>Do you happen to have a link with this sort of data laid out or is it just something you know?
Yes, it has been laid out methodically, and no, I don't know where it's at off the top of my head. I was more diligent & rigorous about this type thing a few years ago.
But it's easy enough to see for yourself: simply compare two skeletons having identical race, identical age, and identical environment -- one male, one female. Not hard to see many of the differences; it's pretty clear (and commonsense as well). Most of these differences are directly-related to the divergent primary roles God accommodated us for: men to fight battles, work hard, and reason clearly; women to bear children, and be a comfort & help to those around them.
However this is but one data point and you can't generalize from a sample size of just one
. So, lather, rinse, and repeat this type of examination 3'000 or so more times to get a population of sufficient statistical validity. :^)
As to the physiognomy issue it's a yuge sociological no-no to even admit
the reality of it today because MUH_RAYCISM (well that, and the fact that the Globohomo has a clear agenda underway to genocide the White race). Back in the late 19th, early 20th centuries however, there were several comparative studies done by researchers on this topic, primarily coming out of Europe. Hard to find it all now I imagine because of the GH's strong drive to memory hole this sort of thing -- at least for the public.
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 07/19/2023 (Wed) 18:56:51.