>>29589
I think it mostly comes down to two things (in our specific domain's case), Anon:
1. General startup inertia (both literal & figurative) in industries that rely significantly on physical materials/manufacture (as opposed to primarily 'soft' industries).
2. FUD regarding the stranglehold of feminism on the culture. This is created by the GH ofc --
who oh just so happen to run the Central Banks with their fiat money printing presses as well..., so no real surprise.
So, two things are coming down the pipe for robowaifus in particular:
1. This will start up as a grassroots movement, just as embodied in /robowaifu/, et al, and then be taken up by smaller interests -- probably mostly from the Far East.
2. Once the undeniable appeal and clearly yuge market demand becomes apparent even to normals, then the GH will 'suddenly' do a 180 and """inform""" the world that, "Yes,
we've always been at war with Eurasia we'll need humanoid robots b/c muh_economy, and we'll condescend to allowing you vermin to have even personal robots as well -- aren't we nice!? (for only a nominal fee of no less than 35% [and up] of your monthly UBI budget) * plus absolute & complete, invasive surveillance & remote-control (by our agents), given to you for no additional charge! (so don't miss those payments)"
>tl;dr
Just say no to their evil plots. IMO we here on /robowaifu/ -- and other DIY-alikes similar to us -- are
already on the only viable pathway into the future of loving, affordable, open-source, 100% disconnected robowaifus to help out men (males specifically) the world-over.
>>29598
>slumming the various posts
Thanks for gracing us with your favor & presence, friend. Welcome back, BTW! :^)
>===
-
fmt, prose edit
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 02/18/2024 (Sun) 23:55:07.