>>27405
>So if I want to talk about the comic but I have theories or questions about the males robots, I can't post it here?
As long as you can do so without being abusive against our
>no literal faggots sh*te (>>3)
rule, then sure, their discussion is fine. Images are simply off-limits as a tarbaby no one here in their right mind wants us to engage with (nor will we).
>>27412
>I'm more concerned with these botlers being a foot-in-the-door for Tumblr-tier homo art.
Pretty much this, yeah.
But further as an industry, we just don't want to support the concept itself. We exist to help men get their
waifus... not to create general humanoids. Male bots would support the feminist's and the faggot's agendas; not men's. And we're (explicitly) not here to promote either of those two groups -- but rather quite the opposite: to help & to serve
men. Cheers, Anon. :^)
---
>tl;dr
There's a reason we're called
robowaifu, not robohusbando. Simple as.
>===
-
add'l resp
-
fmt, prose edit
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 12/18/2023 (Mon) 05:36:29.