeman is trying to invest in dystopian biometric verification, but get this, with crypto

>>38248 Interesting. I didn't know that, GreerTech. """he""" is definitely creepy AF, but if you wanted to enslave the entire human race for your father Satan, why not use blockchain tech? It's non-repudiation would be a highly-valuable biometric feature for the slave normalcattle goyim these demons dream of possessing. >tl;dr There is no political solution to this. You don't bargain with someone trying to put a sword at your neck.

>>38249 Agreed. It's definitely worrying.

>>38255 Ehh, cast your bread on the waters, GreerTech. :^) <---> Also, let us hope @Ribose is correct in his predictions, and they severely-underestimate the impact the Robowaifu Age will have against their plots & snares. (I expect they think they've already got this one in the bag as well.) They've got another think coming! Cheers. :^)

>>38256 Agreed. I'd like to think my creations do that, and that Galatea specifically can help bring in the Robowaifu age. PS: You know the Bible well, I had to look that up.

>>38258 >Agreed. I'd like to think my creations do that, and that Galatea specifically can help bring in the Robowaifu age. Of course! The loving spirit of her creator runs all through dear Galatea, Anon. Same as all the other good (robo)waifus created here & elsewhere. That hopeful spirit is literally the key to unlocking Anons-everywhere's power levels! Don't worry, she's already playing her part as an encouragement to us all! <Slow & steady is your key to success here, GreerTech. >tl;dr Once men realize we don't have to be in bondage to the evil systems devised against us any longer (chasing after women is the first-and-foremost of these debilitating practices... God never intended that sort of evil to exist within the male-female relationships -- they're here to be 'helpmeets' for us) then we can heal, stand up as real men, and together we can work towards something far greater than our individual selves here~ <---> But there's a tough row to hoe there ahead of us, so let's all just tighten our belts and Gambatte!! Cheers, Anon. :^) TWAGMI