>>331
There is really no decency or honor left. People are really all acting like immature little kids these days.
>>332
>The worst part is Stallman would probably agree with her as she brought up the magic words 'climate change'.
Yeah, I probably disagree with Stallman on almost everything. But they are taking it too far. It's really all just a big enactment to finally remove Stallman that had much control over the free software meta and despite him being quite insane himself always protected it from becoming too SJW influenced.

I will never contribute to their goddamn projects. I'll either do my own shit or just keep working for a company. Everyone needs to think hard if they really want to develop software for free for such an ungrateful community that will stab them in the back. Making a project open source has so many advantages but if you can't trust the people you're working with anymore, then there will be nothing left of it other than a race for gaining the most control in a given project.

>>334
Giving away your code marks you as an exploitable pleb.

>>335
>pic
the cringe is tangible in factory of course. my guess is they are clueless as well.

>>201
Oh, I thought it was an Arch installer that also pulled his dotfiles. I still don't see why you'd want to use someones elses set up, but eh whatever. I just checked out his blogscript and you're right, that shit is dope. I'm going to write something similar except using awk because I'm a nigger for my own site now that I've seen that, thanks!
>spoiler
Well yeah, that's why I don't get why you'd use someone elses configs. Everyone that uses a WM inbstead of a DE has their own autistic preferences. Also
>not remapping caps lock to escape
>actually using caps lock

If you check out his homepage he doesn't seem too concerned about all this and just wrote a quick log on his political notes page, ever since he converted to the global warming death cult he hasn't been the same.

>GPLv4 comes out.
>"It turns out the most important FREEDOM is respecting other people's FREEDOMs."
>"Therefore, GPLv4 includes a CoC."
>FOSS goes woke.
>FOSS goes broke.
>FANGs are the only ones in town.
>People trying to resist this say we should ask the government to break up big tech or regulate them or something.
>"Uh, I guess we can regulate them?"
>More regulatory capture ensues, now big tech's powers are cemented even more.
>"ANTITRUST"
>At best there are now 5 more big tech firms. Nothing changes.
>Big tech increases copyright terms from 200 years to 2391579058 years.
>"Uh no, don't...more regulation maybe?"
>DMCA2 is passed, which gives Disney/FANGs control over all copyrights.
>"THIS IS TERRIBLE, YOU HAVE TO REGULATE BIG TECH."
>The entire internet gets DMCA-claimed.
>"THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD DO SOMETHING, REGULATE THEM MORE"
>You can only post on three available platforms.
>"THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE LISTENED TO MY PROPOSALS FOR REGULATION AND ANTITRU--" this speech is not available in your country.

>>132
>>133
>END OF AN ERA
Definitely. So, no more sitting around and relying on people like Stallman and Torvalds to bring back sanity when SJWs are trying to take over. But most tech people don't want to bother with politics, and so they just comply even when they're generally against it. This way the tech industry will get taken over without even fighting it. Because fighting it seems to be seen as ideologically inconsistent by apolitical types.
People need to go and start their own projects and organisations like Stallman did back in the 70's, based on your own ideals.