>>35582
>While I indeed wasn't niggerpilling, in certain circles I have come off as pessimistic regarding robotwaifu scaled production timelines (in my opinion realistic).
A healthy dose of skepticism is, well,
healthy in general.
>That being said, I have the same fantasies of robotwaifus like Mina from My Wife Has No Emotion or Dorothy from Big O. I enjoy them and I wish for a future in which they became a reality.
You are truly human, IMO. Once the
Robowaifu Age dawns the many evils that have been wrought against men will begin to heal.
Onward! :^)
>I take care to measure my enthusiasm though, and don't want to hype myself for a future that is far in the future still.
>I also tend to demand proof that I know won't be on hand to make a point which I know can be a rather caustic form of ribbing.
As an amateur scientist, I not only don't have any problems with this, I applaud it. And as a wannabe-engineer, I constantly seek concrete solutions to realworld problems.
>I'm sure Robophilliac has some has something interesting cooking and I just need to LET HIM COOK.
All of us have our own levels & styles. I simply encourage us to make great accommodations one for the other. Thanks, Anon! :D
>Bipedal locomotion is a big ask unto itself
Yes indeedy. But one day the general consensus will be solved, and we'll all move on to the next big conundrum! :^)
>While my "hugbot" concept was somewhat of a shitpost, that high-speed low-drag design philosophy of "cut away the fat and reduce down to only the most necessary components" I think is important for creating bots that are both affordable and easier to build than more feature rich creations.
It will all come in stages, Anon. After all Carroll Shelby was only 4yrs old when the first
Model A rolled off the assembly line! :DD
>I have the same sentiment towards screen faces.
While I'm generally inclined to agree, they aren't in fact very 'snuggly'. This is an important concept for most people, I think. Hopefully some seriously-good design compromises with come down the pike here that combine the best of both worlds. Why not start on that today, Anon?
:^)
>Hopefully without reducing the structural strength along the way.
This. My little experiments with jumbo drinking straws afforded a remarkable 1400:1 compression/mass ratio! So, just like
birbs (cf.
>>35604, et al), clever design tricks can get us all across 'the finish line' in this area.
Great post Anon, thanks! Cheers. :^)