>>35562
>detachable holes that are easy to clean and replace will be the superior solution
Debatable as the "best" solution for cleaning, but desirable for variety of experience. Have you seen the sheer variety of internal designs available in onaholes?
>I regularly see people talking about "self-cleaning" bots which don't make sense with our current tech.
I regularly see people decrying some idea as being unworkable, without providing any information on their background, experience or their own attempts at solving the problem, or who list a variety of obstacles that have already been solved elsewhere, or in your case both.
>It's either people not understanding how hard it can be to clean a silicone-wrapped body
It's called showering, or bathing. Meat women and men have been doing it together for generations. I look forward to repeating the experience (it was a lot of fun) with my robowaifu. Assuming a faux-skin engineered to behave like human skin (as many lovedolls already are) ordinary soap and water should suffice, with occasional supplements of plasticizers or other compounds. This is of course assuming that you don't have a Cherry 2000 that isn't waterproof.
>or wanting to have an artificial vagina that has to be bathed in chemicals regularly to maintain hygiene.
Meat women do this all the time (or should, if they are sexually active). It's called douche. You can probably walk to a store that sells it.
>humans are messy
See bathing, above.
>hard surfaces are easier to remove in pieces for maintenance
Ziplock seals for flexible containers have been around for ever, and work so well that they used them in the Apollo spacesuits.
>In this way, post-snu-snu activities, the robo-girl sits on the toilet, opens her "alimentary" connecting valve, inserts a hose from the faucet in her mouth and flushes any unwonted residue from her body.
>This is a big ask both mechanically and logically for a robot to handle in the short term. It might be a nice concept in about 2 decades but for the immediate future it's too ambitious I think.
More like less than 2 years, at least that's my schedule, because it's mostly repurposing existing hardware, with only a few new (and some old) ideas.
>needs to be able to navigate your house
Many robots already do this, including robot vacuums
>needs the dexterity to manipulate the necessary valves and hoses to initiate the cleaning process
Robochefs are already performing more complicated tasks. It will probably take more time to get in and out of the teleoperation rig to train the motions for the robot, than the actual training will take. And that's if training is even necessary- we are at the singularity.
And finally my favorite objection:
>needs to be able to maintain their own internal "plumbing" to make sure this closed system doesn't leak and damage other components inside their body
When was the last time you had a problem with the hoses to your washer or dishwasher? They do fail but it's very rare, unless it's 20 years old or you've got mice. It's almost always the electronics that kills an appliance, because switch contacts or components simply wear out. If the idea of a hose going bad in your waifu worries you, you can replace it every 5 years, and moisture sensors are cheap. The design issue I'm working on as part of this system, is a watertight seal between a removable face and the interior of the mouth, but I think Tupperware may have already cracked it. Presumably the doll manufacturers already have a seal system for the removable onaholes.
To be clear, I'm not trying to put you down or be insulting. I hope you will continue to contribute. We also need luddites to try to anticipate problems we may not have already thought of- God knows it would have been great if someone like you had pointed out in the design phase that it would be a good idea if the CO2 scrubber cartridges in the Apollo CM and LM were the same size and shape, just in case. But before you post an objection, try to falsify it yourself. Assume you are wrong and try to figure out why. Or that someone else has already solved it and try to find that solution. If you can't, then it may really be an issue of concern to the community. Otherwise someone has to take the time to point out why these are not really problems, but more importantly, you have held yourself back for some time being concerned over non issues.
Good luck with your project.