>>30890 >Would you please consider creating a #2 thread for us? I could, but it would only matter if I had some special idea about it. I dodn't have something special on my mind. That said, now that you're asking I'm willing to look into the thread and look for something to put into the new OP. Then again, you said the text can be changed later anyways, only the pictures need to stay. I don't have a big idea about the pictures, I would maybe just reuse the old one. If someone else does it instead, just don't use a pic that needs to be spoilered as first pic and don't use some edgy picture from WK-II.

>>30898 Just whatever you're comfortable with, NoidoDev. I'll be happy to do it myself, but frankly you're our best 'cartographer' here for /robowaifu/. You've mapped the place out better than any of us... well, better'n me anyway! :D Some other anon can step up if they'd like to as well, ofc. If someone else does, just please make a solid effort for the OP of a thread that will be seen for years in the catalog! :^) >I would maybe just reuse the old one. That would be fine if you'd like to. OTOH, I personally think the 'Chii wants you...' image in the old propaganda style that Anon came up with would be a good choice too?

Really encouraging to see Robi making some improvement plans for Alogs! >>>/meta/1

>>30901 Sorry for not answering faster, I have some things distracting me. >but frankly you're our best 'cartographer' here for /robowaifu/. You've mapped the place out better than any of us.. Thanks, but again that's the text, so it can be changed later, right? >I would maybe just reuse the old one. That would be fine if you'd like to. OTOH, I personally think the 'Chii wants you...' image in the old propaganda style that Anon came up with would be a good choice too? Yes. This one? >>2796

>>30932 >so it can be changed later, right? Yes. >This one? Yeah, whatever's the latest revision. IIRC, there were some issues being fixed till then.

I keep having fantasies of my robot wife while we listen to edm. Anyone have an idea how we can make a robot enjoy music? My current idea is a stream of consciousness (one frame every 0.1 sec) that gets put through a liquid time constant rnn or equivalent trained on emotion and music. There's some github repos I can get started using if no one else has a better idea.

>>30992 How do you "train"on emotion? Do you mean you pick a specific genre, say EDM, then assign a positive weight to it, and assign negative values to other genres? Like in RL? So, you're gf will say positive things when hearing EDM ?

>>30993 Assign a value to of -10 to +10. Let sensory information dictate that value. >positive weight to it, and assign negative values to other genres? If you force someone to like something, do they really like it? Emotions are influenced by hormones for humans which, when represented in pure data, would be numeric noise for a robot. Ask yourself, "Who are you with when you're listening to the music, what did you eat before you listened to the music, what kind of place are you listening to the music in?". There's lots of background information that your brain processes on top of the hormones it releases to color the world with emotion. All those factors contribute to the overall enjoyment of music and how you feel about it when you hear it. I got my dick sucked while listening to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL1BDku3GLM, I'd heard the song before but it hit a little different to me after that experience and whenever I hear it now, an emotion (along with a memory tied to that emotion) resonates with me. I don't think a robot can enjoy music the same way a human can, not without a very sophisticated brain than what we currently have available. At best, it could mimic a human's emotions if they saw the human was enjoying music. If you just want the robot to say "I enjoy electronic funk", that's easy enough to write into its definitions/personality.

>>30992 >>30993 >>30998 May I introduce you Anons to Snowball, the dancing cockatoo? I'm sure his little birb-brain is quite smol compared to a human's, yet as a Nephesh creature (like all birbs), he is capable of emotions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7IZmRnAo6s >=== -minor edit

Discord(s) have been mentioned here a few times. But why is there no mention of matrix? Is there a specific reason? There seems to be people here who will not use discord on principle. (my self included) But the idea of a chat is nice and could boost collaboration if more people are involved.

>>31086 Good points, EnvelopingTwilight. I'm sure Matrix and other solutions have been suggested here before. Personally, I feel there are strong reasons not to use anything other than an anonymous, open, public-facing forum platform. Right now, that only means using an IB, AFAICT. I've given my reasons for such a position here before: >-Why we exist on an imageboard, and not some other forum platform (>>15638, >>17937) : (cf. >>26137) Of course, Anons are quite welcome to do whatever they please. But it's also quite obvious that we here have already lost a lot of information into the netherlands of Doxxcord by our anons there -- even at this relatively-early stage of things. :/ >=== -minor edit

>>31086 Not that I'm against socialiizing, but your point >the idea of a chat is nice and could boost collaboration if more people are involved. Are you sure about that? I wish /robowaifu/ was a little more lively but if it was it'd be a sign people are too busy posting here and not focusing on R&D for robot waifus. If a 3-D printing person wants to work with a mechanical person they can drop an email or something where the two can directly work with one another. As much as I'd love to don a labcoat and bump elbows with actual scientists, engineers, coders, and so on in some laboratory, I'd hardly be able to keep up with any of them on a technical level. If people are really invested in pushing things to the limit I would assume they're already working at Boston dynamics or something like that. No need to post garage pics on an obscure image board. >Matrix That is better site to more technical people but is there any need for it outside a desire for socilization? If 6 or 7 guys from this board wanted to work together and rent out a warehouse for R&D, Matrix would be a nice platform for them to utilize quick messaging but that wouldn't be the reason for their collaboration, just a tool they used in relation to it.

>>31086 >>31138 FWIW as a quasi-lurker for some time: I understand the potential benefit of 'diversifying' communication methods -- rather than having all of the robowaifu eggs in one basket, so to speak. But on the other hand, in a community that is already quite sparse, I'd be wary of diluting the discussion further. Especially if things start branching into platforms that are essentially no-go zones for a sizeable portion of the intended audience (which Discord seems to be, for many here). I personally am grateful that this place is an IB. It's a comfortable and familiar format for myself and I'm sure most others who find their way here. If this place were predominantly on Discord instead, I would never have found it. And although I am personally a longtime fan of IRC for example, I can see that moving to platforms and protocols other than a simple universal web forum will cause potential contributors to drop out. At this (to be honest) very early stage, I feel that would be counterproductive. All this to say that I really just like having this huge library of knowledge readily accessible, *plus* semi-live discussion capability built into that same universal format. I hope that at the very least, this place remains a 'hub' of sorts to tie things together. I see /robowaifu/'s accumulated body of knowledge as very valuable.

I can't relate to anyone needing a chatbot companion. The only utility I'd have for a current-tech waifubot is a concubine, and I'd be too ashamed to actually go out and purchase one in the first place, let alone admit to designing and building one. HOWEVER, it does present an interesting engineering challenge: It doesn't have to walk by itself or be intelligent, but it has to withstand the weight of a human body on top of it, be animated, inexpensive and easily customizable for individual tastes. Methinks the best option is to make a skinny endoskeleton/armature that you can easily boolean into a sculpted model and 3d print. The outer shell can be whatever shape, but it will be supported by strong triangular infill and inner channel/endoskeleton. You couldn't shove super strong motors into there, so I think it would need some kind of central "string drive" located in the torso or distributed throughout the armature. It doesn't need to be especially articulate or strong, just able to do gross motor movements and sense resistance. I'm probably not going to make it a reality, but I thought I'd share.

always keep this in mind -no matter how impossible the task seems -no matter how hopeless and powerless you feel -there is always something you can do as long as you have a computer

>>30124 >Unreal Are you still on it? I would love to help a fellow Anon with Unreal Engine. I totally understand that it's pretty difficult to work with skeletal meshes and animations in Unreal. There are a few approaches, a big problem of the epic skeleton is, that you cannot import it in blender correctly. Maybe there are some new options with UE5.4? I saw there are some rigging tools. This way you could import your model as static mesh, add the skeleton and weight paint it in Unreal. This way you could have at least your model with the skeleton ready to use. Maybe the animations would look a little odd before retargeting, but at least functional. I worked a lot with UE4 and use mainly 5.2 because of laziness. So I'm a little out of the loop with the new tooling provided by Epic. To be honest I might put my attempt to make a simulation in Unreal on hold. I saw a nice Example of Unity with ML-Agents and will probably play around with this for the next time. It seemed a lot more 'complete' and it feels like I have to do so much groundwork to get my shit together in Unreal. With Unity ML-Agents it looks a little bit more like plug and play. I will tell you guys if it works nicer or if it is another instance of 'the grass is greener'.

Recently I've been following a project called The Orifice. While I like it in spirit, the product itself leaves a lot to be desired, since it's basically just a fleshlight that's clear, with a ring of LEDs, a speaker, a microphone, 2 cameras to measure penetration depth, and a microcontroller with an LLM. And that's pretty much all $700 gets you. My biggest beef is that although he said there'll be an API, it's not opensource and he's given basically no other details about it hardware/performance-wise. But the real deal-breaker is that it's dependent on an internet connection. I asked about having it completely air-gapped and all he said was the imbedded board wasn't good enough for that, and something about running it on his 3090ti when I said I wanted to run my own home server for mine, obviously trying to discourage me. The hardware doesn't impress me and the software I know nothing about. I really just want something offline I can chat with already, and don't really care about the fleshlight.

>>31237 If you just wanna chatbot look into GPT4all. I got a 7b model running on a RTX 2070. "pip install gpt4all", installs everything and the script will install the specified model automagically, too. https://gpt4all.io/index.html

>>31138 >>31151 >>31158 Makes perfect sense, I am not really pushing for it too, I was just wondering and also making sure it was not due to lack of awareness. I especially agree with the problem of chats turning into information black-holes. If people want to socialize I imagine there is no problem with using an off-topic thread for that. >>31237 I think that is pure bullshit, How many tokens per second do you need, with a 7-8b 4bit quant you could fit it on a SBC/mini pc. I have purchased a tiny n100 based PC from amazon for like $160. Its size is 2.83 * 2.83 * 1.77 inches (search M6S Mini PC), So far I think its perfect for using in projects. (also its not arm, so big bonus) Even if onboard compute it not practical, there is no good excuse for not allowing your own server. I think the advice of >>31239 is good GPT4all is a good place to look, I also like llama.cpp While I am here, I would like to share some stuff I found that I think could be of use to others. https://youtu.be/TQiLLcumqDw | Rolling joints that emulate how natural joints work. https://vgel.me/posts/representation-engineering/ | Control vectors look really powerful for controlling LLMs. I am thinking about how to apply control vectors to LLMs in a context of a greater cognitivie architecture.

>>31237 Its basically a fleshlight but I support it He follows me on twitter and joined our project server (WaifuLabs for lack of a better name rn) His goals are the same but he's more focused on disrupting the simp market by providing a sexual outlet. It's not and was never intended to be a robowaifu of any sort

>>31158 We've had a few meetings in VRchat. That's the closest I've been able to come up with to a VR meeting space. Considered other apps but everyone already has or is familiar with VRC. This actually has helped greatly b/c you're speaking in real-time, can gesture, sketch drawings, even play videos from YouTube. VC meetings (discord) were productive as well. There are things you just can't do on an imageboard if you want to collaborate

>>31237 >not open source >not run locally Massive red flags right there.

>>31239 I know LLMs can be run on something as small as a Raspberry Pi (https://youtu.be/Y2ldwg8xsgE) but even without the insufferable guardrails of ChatGPT or Bing's copilot turning every reply it gives me into shit, or me stupidly trying to figure out how to use text to speech and voice to text so I don't have to spend any more time typing and staring at a screen, I still haven't used one that makes for a remotely good chatbot. Sure, I'd like for it to read through gigabytes of documents and tell me what's in them, help me write code, or even give me reminders so I don't have to check my phone, but aside from character.ai, (which is still bad because of guardrails) I haven't yet seen one that actually functions like a half-way decent chatbot. >>31241 >Even if onboard compute it not practical, there is no good excuse for not allowing your own server. He hasn't said one way or another if you could host your own server, he's just given no information about doing so, which raises red flags. >>31248 >His goals are the same but he's more focused on disrupting the simp market by providing a sexual outlet. >It's not and was never intended to be a robowaifu of any sort What exactly makes it *not* a robowaifu? I'm reminded of the Minimum Viable Waifu thread >>13648 and aside from lacking a display with an avatar on it, it seems to meet the most minimum requirements without a full body and motorized onahole. >>31251 Yeah, that's the main reason I won't be getting one.

So, I was gone for a bit, had some issues. >>31010 >the dancing cockatoo This was actually quite epic. >>31086 Discord works for additional chit chat, it maybe adds some social bonding and creativity. That said, these platforms are somewhat graveyards for data or information black holes, the board on the other hand can be backed up by anyone using bump. >>31138 >quite obvious that we here have already lost a lot of information into the netherlands of Doxxcord by our anons there Maybe a little bit, but not relevant to other data on the web. It's mostly just more social stuff, like memes and chit chat. >>31254 >I haven't yet seen one that actually functions like a half-way decent chatbot. Did you try Silly Tavern role play and such?

>>31258 >Did you try Silly Tavern role play and such? I never heard of it before. Is it any good?

Am I still banned or what. Will get to talk to the robot head soon I hope but it's being delayed because of my computer acting up. I'm getting around it by using the cloud. It's not what I had in mind but here we are.

So I had a discord but it got reported by a 16 year old brat that submitted a tip to the FBI for no reason and poof just like that all my stuff is erased.

I don't really know much about working with high voltages, but for a while now I've been fascinated by this old patent for a voltage multiplier (https://patents.google.com/patent/US4095162A/en) that works in an unconventional way, and I'd like to know how efficient it is compared to other kinds. It takes a fluorescent bulb and switches between connecting and disconnecting both ends at the same time. A metal tube/plate is placed against the glass of the bulb and given a charge, acting as the plate of a capacitor, with the glass of the bulb as the dielectric and the plasma inside the bulb is conductive, which makes it the other capacitor plate. Normally if you take charged capacitor plates and yank them apart or push them together the change in capacitance over time creates a change in voltage. The faster the plates move, the greater the change in voltage. The ionizing and deionizing of the gas in the bulb happens faster than anyone could ever physically move a plate, creating bursts of high voltage whenever the switch is thrown. This sounds perfect for something I want for my waifu, but I don't know how efficient it would actually be, and don't really know how to even test that.

>>31321 its just an old vacuum tube capacitor, vacuum tubes are obsolete now for some reason i dont know about maybe the gas makes them explode at high temps or something, for high voltage pulses they use film capacitors now

>>31321 That looks super interesting. I wouldn't discount vacuum tubes. If you want serious kick ass power...vacuum tubes. Radio, TV stations, large power=tubes. I'm not 100% sure how this works. A guess. You can get intense current in plasmas. Guessing, intense current makes high magnetic field which when stopped dumps all the field strength. Since it can't flow in the gas ALL of it flows from the outside electrode conductor. So the interior plasma makes a field that activates the outside electrode. The outside electrode could be a s simple as wrapping with aluminium foil. I don't know how you would trigger the plasma inside the tube. Normal, old school florescent tubes have a coil of wire just like a light bulb that is energized. It gives off electrons just like a incandescent light bulb This energizes, starts, the plasma. When the plasma energizes current flows, but there's a big ass transformer coil on the inputs to lower the current. Without the big coil it would burn the whole thing to a crisp and melt down the electrodes. There are some newer bulbs with only one contact on each end called fast start, I think. I think they use a real high starting pulse voltage but I don't remember how the circuit works or cuts off the high voltage pulse. If you got that type and then just shut it on and off real fast, might do the trick. Maybe... If I understand this correctly it could have some real advantages for high voltage. It "appears" to me to be a mirror of inductive high voltage creation but with capacitance. The advantage, as I see it, would be an inductor, big coil of wire, might have high voltage but the current it could produce would be held back by the resistance in the wiring. This, since it has a big plate and little resistance could get you a high voltage WITH high current. So you get a very fast high voltage, high current pulse, equals, HIGH POWER. (If I understand correctly, I could be wrong). Here's a odd site that talks about high fields in capacitors. Look down the page until you see "The similarities" https://www.novakcorp.com/energy/experiments/homopolar.htm "...It has been demonstrated that when such a circular capacitor is being charged, a rotating magnetic field is present between the two plates and its flow direction is determined by the electric current's own direction . The magnetic field vanishes when the charging is complete or in other word when the electron flow extinguishes. Since in a capacitor, it is the dielectric which stores all of the charges, I visualize that the magnetic flux strength is in direct relation with the amount of electrons flowing into the dielectric..." It is an odd site about odd stuff but it's not wrong about magnetic fields in capacitors.

>>31325 >https:// seriously thats the most long winded obfuscated description of amperes law and its not even mentioned like this is just charlatanry of basic electromagnetism

>>31323 That is not at all how it works. I could not have explained it any more accurately. It's like an electrostatic generator, but instead of mechanically moving the capacitor plates one of the plates changes from being a conductive plasma to non-conductive, making it dramatically faster. >>31325 >I don't know how you would trigger the plasma inside the tube. Normal, old school florescent tubes That was probably just a poor choice of words, I'm pretty sure it's just an arc lamp or flashtube. Before he died in 2014 and before RexResarch went down, he replied to some emails asking about it and he just called it "a UV bulb". With that it's just a DPDT switch to connect and disconnect both ends of it at the same time. Maybe an IGBT or MOSFET could be used instead, I'm not sure. >Here's a odd site that talks about high fields in capacitors. Look down the page until you see "The similarities" >https://www.novakcorp.com/energy/experiments/homopolar.htm I was not expecting someone to bring up the Biefield-Brown effect so soon, because the two are closely related. But for now I only want to focus on finding an easier way to produce the same voltage multiplying effect for the high voltage with high current, preferably without using a bulb that could burn out.

>>31334 are you even talking about the same thing, theres no moving parts and how can it have anything to do with electroSTATIC charges if its part of a circuit with a current and if all it does is make charging faster then all it does is amplify the voltage which means its literally just a capacitor, your talking about like a wimshurst machine

>>31321 To the original poster asking for help. The newer florescent tubes, I'm talking the long ones(they make short small ones too), have only two electrodes, one on each end. The former I talked about have two on each end, old style. I'm fairly sure the new style pulses a large voltage across the tube for a small amount of time to get the current going in the tube. Which becomes a plasma. You might could get the circuits from the new style and vary them to make large pulses but instead of keeping the tube powered would deliver a large pulse then cut off. It would seem to be easier to start with something already made. Actually making this sort of thing from scratch would be a huge pain in the ass. "...before RexResarch went down, he replied to some emails asking about it and he just called it "a UV bulb"..." Florescent tubes ARE "UV" bulbs. They put out UV internally, which excites phosphors, creating viable light. Possibly one of the perils of using these is could the phosphors provide a return path for the voltage/field (internally), so that it's not all dumped to the outer electrode. Possibly you could use UV bulbs used in tanning beds. They might work better. >>31327 >obfuscated description of amperes law What a silly neurotic person you are. You can do better? Maybe you think I should give him the formal definition. From Wikipedia, "Ampère's law" Explanation The integral form of the original circuital law is a line integral of the magnetic field around some closed curve C (arbitrary but must be closed). The curve C in turn bounds both a surface S which the electric current passes through (again arbitrary but not closed—since no three-dimensional volume is enclosed by S), and encloses the current. The mathematical statement of the law is a relation between the circulation of the magnetic field around some path (line integral) due to the current which passes through that enclosed path (surface integral).[10][11] In terms of total current, (which is the sum of both free current and bound current) the line integral of the magnetic B-field (in teslas, T) around closed curve C is proportional to the total current Ienc passing through a surface S (enclosed by C). In terms of free current, the line integral of the magnetic H-field (in amperes per metre, A·m−1) around closed curve C equals the free current If,enc through a surface S. Who can understand that? He said he was trying to make one of these and I talked about how tubes, florescents use plasmas to make light, how they use coils to limit current to not burn the electrodes up, how they start them and how he might go about using already made industrial materials to make what he wanted. What do you do...nothing, not a thing, you added nothing but your little childish whiny criticism. What you wrote was of no use at all. All it showed was you are an abrasive pitiful neurotic self absorbed person who has nothing better to do than criticize others and is of no use yourself. You add nothing of value. Likely because you have no value. Baby mad because he not consulted. Baby mad but child not good enough to provide any help? Cry, cry, criticize those that do when you can't.

>> >I was not expecting someone to bring up the Biefield-Brown effect so soon, because the two are closely related. But for now I only want to focus on finding an easier way to produce the same voltage multiplying effect for the high voltage with high current, preferably without using a bulb that could burn out. What I linked...Probably not the best but I saved it under capacitors and it was easy to find. Some ideas. Marx generators. Charge up a bunch of capacitors in parallel then dump them in series. Gives you a big ass pulse of power. The switch would be the tubes gas breaking down to plasma. An odd one, EMP generators. They use explosives to compress a energized coils. Very interesting, but not likely of use to you...but maybe so. Maybe get a thick glass or ceramic tube, put copper plates on the ends, evacuate it, then dump a marx generator into it, with a conductive shell around it. Lots of sparks, possibly death! If you do it live steam it to storage so we can see what happens! I looked at the paper, 100 million volts, WOW! BTW I love rex research.

>>31336 >wimshurst machine What he is taking about is totally different. Completely. If I understand correctly he is creating a huge magnetic field internal to a tube then since the current is completely shut off the field is dumped into external electrodes making high voltages. I have no idea if this works. Patents don't have to necessarily work to be issued.

>>31344 was talking about the drivel on that site written by a quack taking something you learn in highschool, obfuscating it making it sound more complicated than it is and mixing it with pseudoscience like aether and ufo propulsion, and yeah amperes law is trivial its literally just saying electro-magnetic, you pass a current through a wire you create a magnetic field, you pass a wire through a magnetic field you create a current, it even comes with its own thumbs up >>31346 i was answering the question > I've been fascinated by this old patent for a voltage multiplier ... I'd like to know how efficient it is compared to other kind ... [ just words ] honestly i have no clue what either of you are pretending to talk about <this is the stupid voltage multiplier just a series of capacitors, except its shitty vacuum tube capacitor and theres nothing special about them you can just replace them with modern capacitors and just make a normal better voltage multiplier and yeah this Patented Invention(tm) doesnt do anything this is like connecting a metal ball to a car battery and thinking if you disconnect the +ve terminal then now the ball will build up a -ve charge because its still connected to the -ve of the battery but not the +ve, world class ingenuity there no idea what your saying, do you think magnetic fields store energy or something its just a flow, doesnt matter really cuz theres literally no magnetic field created other than the insignificant one of the wires (alla amperes law) just like literally all circuits, the Patented Invention(tm) clearly doesnt even care about a magnetic field otherwise you would see coils or a solenoid or something, theres nothing

>>31346 You just described a simple boost converter. They work by switching inductors to use collapsing magnetic fields to generate higher voltages at lower currents relative to their input. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boost_converter

>>31344 Please, be civil. Your link does appear to overcomplicate simple concepts with magical thinking. Aether isn't real. Whereas I temd to let these things go without comment as esoteric concepts can have merit, do not belittle others for providing simple explanations.

>>31348 >honestly i have no clue what either of you are pretending to talk about Then why don't you just stay out of it? I do agree you do not know what we are talking about. I DO know what he is talking about or I think I do. It's different from a normal capacitor or an inductor. And note I did say ignore all the paper except the part I specified. If you read more, then that's because you don't pay attention and assume things that I did not say. >no idea what your saying, do you think magnetic fields store energy or something You have no idea what you are talking about or what we are talking about and I'm not going to waste time teaching because you don't understand, nor are you willing to. You're just trolling for fun. This is, fine, but the more you talk, the more we see your lack of understanding. >>31358 Yes, sort of like that but different with, if it works as he says, unique properties and very high voltages. It doesn't have inductors and doesn't work like the circuit you linked.

>>31359 >Please, be civil Anon is trolling me. Can you not see this? Why is he telling me about " old vacuum tube capacitor" and "long winded obfuscated description of amperes law"??? It's not uncivil to treat uncivil people, uncivilly. They ask for it. >do not belittle others for providing simple explanations. He provided no explanation at all. None. He just belittled things that he has no idea about. He believes, or so he said, that magnetic fields are only in coils "... the Patented Invention(tm) clearly doesnt even care about a magnetic field otherwise you would see coils..." Sigh... I you notice I'm always polite and try to be helpful until someone attacks me, then I give them the same And as for the paper I explicitly said that it was odd and that one section was relevant. Here's what I said exactly, "...Here's a odd site that talks about high fields in capacitors. Look down the page until you see "The similarities" ...It is an odd site about odd stuff but it's not wrong about magnetic fields in capacitors..." I couldn't be any clearer that I was talking about one thing. Twice I said it was an odd site. Oh and BTW, "...Aether isn't real..." The experiment that all the text books say proved that aether is not real, Michelson–Morley experiment, did NOT show what the textbooks say. There was NOT the same speed of light going in the same direction as earths travel as perpendicular to it. I've read the original printed experiment myself personally. The test was done hundreds and hundreds of times, in many different sorts of experiments. They even used different coverings of different sorts and none of them show equal speeds. There was always some offset. NOT 25Km/s or whatever earth speed is but, if I remember correctly, it was something like 8Km/s, difference. The textbooks are wrong. The reason this is so, likely, is because Einstein's work would have had problems so they refused to admit there was a difference. So there is no experiment, like they say, that disproves aether. Wikipedia lies about this very subtly. They say the test was repeated many times, BUT they do not say all of these found a speed difference(hundreds of test I'm talking about). After listing all these test, they THEN say the last test showed nothing. BUT they forget to mention it was done in a mine shaft which as you could imagine would cause problems with aether. I found out about this from G. Harry Stine. It's amazing how much bullshit we are fed. It annoys me to no end hence this guy trolling me with bullshit annoys me.

>>31361 Yes, they were being rude. This is too much for a response. "What do you do...nothing, not a thing, you added nothing but your little childish whiny criticism. What you wrote was of no use at all. All it showed was you are an abrasive pitiful neurotic self absorbed person who has nothing better to do than criticize others and is of no use yourself. You add nothing of value. Likely because you have no value. Baby mad because he not consulted. Baby mad but child not good enough to provide any help? Cry, cry, criticize those that do when you can't." If they're being rude, feel free to be rude in turn, but don't write a paragraph about it. Elucidate them while being snarky if you must, just try to keep every paragraph relevant to discussion.

Hey /robowaifu/ team been working on some of my writing in the meanwhile I'll share in the OC thread, eventually it will be on my substack. Agree with Kiwi, lets keep it civil (I know we can be a bunch of hotheads in here sometimes and that disagreements will happen, I'm not excluded from that) Meta is for .. meta stuff if we need to get granular it is a good idea move it to another thread or make your own. As for my current projects, I've been tied up between my full time wagie and the removations I do here in exchange for rent (SD isn't cheap!) but I'm hoping to block out some time and I've made some interesting contacts IRL who have shown me a thing or two including how to use the GitHub copilot so I won't have to relearn 3 semesters of college in one week, things look promising from the AI/chat/emote systems side. Someday hoping to get back on my feet enough to have a workshop and apply these theories in practice. Stay strong, /robowaifu/ as a worldview is beginning to really ignite, more will join up and together we will be unstoppable from achieving the dream

>>31364 >This is too much for a response. Fair enough. I was hoping he would leave it, if I was rude enough to him but...apparently not.

my substack is up and with two new submissions https://metaronin.substack.com

@All -My apologies for letting the /meta thread languish. I've been off in the mountains on a bit of a spirit quest with the Lord and others. Will rectify soon. :^) >>31382 Neat! Thanks Meta Ronin. I tried leaving you a nice comment, but your platform wouldn't accept one from me w/o an (((account))).

>>31558 Glad to hear it!! This is definitely the time of year for that. I'm still trapped in suburbia for now but the ocean is nearby at least. Appreciate the time, just glad to hear you of all people read it, there will be more so wouldn't hurt to make an account or subscribe but I understand if you'd rather not give them your email or info. Fair enough!

>>31558 >Will rectify soon. :^) Lol, I can't post images on teh IB i'm the BO of. :D ROBI PLS TURN BACK ON TORFAG POSTING Till then, would some other Anon mind making the new /meta 10 thread please? >>31560 Nice work you've got talent Meta Ronin. I hope you may 'boot to our fiction bread?

/robowaifu/, what do you think of the most recent british election? What do you think the 2024 American election will be like?

photo reuploads from the dataloss incident