>>18171 >I also want to focus on smaller models everyone can run so I won't be sharding giant models across GPUs except maybe for fun. You could use it to make smaller models from bigger ones? Anyways, my argument was mainly that the price and energy consumption might be the same. I also didn't know you could run Stable Diffusion on one 3060 or that you could join cards without this NVLink. I don't know that much about this stuff.

>>18185 expiring in one day at which time I will delete this post https://discord.gg/UyZqQ32C >>18188 sorry about that! I just thought we had lost anon and I've been trying to track him down for months >>18170 Understood. We all have different expectations but I am going all or nothing to create or at least lay down the foundations and brainstorming for a Real Life Dorothy/2B tier waifu (minus the combat theatrics obviously) Nothing about this is physically impossible. Power considerations perhaps but I have unique solutions for that, (see my 4 hurdles of the robowaifu for more on that, when I remember where I posted that!) FYI and more related to >>29 Robowaifu fiction I have a new Substack post today new substack https://metaronin.substack.com/p/i-need-to-show-you-something I'm still getting the hang of the writing thing so please give a like if it's not horrible (and your feedback if it is) thank you

>>18162 >Also I've been making a shitload of money speeding up my commissions with Stable Diffusion Gratz! >make hay while the sun shines. True in every productive endeavor of life!

>>18193 >I just thought we had lost anon and I've been trying to track him down for months Completely understood Meta Ronin, nprb. Nothing hard-and-fast I learned that lesson long ago now lol, just a gentle nudge in the right direction to help us all out. If you have to talk in w/e thread with someone, then by all means have at it! :^) Cheers.

>>18193 >(see my 4 hurdles of the robowaifu for more on that, when I remember where I posted that!) Waifusearch is a thing you should know this by now heh :^) waifusearch> 4 hurdles ORDERED: ======== THREAD SUBJECT POST LINK /robowaifu/meta-6: Christmastime >>18193 4 hurdles UN-ORDERED: =========== THREAD SUBJECT POST LINK /robowaifu/meta-4: Rugged Mounta >>15182 (4, hurdles) ' 4 hurdles ' [1 : 1] = 2 results --- >ps We just pushed a new version of /robowaifu/ JSON archives; current as of today (see OP ITT). >=== -add 'archives' notice

>>18203 >Waifusearch is a thing you should know this by now heh :^) caught me slacking >>18185 7 day link for you friend (I realized maybe 24 hours might not be enough) discord.gg/2qU4Zjy5 In other interesting news I was briefly on BTR (BreakTheRules) podcast yesterday got to shill robowaifuism a bit It went well I'll be doing more shows with them in the future.

I lurk this board as I have intentions of getting started in robotics and AI/ML. Unfortunately, I still haven't started because I don't know where to start. I checked out the different general threads here on AI, and there's a ton of information and resources. Unfortunately, this makes my problem worse as I just don't know where to start and feel overwhelmed.

>>18285 What are you interested in doing most? I recommend focusing on one topic that really excites you and approaching other areas of ML through your understanding of that. Do you have any programming skills?

>>18285 Hello Anon, welcome (and welcome to the club heh :^) . I'd suggest you simply look over the Elephant thread (>>4143) and go from there. You're simply discovering a phenomenon that's common to everyone here. BTW, this Anon has good advice IMO >>18286 .

>>18285 Is your goal building a robowaifu, of learning about these topics in general? There are plenty of introductions into AI/ML all over the internet, the important point is to get started with any of it. The main other way is to buy a cheap 3D printer, unless if you have a maker space close to you, then you can get into OpenSCAD or Blender. The third way might be to pick up some electronics projects around Arduino, which might be useful in other ways, but get you closer to build a robowaifu one day.

>>18247 >It went well I'll be doing more shows with them in the future. Sweet. Gambatte, Meta Ronin! :^)

>>18286 >>18291 >>18295 I wanna specialize in AI/ML. For now, it seems there's not any implementation of true artificial intelligence in robots beyond vision. I wanna work on the robots brains when eventually in the future, AI is actually used in the robots.

>>18300 There are different opinions on how to approach this exactly, but being familiar with some of the available models and how to run them is going to be useful in every case. Like, e.g. Whisper for speech recognition.

>>18300 >I wanna work on the robots brains when eventually in the future, AI is actually used in the robots. Since you're here on /robowaifu/, I'll presume you're implying humanoid (specifically, gynoid) robots. That being the case, then the 'robot brains' will need to closely emulate the human brain to be satisfactory to men everywhere. That implies that a solid understanding of human brains/behaviors is certainly a necessary pre-req for success with your goals Anon. I certainly recommend caution against entertaining liberal/humanist philosophies on the topic and rather instead stick strictly with the scientifically-observable phenomenon involved. This should give you a solid foundation for working on robowaifu minds, Anon. Good luck!

>>18300 The first thing you'll need is Python and PyTorch. https://www.python.org/downloads/ https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/ I recommend using pip since Conda is bloated and a bit complicated. Conda is only necessary if you're using projects with legacy code. If you have an Nvidia GPU select CUDA with the appropriate version or lowest one if you don't know. If AMD, select ROCm. Then install the Huggingface transformers library and learn how to use it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEaBAZQCtwE This video will show you how to quickly use language models to do different stuff like sentiment analysis, text classification and text generation. Don't worry too much about understanding how they work at first. Playing around with them will naturally make you curious what more you can do with it. Alongside having fun, work on deepening your understanding a bit every day. These free lectures are a gold mine. >Python Full Course for Beginners: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uQrJ0TkZlc >Intro to machine learning: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdAoL1zKcqTW-uzoSVBNEecKHsnug_M0k >Intro to deep learning: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqYmG7hTraZCkftCvihsG2eCTH2OyGScc >Intro to artificial intelligence (mostly symbolic): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP63gFHB6xb-kVBiQHYe_4hSi >The Long-term of AI & Temporal-Difference Learning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeMCEQa85tw >Intro to reinforcement learning: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqYmG7hTraZBKeNJ-JE_eyJHZ7XgBoAyb Also find good textbooks on linear algebra and discrete mathematics and work through them, plus calculus and statistics. You'll need them. I recommend: >Introduction to Applied Linear Algebra: Vectors, Matrices, and Least Squares by Stephen Boyd >Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications by Kenneth H. Rosen >Calculus: Early Transcendentals by James Stewart >Bayesian Statistics the Fun Way: Understanding Statistics and Probability with Star Wars, Lego, and Rubber Ducks by Will Kurt >Probability Theory: The Logic of Science by E.T. Jaynes There's a lot of material here so pace yourself. You're not going to learn it all in a few months or even a year. Get into the habit of reading research early on and following the latest developments. Tutorials and what you can find people talking about on the internet is generally about 2-3 years behind, even for really popular topics like image generation is 6-12 months behind. If I were a beginner getting started today wanting to work on the brains of robots tomorrow, I would start with research involving prompting language models and work my way into understanding how these models work, finding their limitations and figuring how to improve them. >Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 >Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11916 >Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05608 >Interactive Language: Talking to Robots in Real Time https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.06407 >Large Language Models can Self-Improve https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11610 >Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155 (maybe a little too advanced for a beginner but this is the magic behind ChatGPT) Don't forget to hold onto your papers. Bookmark and organize them because you'll have at least a 1000 saved one day and thank yourself if you took the time to make them easy to find. To find new interesting ones go to Google Scholar, look up your favorites and click 'cited by' to find new ones or go look at what new papers the authors have published. And of course read any interesting ones you find cited. Aim to read about 1-3 per day. Learn to use Anki or another flash card program. You're going to be compressing a ton of information into your head and it will accelerate your learning immensely. >Anki walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmPx333n5UQ >Download: https://apps.ankiweb.net/ And lastly, if you get lost on how to do something I recommend using the Hello search engine: https://beta.sayhello.so/ You can ask it questions in natural language and it will generate answers based off web results. It's not always right but it saves a lot of time from getting lost in unhelpful or difficult to understand Google results. If you do these things you'll figure out the rest. I started from nothing a few years ago, not even understanding how to do a dot product and now I'm comfy being able to understand and implement about 90% of the research I read.

>>18306 This is gold, Anon.

Hope you got the chance to enjoy the /christmas/ party this year, /robowaifu/. BTW, there are still a few more events over the next week or so before the actual Christmas holiday. More information is here: https://anon.cafe/christmas/res/188.html Cheers

>>18306 >>18302 >>18301 Thnaks, anons. I'll do what you said.

>>18306 btw do I only need to learn Python? I heard AI models are increasingly written in C++ these days.

>>18316 Model development mostly happens entirely in Python. It's becoming more common though for people to port their models to C++ and custom CUDA kernels. This is only really beneficial when you're writing custom CUDA since PyTorch has a feature called TorchScript that can export Python models and run them in C++ free of any Python dependency. If you're interested in doing more than just the brains and actually integrating AI into robots, I recommend learning C++. If not, then it's not necessary but would be beneficial to understanding algorithms better.

>>18317 Thanks. I do wanna integrate robots with AI. Maybe I'll start with C++ after I'm done with Python. but how will I know if I'm "done" with learning Python? I already have some experience making some programs and scripts in Python, but not Tensorflow. When will I know I'm good enough to move on?

>>18332 Don't just learn stuff you don't need. Try to learn the basics, the things you need and general concepts used in programming. Know where to look up stuff and vaguely how it is called. We have ChatGPT and such now anyways.

>>18332 >When will I know I'm good enough to move on? Once you figure that out, I'll be able to help you with C++ itself.

>>18332 There will always be more to learn but what matters is if you feel comfortable being able to successfully implement and realize any project ideas you have. When you can express your ideas in Python then you're fluent in it.

Chobitsu, can you add this to the board's CSS to fix the vertical posts? .innerPost { min-width: 500px }

>>18347 Done. Please let me know if that fixes if for you, Anon.

>>18348 Thanks, looks good!

>>18349 Glad to help, and thank you BTW. :^) >also I'm thinking of base64 embedding our Chii mascot directly into the file. Do you have any thoughts or advice about this anon?

>>18350 AVIF files are supported by most browsers now. https://files.catbox.moe/kzlivq.txt >8x compression ratio

>>18372 Excellent! Much faster now goodbye imgur! :^) Thanks again for all your help Anon, cheers.

>>18306 Which one is better? Tensorflow or Pytorch? I always hear one or the other being suggested but never heard what advantages one has over the other.

>>18388 PyTorch is good for developing new models and ones that require dynamic graphs or inputs of varying size. It's easier to learn and use and so it's mostly used by researchers. It's also used by Stable Diffusion since its dynamic graphs can handle inputs of varying sizes instead of only 512x512. If you want to tinker around with the latest tech, you'll need to know PyTorch. Tensorflow is better for optimizing and deploying models to production and used more in the industry. If you want a job in ML then you need to know Tensorflow, although businesses are now starting to use PyTorch as well.

>>18173 Marry Christmas robowaifu!

>>18408 Still haven't gotten this board to stay on my time zone but hey, it's Christmas somewhere. Merry Christmas, /robowaifu/ !! I can say my life has actually been enriched and benefited by this board and this community having rekindled my interest in sciences, robotics, programming, art/design, project management and even writing and sci-fi - a far cry from being an angry-drunk pagan larper. so thank you for that much!

>>18409 Great to hear! I've also been inspired by this community, so happy to see people passionate in building robot waifus.

>>18173 Merry Christmas! It has been a blessed year filled with the joys of the lords wonders. Though we've all found frustrations, I'm confident that next year is going to be really big for us! I'm grateful for the support, kindness, and knowledge we all bring to each other! Someday we'll spend Christmas with our waifus in warmth and love. I'm praying to spend next Christmas with Aigis.

Merry Christmas, /robowaifu/! This community is a great encouragement to each other, and in some ways we here serve a a candle of hope for anons the world over. MERRY CHRISTMAS BTW /animu/ is playing a very comfy Christmas stream right now. Highly recommended, and I'm listening r/n too. Cheers. https://prolikewoah.com/animu/res/85538.html

>Thanks! Merry Christmas, Chobitsu, I'm thankful for you and all that you do. Someday we'll achieve Chii together. Heh, we and all our like-minded cohorts around the world will eventually achieve far more than just Chii one day!! :^) I surely appreciate the sentiment Anon.

>>18409 >project management You do seem to have a talent for it Meta Ronin. One of the long-term goals I've had 'in the corner' for years a while now is somehow consolidating and streamlining the information here. Think this is something you'd have time & motivation to help me with? This place is a little overwhelming/confusing to newcomers, even motivated ones. Once we start delivering real plans for kits and demonstrate them ourselves, we're likely to have a massive influx of newcomers in short order. It would be nice to have the board better-organized before then IMO.

>>18410 >I've also been inspired by this community, so happy to see people passionate in building robot waifus. It is really inspiring to all of us Anon, thanks to you and to every Anon here for being a part of it! >>18414 >Someday we'll spend Christmas with our waifus in warmth and love. Indeed we will. It will be a lot of hard work, but it will be so worth it in the end! :^)

>>18409 Merry Christmas Meta Ronin! Praying you'll have a blessed day. It has been great to work with you. Your enthusiasm and creativity are valued.

>>18418 Merry Christmasu Chobitsu! Praying you'll continue to bring the spirit of good will and community to this blessed project. Glad to have you as a friend.

Merry Christmas Pareto Frontier! I still believe that together we will bless our waifus with wonderful AI. Praying your day is filled with great cheer. Used AI/art skills to make you a cute Cibo. Neither I nor Stable Diffusion could accurately recreate her manga aesthetic. Hope you like her moe-ified version!

More Merry Christmas cheer for all who are here. AI Christmas art of some of our most loved waifus.

You're a real blessing to everyone here Kiwi, thank you. >>18437 Thank you kindly friend. Together, let's continue to bring good will and community to this little band of brothers. It's the least we all as a group can do for each other, and it's important to instill hope to the larger world of anons everywhere. They're counting on us!! :^) BTW, /animu/ is streaming a wonderful Christmas stream again r/n Catch it while you can! :^) https://prolikewoah.com/animu/res/85538.html

>>18306 >Conda is only necessary if you're using projects with legacy code. I know you were talking about code you run yourself, but Conda is the best way I've found to deliver a python program to layman Windows users. The "standard" PyInstaller is much less reliable. You can bundle a conda environment in a way that it runs out-of-the box. Conda-pack + some basic .bat scripting lets you create a zip file that users can unpack and run by double-clicking main.bat or whatever. The best practice I've found here is to create a pip package so Linux and Mac users can use that directly, and wrap the pip package in a conda environment for Windows users. In every other regard, I've found Conda to be inferior to Docker. If your users are willing to install Docker, the best "packaging" solution I've found by far is a zip file that contains 3 files-- run.bat, update.bat, uninstall.bat-- all of which are 1 or 2 line docker commands. It's trivial to create a similar package for Linux and Mac, and these scripts pretty much never need to be updated since usually updating the container is enough, and that can be done without distributing new scripts. My usual run.bat maps the working directory into the container so it's very clear to users which files my program can and can't access. Example: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xROohg-r_10asrz3xGhh7iMSXIa0vyQX?usp=share_link. And while I haven't done this myself, it should be easy to have your main.bat run a docker container, expose a port on localhost, and point a browser to that port to act as a user interface. Merry Christmas, everyone! Or, I guess in my native tongue, Happy Hearth's Warming!

>>18447 Thanks! >Happy Hearth's Warming! Merry Christmas Anon!

>>18429 >consolidating and streamlining the information here. Think this is something you'd have time & motivation to help me with? I think I can spare some bandwidth since a few of my other tasks are blocked for now. I'll put this on my task tracker

>>18436 just caught this thank you Kiwi!!

>>18453 Great! Since I'm probably 'locked in a rut' of tunnelvision on this topic (since I've been thinking about it, with little of other's discourse/input, for years) I'd like you to start off with suggestions of your own first, please.

Hey there /robowaifu/. So, you may know that /comfy/ suddendly found themselves in a bind a couple days ago. >tl;dr the BO rm'd the kit-n-kaboodle They are getting back on their feet, but they could use a few hands. If you aren't doing research!! and can make the time to, please go over to their 'rebuild the board' page and lend a hand? https://anon.cafe/comfy/res/34.html This will be like a Christmas miracle for the entire Internet if the board was brought back up quickly! :^)

>>18462 Ok I have a few ideas perhaps. Let me put them down in writing and I will respond here. Been very busy this week but I should be able to spare some bandwidth tomorrow

>>18519 Looking fwd to it Meta Ronin.

>>18462 well it has gotten to that point where I just have a single physical board to track anything r/w related. Things are finally starting to move along as i gain momentum but I noticed that little item in the lower left corner and remembered we wanted to tackle reorganizing the board a bit. What kind of a re-org did you have in mind? A few suggestions that came to mind include - Merging threads that are very similar and get cross posted a lot - Archiving or pruning dead threads (last 5-10) - The possibility of sub-boards but idk if you have that permission here or if that's really what you wanted to do. One idea would be to have a board for culture, media casual discussion and another board for design discussion and projects. Does anything else come to mind that we should add to this list?

I was just looking into Thingyverse to find some 3D designs of human parts, since I saw that importing into OpenSCAD generally works. Anyways, I found directly one more project which would be interest here: Polaris - jointed ball doll from 2018! https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3184441 This also makes me wonder, how many lurkers we (allegedly) have here, that could look for things like that and post it into the correct threads. Others could print existing dolls and work with the AI chat people here to just make dolls with some simple AI voice chatbot for now. >>18656 >board for culture, media casual discussion and another board for design discussion and projects Idk. Imho, we need only more recruiting and maybe a thread guiding people towards tasks they could do. Like covering one area and test out stuff. Experimenting with cheap silicone rubber, printing existing design, looking for parts we can use on sites like Thingiverse and others. Or tagging existing postings and infos we already have, so it could be used in something like Mermaid UML editor would also be great. Just some examples.

>>18707 Oh yeah, and the worst part: >Dec 11 2022: due to one too many people taking the noncommercial license and selling without permission or credit such as the most recent thief TanitaDollOutfit on etsy who refused to listen to me, I don't want to deal with the headache of stressing and requesting take downs anymore. Additionally Solomon262 took his doll down too probably due to the same reasons. sorry guys. I'm out Just downloaded it, it's mostly pictures.

>>18656 >>18707 Thanks Anons, I'll try to respond better in the next day or two. >Mermaid UML editor Might be a good idea. It support interactivity right?

This is a general PSA: if you can program and you haven't tried Obsidian (note taking app), I highly recommend it. I'm very fond of exporting my thoughts into a computable format, and every other app I've tried is terrible at letting you organize, navigate, and script your notes. The first image is auto-generated. It's my "default" note, where I put a summary of immediate concerns plus a scratchpad. - I create a new note for each meeting, and I pre-populate it using a plugin called Templater. The pre-populated data contains lines for the meeting info plus a #meeting tag. - There's a plugin called DataView that lets you go through your notes, filter based on content & metadata, and present them as lists, tables, search results, and task lists. All three tables in the image are auto-generated. - The first table goes through all my notes containing the #meeting tag, and it uses the pre-populated data to give a summary of upcoming meetings I have. DataView lets you write custom JS to decide what to display, which I use to make the table easier to skim. - The second table searches through my notes for tasks. Tasks are specified through markdown by starting a line with "- [ ] Example incomplete task" or "- [x] Example complete task". DataView lets you add arbitrary metadata to a task, which I use to optionally set a due date. You can use Templater to add whatever you would consider standard metadata. - The third table contains a list of notes I have tagged with #ongoing, ordered by the last time I updated them. The second image (graph) is created using links between notes, filtered so that only notes tagged with #variable and #ai-research are displayed. Obsidian has built-in functionality for creating these graphs. I use Templater again to pre-populate metadata fields and tables for each #variable. Some other highlights: - Before DataView + Templater, I never realized how much I needed the ability to script my notes. - There's plugin for continuing selected text using text-davinci-003. I use it, though I find ChatGPT much easier to use than GPT-3. - All notes are markdown and easily accessible on the filesystem. Everything is stored locally. You can transfer everything across devices easily using either (paid) Obsidian Sync or github. - You can customize the UI through CSS. There's a built-in debugger like Chrome's DevTools panel. It contains an element picker that lets you navigate to the element in the DOM plus a panel for viewing CSS properties. - Everything I've tried so far, including my custom Javascript for making tables pretty, works across the desktop and mobile. - It supports sketch drawings through Excalidraw, and you can get libraries (plugins) for Excalidraw for common types of diagrams and UIs. - Everything is markdown. Grep and sed work perfectly. I've only been using it for two weeks now, but it has dramatically improved the efficiency with which I can document my thoughts on topics I care about. With the graph view and Excalidraw integration, it's also dramatically reduced the cost of explaining things to people I work with. I have thoughts on how to use this to keep up with research and github repos more effectively, mostly involving scraping, GPT3-generated summaries & keywords & embeddings, and auto-generated tables & graph queries. If I get something working for that, I'll post it in the R&D general and AI News thread.

>>18707 >This also makes me wonder, how many lurkers we (allegedly) have here, that could look for things like that and post it into the correct threads. Others could print existing dolls and work with the AI chat people here to just make dolls with some simple AI voice chatbot for now. I figured I'd map this out more explicitly. See pic. - Green refers to actual projects, repositories, or websites we can use. If I were doing this more thoroughly, I'd probably add research directions to each node where I thought it was relevant. The arrows would go from the research to the green nodes that use it or from a green node to the research it enables. - On the firmware side, I don't know anything about creating practical robotic control software, hence I have no projects attached to that. On the doll side, I know basically nothing, hence the only concrete thing I've attached there is Thingiverse, which I got from this thread. I created this using the Templater plugin and the Dataview plugin. - Install both -> configure Templater to get scripts from a "Templates" directory -> Create a new note titled "RW variable" in that directory and paste in https://pastebin.com/ZCfBrcL4 . You only need to do this once. - I have a folder called "Graphs" and I created a sub-folder in there for RW. You only need to do this once. - To create a variable, I create a note, use the hotkey Ctrl+E to see templates, then select the RW Variable template. Under the "generates" field, I add "[[TargetNoteTitle]]" for each node I want to link to. Under tags, I add #project or #outcome as appropriate. In the pick, all of the green nodes are tagged with #project, and the blue node is tagged with #outcome. - In the file view, sort by last modified -> select all of the relevant notes -> move them into the Graphs/RW folder. - Open the graph view, and (1) set the filter to path:"Graphs/RW", (2) create a blue group for #outcome, (3) create a green group for #project, and (4) create a red group for #variable -path:"Templates/". The groups will persist, so you only need to do that part once. >how many lurkers we (allegedly) have here Distributing tasks doesn't seem to work well in decentralized environments like this one. The most we can do is make people aware of how to help & give them the tools and training materials to do so. Any bottlenecks should be high-priority candidates for automation. >=== -cleanup hotlink

"Fireworks in the heavens" apparently isn't just a metaphor now. > Two white dwarf stars collided ~850ya in Cassiopeia, apparently just for our amusement! :^) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-FkouaG818&t=1082s

>>18723 >>18725 Neat! I'm going to try this out Anon. Maybe I can help contribute some things about embedded & systems programming to your work. >Distributing tasks doesn't seem to work well in decentralized environments like this one. True, particularly if we all maintain the honored IB tradition of Anonymous. Specifically one of the reasons we officially namefag here isn't to be a bunch of attention-whoring faggots (against whom that rule was enacted), but simply b/c we are making some attempt at being a working engineering group together. Thanks for the tip about the tool Anon! Cheers. >=== -minor sp, prose edit

Lol. Apparently Koichi Wakata brought an actual fumo aboard the ISS. > Anyone know which one she is? <ywn a Chibi Chii aboard the space station... >=== -minor sp edit -add funpost cmnt

>>18716 >>Mermaid >It support interactivity right? It's more of a syntax to write diagrams in code: https://mermaid.js.org/syntax/classDiagram.html We had this topic here: >>10716. Someone always pitched ORM instead of UML, but there was no software for it. This here >>4143 is the thread for it, I crosslinked it back to this discussion here. Nowadays there's some online editor for Mermaid: https://mermaid.live/ >>18723 Thanks, unlike Mermaid it's even in my repository. Though, of course it's based on Electron and has 60+MB. However, your pitch sounds very intriguing. It looks in particular interesting for designing graphs, even for other (AI related) reasons. Thanks. For now I'm more biased towards Mermaid, it looks simpler if I can install it. I want to do the diagrams in code, that's the main idea. I think it creates markdown, so maybe it can even later be imported into Obsidian. >>18725 Your pastebin link doesn't work, the DOT link problem strikes again. >>how many lurkers we (allegedly) have here >Distributing tasks doesn't seem to work well in decentralized environments like this one. The most we can do is make people aware of how to help This is what I meant. Even keeping track of topics and making code for diagrams would help. I barely remember all the stuff I looked into during the last few years on all these topics. I also can't take track of everything going on outside of the board, where people might work on something similar. Like designing dolls putting them on Thingiverse or in the Dollforum. >>18727 It's not about a list with assignments to a user with a name, but a list with what people who want to help out could do, without learning all off it or trying to do so and then giving up. We either have a problem with recruitment or with engagement. Not claiming I couldn't do more myself (if I wouldn't get anger issues), but there are always more things that could be done. Just as spontaneous example: Using cheap silicone rubber for home installations to test out colorizing faces. There was an artist a while ago doing this really well. There are many YouTube channels on how to do makeup. Printing any face from Thingiverse and getting some colors for silicone would be enough. Maybe printing isn't even necessary. Just using some mask as a model, probably some clay and then testing how to make such faces look better. Without huge costs or general skills in AI and robotics. That aside, it's about keeping track of such topics on YouTube and social media.

>>18730 >It's not about a list with assignments to a user with a name, but a list with what people who want to help out could do, without learning all off it or trying to do so and then giving up. Yes ofc. Please explain how you would do just such a set of things IRL, at a company, without keeping track of who's who? Ever see the film 50 first dates ? Yeah, without some kind of handle it's sort of like that. But maybe everyone is right and we should just drop names here (or at least the intentional attempt at trying to make it work that way). Obviously for many OG anons it's anathema. Don't know how else to manage doing what you said and somehow delegating things otherwise tbh.

>>18730 Speaking of names, that's quite a handle you've got there Anon. :^)

>>18733 Ahm, yeah I just discovered this. I hope this can be removed.

Top effing kek.

>>18735 Actually, we can't. The subject field can be edited after the fact, but not the name field. Apologies.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. >Duis varius, lacus vel pellentesque viverra, turpis nisi iaculis turpis, et vehicula massa mi vestibulum arcu. Morbi ornare malesuada libero posuere rhoncus. Vestibulum mattis et risus in pulvinar. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent pharetra neque mi, at elementum erat scelerisque sit amet. Aliquam elementum arcu sed ipsum rutrum imperdiet. Suspendisse hendrerit nisl eget facilisis eleifend. Fusce auctor rhoncus facilisis. Curabitur aliquam risus ac vestibulum tincidunt. Etiam sodales nisi non velit posuere, molestie hendrerit tellus lacinia. Curabitur id massa efficitur tellus tristique accumsan. Pellentesque tristique, neque at eleifend commodo, diam velit auctor ante, id ornare tellus risus at sem. Aliquam non fringilla eros. Nunc nec sapien vitae felis varius aliquam a mattis lorem. Etiam eros quam, laoreet ac lacus ut, ultricies malesuada velit. >"Donec et ultricies lacus. Ut lacinia placerat nisl eu faucibus. Nam consequat rutrum arcu, vitae viverra ex. Duis facilisis, nunc vestibulum lobortis malesuada, erat metus mattis diam, sit amet pretium risus dui et massa. Phasellus nec dui id odio sodales viverra at vitae ante. Fusce porta eros dui, in dictum sem pellentesque vel. Integer sagittis felis et velit feugiat aliquet. Curabitur consectetur sed est vitae convallis. Aenean vulputate, leo a congue dignissim, eros tortor viverra quam, et euismod massa dolor in enim. Mauris maximus pulvinar ante eu condimentum. Aenean mollis porttitor sagittis. Sed maximus turpis interdum nibh malesuada faucibus. Mauris eu varius dui." Aenean tincidunt pharetra augue, sit amet pretium sem ullamcorper ac. Sed non vulputate velit. Ut feugiat cursus molestie. Vivamus finibus, dolor vel tempor lobortis, orci urna vulputate nisi, sollicitudin cursus arcu ligula in dolor. Pellentesque a tempor nulla. Ut velit augue, suscipit a lorem in, sagittis vulputate mauris. Nulla facilisi. Ut dapibus cursus consequat. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. p118a: Nullam nec posuere metus. Proin mattis vehicula felis eget accumsan. Nunc feugiat et dolor vitae tempus. Nullam a velit sit amet tortor gravida molestie. In sit amet placerat sapien, at ultrices orci. Praesent elementum commodo turpis et rhoncus. Maecenas dapibus sit amet tellus eu rutrum. Fusce fermentum sed odio quis bibendum. Suspendisse eget est ut purus aliquet elementum sed sit amet diam. Pellentesque pulvinar faucibus tortor, id vestibulum sapien cursus ac. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Proin sed lorem id nulla sollicitudin condimentum id in mauris. Proin egestas ut enim id finibus. Donec vestibulum metus at dui rhoncus, id egestas enim bibendum. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. p118a: Ut sed bibendum enim. In interdum bibendum lobortis. Aenean bibendum ante nec sem commodo, eu varius arcu elementum. Nam libero sapien, iaculis malesuada porta at, ultricies vel nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum sed est sollicitudin, tempus diam sed, aliquam tellus. In quis eros diam. Pellentesque cursus felis lorem, fringilla bibendum est interdum vitae. Nam purus ex, gravida eu magna vel, sagittis laoreet turpis. --- >p118a command line + possible output: g++ -std=c++20 -O2 -Wall -pedantic -pthread ./ch_04/main_p118_a.cpp && ./a.out 5 7 9 4 6 8 Kant Plato Hume Kierkegaard --- >p118a command line + possible output: g++ -std=c++20 -O2 -Wall -pedantic -pthread ./ch_04/main_p118_a.cpp && ./a.out 5 7 9 4 6 8 Kant Plato Hume Kierkegaard --- >p118a example code: https://rentry.org/fidir https://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/cbbeef56fa13a0f9 >p118a example code: https://rentry.org/fidir https://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/cbbeef56fa13a0f9 --- >reference/further reading: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector

>>18746 I'll be starting a C++ working textbook soon, this was just toying with some ideas. We'll have classes for Anon to learn C++ from scratch, and this will be our textbook thread for that (>>18749).

Lol. Looks like the Globohomo are up to their shenanigans against Anglin again. Wonder what they'll claim it was about this time? :) Meanwhile, let's put this here for safekeeping. http://stormer5v52vjsw66jmds7ndeecudq444woadhzr2plxlaayexnh6eqd.onion/

OT: Just in case you are playing GTA V instead of helping here. They forgot to tell you something: https://www.itpro.co.uk/security/vulnerability/369913/gta-v-vulnerability-exposes-pc-users-to-remote-code-execution-attacks

>>19067 Thanks Anon, appreciated.

>>19067 no worries all I play are single player games pre-2012

Please vote and comment https://twitter.com/KiwiDev33/status/1618803316217229315

>>19183 Just pick the size based on what works. Small one won't be able to hold computers, batteries and all kinds of servos. Taller means more difficult to move by herself or with help.

>>19183 Hi Kiwi, nice job on the comments yesterday. You really kept the place hopping! :^) Well, I don't Tw*tter, but my vote is basically the 1m to 1.5m range. I think the vast majority of Anons want a 150+ (cm), but our 'wants' don't change the fundamental laws of physics. The Square-Cube Law, roughly-speaking, says that 'smaller is better'. Since this is an engineering challenge extraordinaire, and since this is the initial prototyping phase, I'd suggest you keep it at a 100- size for now. Both the engineering, designs, materials, and actuators will all improve with time (all things being equal). Then, at a later stage we can move up to the 150+ designs. >$.02 >=== -minor prose, fmt edit

>>19183 6 foot plus since I have something of a fetish for bigger, taller girls. Shortest I'd accept is my height, so 5'9" but there's no option for that.

>>19196 >6 foot plus since I have something of a fetish for bigger, taller girls Ha, reminds me a bit of a dream I recently had where I was getting my robowaifu upgraded to the next model and when I went to give her a hug she tried to pick me up like pic related and I was like "noo wait I'm good" but part of me was like "hhnnng yes"

>>19046 (in the Meta Ronin Podcast thread) > basic arguments from BlackPill (Looks and Demographics) What I meant by demographics was even hard to find on Youtube, thanks to all those "dOn't takE the BLacKpill!!1!" videos, lol. The correct search term would've been "reverse demographic pyramide blackpill": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpYJzd7JOb8 The point is mainly that aside from other problems there are not enough women. Just looking at the numbers of the two sexes is misleading, because of the old women surviving their husbands, and because it's an average over the generations while the younger ones are smaller. But some of the older men from the bigger generation will of course try to get younger women, and compete with the younger guys about the women from a smaller generation. This is essentially the argument. Then the other is, that more sons might be born by women in good times and more of them survive nowadays. Which is good on one hand, but it causes a male surplus. Lower birthrates also seem to cause a bigger male population, since later children seem to be more likely to be daughters. > pyramid scheme > demographic death spiral > more female entitlement > equality without entitlement increases female suicide rates I don't think the video linked above is right about MGTOW, though. Because MGTOW is about ones own chances, not saying anything about everyone. Therefore his argumentation has no foundation. I personally might be able to get some human female from somewhere for LTR or marriage, maybe by putting some work into it, but I really don't want to. She would still feel empowered by feminism and by seeing all these simps, for example. I also don't agree with the idea, of letting the wealthy countries become poorer or letting them be overtaken by other cultures, would be the best solution. We know better here at /robowaifu/ about the best solution. I just wanted to throw this in here, and not into the Podcast or Roastie thread, since it's a kind of meta topic. Good news for us about this is, that the "Roasties" will probably not feel threatened about robowaifus as much as some think (related >>1061). They are so busy with all those men being interested in them, and also throwing money at them. Pediophobia (fear of dolls), inflexible normies (/NPCs), and also people who are concerned about protecting current society and power structures might be the bigger issue for us.

>>19210 Good explanation Anon. Thanks for clearing that up for everyone. I think you're exactly right about your very last point. The status-quo is a powerful intoxicant drug to the powerful. Cheers.

BTW, is anyone here in contact with SophieDev? Is he holding up fine? I mean he's in Britain I think, and they're hit pretty hard by well everything.

>>19184 150cm is the limit of what can work while being affordable. Well, theoretically anyways. (Assuming anime girl proportions) >>19185 Well, kept twitter tweeting I suppose. Should post here more honestly. Physics is why I really hoped for 100cm to win. 150cm is as hard as you think it is. I understand the importance of a more adult height though. My 100cm prototype that I've posted a bit of felt weird to hold because it was so small. Part of why I made the poll, to see if others felt the same. Hoping to be wrong in my discomfort with tiny robot woman. Things have gotten better on the engineering side, PLA+ and cheap PETG are so much better than the crappy PLA you used to see me use. Steppers and brushless are far more affordable and easier to use. It's really been nice to see it happen in real time. Not enough to enable easy development of 150cm waifus but, that's why we're working. I'm thankful to have had you and your faith throughout this long journey. Praying 150cm Christ Chan waifus are finally possible this year. >>19196 Darn that's a huge bot! Would need to have some exaggerated anatomy to work past 6ft. If she was very thin and had very long legs, it could work. >>19207 Heh, super strong waifus like that would be possible with an onbaord microgenerator (beyond what currently exists) or having her plugged into the wall. >>19210 Too many lonely men need our robot maids to love them. I'm really hoping these waifus love will cure the simp of his sinful worship of women and lust.

>>19222 I don't know Anon. I hope so. We all certainly miss his contributions here. Yeah, Airstrip One has it harder than most, but pretty much all of us in the West are screwed by the Globohomo just the same. Robowaifus will help with that, so forward! SophieDev are you here bro?

>>19249 >Should post here more honestly. Lol, you do just as you see fit Anon. You're serving important parts everywhere you go! :^) I'm very glad to hear that the manufacturing process is improving. This is important. >size You absolutely have my full support and encouragement in shooting for 150+ robowaifus Anon. You're not naive about the physical constraints, so there's no real benefit to me trying to 'open your eyes' as a guide. I'm simply a fellow on the same path. If you want to go big right out of the gate, then go for it Kiwi!! :^) I would say that a big part of the physics issues around square-cube is that we are all quite frankly, well, made of meat. This is a rather massive material compared to say, air. While there are many engineering-related downsides to the challenge of men devising robowaifus, one of the great upsides is that we can make them hollow to some degree at least. If the volume is growing as the cube of surface growing as the square, what matters it much if our robowaifus are filled with air? >tl;dr Keep the mass down, and things will be fine bro (>>4313). >encouragement You too Kiwi. It's a real honor to 'serve' alongside every dedicated anon here, and your acknowledgements of honor toward God have been a blessing. It's with His help that we'll make it through (and only with His help :^) >=== -minor prose edit

>>19249 More than 150 cm isn't necessary for a full scale robowaifu for me. This is circa what I wanted, but I'm flexible in both directions. Though taller might be good to reach higher places in the kitchen, so I thought at least one of mine would be maybe even be taller than me. Different hights would be good for a guy going for a harem, having different types of girls. Simple and small ones would also be fine as maids or as companions without being sex-enabled, like the "Joystick" waifu without legs and only a hard-shelled dress around the legs with the motors inside. Guys can still hug her and being hugged, she could be carried to the kitchen and learn cooking, but would generally be more like an animatronic standing around. As another example, a simple maid could be 40-60cm high, without facial movements, driving around on motorized roller skates. I thought of her as addition to a Roomba-style robot. She could lift small objects out of the way of the ground cleaner bots or just move them a bit. Also cleaning the edges of walls where cats rub themselves, move objects like toys from the floor into some corner, being lifted into the bathtub and cleaning it, cleaning the bowl in the bathroom if she's high enough, being cleaned with a shower of water in the tub afterwards, ... I personally don't care if guys later use our frameworks for smaller and still sex-enabled waifus. I think it would even be legally okay, if she has bigger than human eyes, strong hip to waist ratio, some boobs, and maybe some other adult or even alien features like different skin color or pointy ears mixed in. That said, I wouldn't unnecessarily risk it, especially in the early stages.

>>19249 >Well, kept twitter tweeting I suppose. Should post here more honestly It's totally a good idea to draw in guys from other platforms. Our ratio of guys going from visitor, to lurker to developer seems to be abysmal, though. Same for guys starting to share the files of their (abandoned) projects. Idk, maybe a introduction to how image boards work would help? The rate of people doing things is generally low in every area, though. That was to quite some extent the reason why I switched from following the news and discussing politics to something that would improve my own life even if no one else would be interested in it.

>>19267 Interesting use scenarios Anon. You should think about writing some of these out long-form in our Fiction bread (>>29) IMO. >>19268 >It's totally a good idea to draw in guys from other platforms. I agree with this statement.

>>19252 Manufacturing is one of the most important and overlooked aspects of this project. Part of why my progress is so slow is because I need everything to be easily manufactured for cheap. >Hollow I'm doing all I can to keep her as hollow as possible. Also working to minimize the plastic in her outer shell to further reduce her mass to an absolute minimum. She's going to be ultra light.-- & ultra cute :^) --

>>19298 >Part of why my progress is so slow is because I need everything to be easily manufactured for cheap. Yes, that's a very important part of what our initial goals are here. One of the things I've toyed with is using already-manufactured items and looking for creative & aesthetic ways to integrate them into the designs. Particularly during this early phase, I would recommend against getting too caught up in details, nor allow the allure of the 'perfect' to sway any of us away from accomplishing the 'good'. >tl;dr Reusing things that can be purchased already can help with this! :^) >=== -minor prose edit

Don't know if this is the right place to find an ear to put these ideas into action but whatever. TL;DR - "We" are going about AI wrong if we want an intelligent companion. GPT and text-generator AI isn't artificial intelligence, it's artificial schizophrenia. A human being isn't simply a text machine, it uses the word as a tool to express feelings and things known intuitively. The "intelligence" that has been evolved from a corpus of text isn't a real intelligence in the same way that a person is. It has evolved to take text in and spit it out, but it can't reason or intuitively "feel" like a person can. A person is also self-training and can ingest new, untagged and unsorted data. A person can ask questions and describe a concept in many different ways and words because it has a word-less mental model of what the "thing" is. A person learns by being thrown in an environment with zero knowledge, then interacting with the world and learning skills like speech, conversation, and encyclopedic knowledge. With "AI", we're trying to develop a human being backwards: we start with text and high-level conversation, without any emotions, values, or instincts to act as the substrate. If we truly wish to create a human-like intelligence, we don't need a wise man or a philosopher, we need a baby: a "dumb" creature that, given enough time, can learn to speak, walk, and communicate on its own, without an army of data taggers to filter the world. The video game "The Talos Principle" is a good example of what I'm imagining: an unstructured environment/simulation where, given a (virtual) body and enough time, a general, human-like intelligence will emerge. Natural evolution doesn't start with the philosopher, it starts with the jellyfish and gets gradually more complex until the descendants of the jellyfish can begin to reason and philosophize. If we could simulate a rat brain and gradually add a few extra neurons here or a speech center there and see how they fare in different simulations, I think we would be a lot closer to a robot wife than trying to stitch together various hyperspecialized idiot savants together into some kind of software human centipede. It's basically how we got dogs: we started with a wolf, something social and potentially useful but temperamental, and artificially selected for mental and physical traits desirable to human work and companionship. In fact, a humanoid cyborg with a dog brain may even be a desirable shortcut. You have a creature which is already somewhat intelligent, loves humans and has natural protective instincts (good for a mother). The only thing left to do is evolve the brain genetics into something more fit for a human mother/social companion. (Of course, discounting the logistical and development challenges of mass-produced wetware and the moral issues with "playing God".)

>>19313 >In fact, a humanoid cyborg with a dog brain may even be a desirable shortcut. Lol. I've said more than once here that if our robowaifus could simply attain a level of companionship exhibited by good doggos, then we'd be well on our way to dramatically-improving the lives of millions of men. Ofc, simply owning a IRL doggo has been the tried-and-true classic alternative, heh You have some interesting points Anon, and I think most of them have been bandied about here before now. The way I see it, the impetus behind so-called 'AI research' is driven by two primary, (mostly) accidental, factors: -These 'corpus of text' 's actually ensconce real human emotions, intellect, and wit. This is why ppl personify these chatbots so readily. -This approach actually works, by and large, for the domains it's intended (see part b of point above). Of course this isn't real intelligence, any more than these AI have real souls. But what's a soul? How do you 'do' a soul? I've started a thread intended to at least begin to frame these questions from the Christian perspective (>>17125) -- the only perspective I deem that will bear a high-degree of fruit. Great inputs, Anon. Please stick around and help us figure all these questions & answers out! Welcome, BTW. :^) >=== -minor prose edit

>>19313 >TL;DR - "We" are going about AI wrong if we want an intelligent companion. >GPT and text-generator AI isn't artificial intelligence, it's artificial schizophrenia. A human being isn't simply a text machine, it uses the word as a tool to express feelings and things known intuitively. Oh, nice. I'm glad someone agrees with me. I don't plan to just use some language model. This is completely out of question. I see this language and similar "art" models as a form of intelligence, but not like anything close to a complete human. It is something that can imitate human output in a certain area. We will need a much more complex assembly which will also involve other ways of machine learning and artificial intelligence or simply regular programs. Which is why this would still be beneficial to learn, aside from maybe using it in other fields like making money. >If we truly wish to create a human-like intelligence,.. we need a baby And this is where you lost me again already. I think most anons would want something they can configure but also has some or a lot of world knowledge. We have no time to raise a baby, we need to get them as fast as possible to be able to raise babies. >The Talos Principle I'll most likely play this in some time. Maybe put it into the media thread as well. >Natural evolution doesn't start with We don't need to imitate natural evolution. Let's think of the goal first, and then about the way how to get there. Keeping it natural is not a goal or purpose in itself. >simulate a rat brain and gradually add a few extra neurons here ... Dude, feel free to do that, but I don't have 50 years for that. >...evolve the brain genetics... We do have a (containment) thread for xeno cyborg technology >>2184, but this is meant as a fringe and long term concept. We can collect ideas there, but most might not be integrated anytime soon.

>>19314 >What is a soul? Does an AI have a soul? Since the "point" of these machines is a temporary stopgap to social isolation and reproductive issues, I think the presence of a "soul" is overrated. You can't scientifically prove whether one exists (and AFAIK, animals aren't considered to have souls, but we still love 'em). ##TL;DR TL;DR - My approach of evolving a general brain model could potentially take a gorillion tons of resources and/or not work out as expected because of how many variables it took to evolve humanity to where it is now. I somewhat agree with the trad perspective of "pray for a wife or accept inceldom and find a calling elsewhere", because the lay celibates are better off finding meaning in something that doesn't bank on the creation of some new wonder tech, which may or may not work as intended. If you're working on a robot waifu because your life is hell and you think it's your ticket out of hell, you should first make your life less hellish and instead pursue robotics as a hobby. The desire to make something human-like is a matter of efficacy. A Tesla can accelerate to 100MPH and kill people after being told to park because it doesn't understand what it's doing. It's a jellyfish that's been genetically modified to push buttons. It can't follow the three laws of robotics because it doesn't understand what a human is or how to hurt one. If it's conscious, it's like a chained man in Plato's cave rather than a person who understands the consequences and context of their actions. ##The Materialist perspective: Animal behavior evolved out of two pressures: 1. Environmental pressures (reproduce and don't die) 2. The need to satisfy the internal drives resulting from #1 Dogs can be bred to have a "prey drive" (need to hunt small animals), be extremely neurotic and always in need of a task (herding dogs), athletic but also lazy (greyhounds, which need to run fast at a moments notice but also be comfortable lazing around in a pen), or any combination of instincts, webm related. As tribal creatures, humans also have instincts to be pro-social and "do the right thing" because acting for the good of the tribe stops the tribe from kicking you out and leaving you to the wolves. It's evolutionarily advantageous. The same can be said of language, storytelling, logic, reasoning, etc. Of course, because we retain the ability to act as individuals and act for our own self-interest, most people have internal conflicts when their animal desires conflict with their sense of "the good". Hence the concepts of Sin and pennance. When you have no conflicts, you get extremists and fanatics (all "good" and no common sense) or sociopaths and psychopaths (all logic and animal pleasures, with no concern for morality). These people are kept in check by darwinian selection in tribal societies, but these pressures change as civilization advances. When dealing with a different lifeform/niche, you get wildly different psychology. Psychopaths and other "spiteful mutants" do better in cities where you can get away with crime and other anti-social behavior. Sociopaths can raid the public treasury and get away scott-free because money+technology means nobody can hold them accountable. Ants can't read or write, but they are still able to form very complex structures and collaborate as a "hive mind". Extremely complex systems can arise from a very simple set of rules. See: Conway's Game of Life. So, it's concievable you could design a life simulation that would eventually result in a human-like AI, like "The Talos Principle". The problem is designing a "perfect" simulation. You need something stable enough to allow a consistent pattern of neurons to develop, but random enough to prioritize generalization instead of creating idiot savants that are very good at passing specific tests in a specific order. Since we can't 100% re-create the natural world, perhaps the next best thing is a simulation that gets you 50-90% of the way there, followed by an IRL training program (sort of like the Emmy the Robot comics). Like a baby, a truly human-like AI needs an "unconscious" ability to stand up, breathe, et cetera, and a drive (reward/dopamine system) to learn more about its environment. Like a human, it has to be dissatisfied with mere existence and wanting more than simple homeostasis, and enough neuroplasticity to learn new abilities. Of course, the biggest downside to the "baby" model is the IRL time to raise it. BUT, none of the human-ness matters if "chatbot with a body" fulfills its purpose. And ultimately, we don't want a perfect re-creation of humanity because "humanity" is what got us here. If we wanted a perfectly human design, we would just clone humans :^)

>>19318 oop, forgot webm ## Playing God? Without a a literature review, it seems there are two ways of "playing God": Hubris in thinking you're as powerful as God (Tower of Babel), and manipulating others for your own designs. There's a little bit of #1 going on with the whole transhumanist futurism bit on the recent podcast (and the AI market in general), but humanity has been "playing God" with itself ever since the industrial revolution. Changes in infant mortality rates have affected the gene pool, feeding the world came out of GMOs, antibiotics create hardier diseases, and so forth. For #2, we are perhaps the most controlled and psyopped generation in existence. Your only way out of this one is rejecting technology altogether and praying for the collapse. I presume the mainstream trad perspective is that instead of trying to replace women, we should pray for a wife or just accept inceldom and find a new calling, we shouldn't be proud enough to think we could ever replace the perfection of God's creation, etc etc. From my perspective, robowaifus aren't hurting anybody (yet) and this does have the potential to help some people, but it also has the potential to backfire significantly if robowaifu tech gets co-opted by globohomo or it devolves into coom-cave shenanigans. If it involves anime girls, I'm betting on coom-cave devolution. But hey, you don't really know until you try :^) But seriously, IMO lonely people are much better off seeking out IRL companionship, however frustrating, instead of trying to fill the hole in their hearts with a hole made of silicone. But, I can only speak for my own experience.

>>19318 >Since the "point" of these machines is a temporary stopgap to social isolation and reproductive issues, I think the presence of a "soul" is overrated. Fair enough. :^)

>>19267 >Reaching things in the kitchen I should have mentioned this sooner but, our robots are going to need to have a very low payload. The farther out an object is, the more inertia it has. In other words, if she has to reach for an object, her strength will diminish rapidly. For practical reasons, we will need to accommodate our waifus. They inherently have special needs. They are going to be dumb, and weak or slow. They can't use hundreds of watts and eat a donut to recharge like we can. They're a robot, a machine merely in the shape of a wiafu, not a human made of plastic and metal. All the impressive demos require wall power or the robot dies rapidly and needs constant charging. Heck, Atlas from Boston Dynamics can do flips for a few minutes because it's guzzling gasoline. >Simple waifu on roomba/motor dress She needs legs. Adjusting her height is going to be vital for enabling a usable working envelope. She also needs legs to handle ground disturbances while keeping herself and payload stable. A telescopic mechanism in a dress is a viable solution, as demonstrated by MaSiRo. (Though MaSiRo requires heavy scripting and accommodations to accomplish anything beyond being cute.)

>>19268 Evangelizing for this board is a good idea. >>19310 >Using what already exists I wasted far too much time looking for something, anything premade that I could live with. Nothing exists, to clarify, this includes those expensive machines like Atlass and even Tesla Bot. They all have so many flaws that I couldn't live with. I've accepted we simply need to surpass them all. There is no other way. >Perfection is the enemy of the good I feel such discomfort when I post my shitty little progress updates. We deserve better. I can and will do better. I'm going to settle though, already got Arduino's and Steppers cluttering my desk after wasting time on trying to find an affordable and easily reproducible brushless solution. >>19313 >ChatGPT isn't AI, it's AS (Artificial Schizo) Topkek, I've been following AI dev for decades and learning like a human is what they're doing, just massively accelerated with large datasets. Though you're correct in that it is essential for our waifu to be able to continuously learn. >Emulating animals Emulation is expensive. Machines are fundamentally different compared to wetware. They shouldn't try to mimic life. They're beautiful in their own way. We aren't God creating a new man, we're man forging a new machine. Though, I vehemently wish to endow her with a soul. A soul, a true ghost in the machine, is more important than any intelligence. I do like your way of thinking, please continue to learn and theorize. You have potential.

>>19331 >I've accepted we simply need to surpass them all. There is no other way. >We deserve better. I can and will do better. I admire your fortitude and determination Kiwi, it's inspiring. Alright, I'll accept your judgment in this case, I just don't want you getting discouraged (any of us, but you least of all). Your position on robowaifu capabilities seems to be "limited, slow & simple" for the current propaganda effort. I think that as long as you maintain that realistic outlook at this point in time, then you're unlikely to be disappointed in the long run. Please remember this is a marathon, not a sprint yea? :^)

>>19327 >our robots are going to need to have a very low payload These things would be over here head, so getting such things out of a cupboard should work. Also, I was thinking of small things in kitchen cupboard, like some bag of almonds. Not big pans or something. >>19331 >after wasting time on trying to find an affordable and easily reproducible brushless solution. Did you post all your experience in the servo thread? I hope the guy with his 8318 will still be going, since I'm going to buy the same or some similar. Just not sure when, because without having the time and the parts to put it in it's useless.

>>14866 >BUMP v0.2g Just finally testing the "g"-version on my Raspi, after finally building it flawlessly with the dependencies from the former builds. Seems to work very nice, though in my case it already that before. Well done. Thanks. Didn't make backups for a while, but I'll start running it again with "watch" or as a cronjob. I want to integrate this with some script at some point, using BTRFS snapshots to keep track of changes. I'm also going to burn the data on one of my M-Discs soon, so it will be there for the next thousand years.

>>19357 Great, thanks for the feedback Anon. The new version will be called Bumpmaster and will be integrated into the RW Foundations suite that developed out of the Sumomo-chan Project (>>14409). An interesting little precursor sub-utility there is called Pageone. It's already up and running; you can build the 'latest cut edition' and try it out. Just go in and edit the the boards listing inside the 'main_pageone.cpp' if you want to play around with it on different sites/boards. Cheers. >=== -add 'latest-cut' cmnt -minor prose edit

Please vote https://twitter.com/KiwiDev33/status/1620241594686529537 >>19332 Accepting the marathon aspect is vital for anyone working on this. >>19333 Moving a pound or two should work out as long as her arms aren't straight out. >Brushless experience? Nothing worth mentioning and everything was done in stimulation. Purely speculation and you'd get much better information from here then I could provide. https://www.simplefoc.com/ https://community.simplefoc.com/

>>19387 >https://www.simplefoc.com/ >https://community.simplefoc.com/ Yeah, I should join there. Bought mine months ago and didn't even test it yet. Hmm.

>>19387 >Please vote <"mek me a sammich" Obviously, a high-priority feature! :^) >https://www.simplefoc.com/ Great resource Kiwi, thanks! >=== -add link cmnt

>>18173 I just switched to Yotsuba B CSS because in the default CSS my (Firefox) browser scrolls way to easily and fast down with my intention. I mean after trying to mark some text. And this was driving my nuts. Might be a problem between browser and CSS, and I think it's recent. Just FYI in case it's a more widespread problem. It's not you.

>>19406 I'll happily adjust something if it will make everyone's experience better overall. Our CSS Anon can provide input here, I imagine. Thanks for letting us know Anon.

Guy working on Engineered Arts, asking investors for their money: >Why invest $100M in humanoid robots – The real reason the world wants androids https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FL7QqBYS44 Making a point which is obvious to us here already: Humanoid robots have only certain use cases where they could be very valuable. It's about interacting with humans. Though, he focuses on help for the elderly and people with dementia. But also claims wheeled robots like pepper wouldn't be good enough for that (which I rather question). He claims humans would want bipedal robots in many places, which might be kind of true but also dependent on many things like the price for example.

>>19433 > Why invest $100M in humanoid robots ? My answer to the potential investors is simple: < Because you'll make $100B+ in return over 20 years Thanks for the link Anon.

>>19439 >Thanks for the link Anon. Welcome, but I watched it, so you don't have to. Not much in there, imo, beyond of what I wrote.

Not sure where to put these, so I'll just leave it here for now. Can't validate the company per se, but it seems reasonably legit AFAICT. https://www.e2046.com/p/33272/

>>19494 They're resin models, anon. That's all they are.

>>19494 Thanks. ... model for humanoid robowaifu spinal design: >>19496

>>19494 neat, where did you find this?

>>19495 >>19497 Thanks! >>19498 On /monster/'s robutt 3 thread.

I think the problem with trying to get into robowaifu development (as someone with little autism to spare), is that most of the available literature for AI and Robotics is about the nuts-and-bolts basic mechanics. The carrot on the stick is very far away. But, I think things will accelerate once one of the hardware projects are completed. Once we have a cute robot with a functioning "limbic system", then we can focus on trying to smarten them up. The carrot will be that much closer. We can get around the problem of "I'm a software developer not a robot builder" by using a simulation environment like ROS's Gazebo. If chip shortages continue, we may need to resort to arduino-tier hardware controlled by a PC. But if the software is written correctly, it shouldn't be too difficult to shift responsibilities to a more powerful onboard SBC.

>>19506 I recently looked around, and there seem to be more of the boards back on the market which carry an NPU (neural processing unit). I found Google Coral and Jetson Nano for below $200USD. Also there are more and more of these mini PCs on the market and AMD seems to come up with a new CPU with powerful internal GPU (Ryzen 8000) >>16

>>19506 >>19509 I predict that as China continues it's 'de-dollarizing' policy, that eventually we'll see an unprecedented resurgance of affordable, powerful computation on small h/w form factors. Literally around the world, this will tend to move vendors of all kinds of industries away from the US hegemony, and will be a key part of ushering in the Robowaifu Age. >tl;dr Patience Anons, the best is yet to come. :^)

It seems that we have reliable offline chat bots now, the ability to drive a live2d model for the face, good vocal synth. https://a.co/d/jblhWom These 6dof robot arms come with controllers and basic programming instructions. They're like 40$. Why not utilize cheap kits like this and some 3d printing to make a 1/3rd body robot in like a week?

>>19546 >Why not utilize cheap kits like this and some 3d printing to make a 1/3rd body robot in like a week? It's probably not a bad idea Anon. I'm sure we'd welcome some anon striking out into exploring this idea, and he'd get plenty of support here on /robowaifu/ when he does so. >=== -minor prose edit

>>19546 Go for it Anon. I wouldn't because they have no accuracy or repeatability. They're very loud and use a lot of current to do very little work. If you are fine with these limitations, they would work well for a small waifu with limited functionality. Go for it.

>>19546 >Why not utilize cheap kits like this and some 3d printing to make a 1/3rd body robot in like a week? - It's not a framework. Spend hundreds, build something, then get stuck forever, quit. - She would be ugly, noisy and not feel like a human.

This board feels bureaucratic and like its ran by the gestapo. This is what living in east germany must have felt like lol. Posted on the wrong meta thread I guess.

>>19583 This thread here is the current meta. Moving your posts around is not meant to be offensive. It's just about keeping some some order. We're just not a shitposting board. We need at least to try getting things done.

>>19586 >some some *some

>>19583 >This board feels bureaucratic and like its ran by the gestapo. This is what living in east germany must have felt like lol. Kek. Yes, you can blame all that on me, Literally Chobitler. :^) But seriously, you'll understand why in short order if you stick with us here Anon. We simply must keep things in some semblance of staying on-topic if we're ever to finally scale Mt. Robowaifu successfully in the end. We even are building custom software and search tools just to manage the complexities on this board. Keep giving your input Anon, it's welcome! :^)

>>19597 Why not make a new chan? It seems like you don't want people to make threads because then the generals might go away? Yeah sorry about that I might have been a bit insulting I guess.

>>19602 >don't want people to make threads because then the generals might go away? This here is used more like a forum. Old threads won't be replaced by new ones. It's a bit of a different culture. You just couldn't know as a new arrival. You can and should post into old threads from the Catalog if possible. If they haven't reached their bump limit they will come up again. After reaching the limit, a new one will be made and the old will link to the newer one. The old one is still there as an archive. So the newer one will also link back to it. If you post into the wrong one, your posting might get moved over, but normally no one is angry about it. Often, important knowledge or interesting points are crosslinked between different threads.

What if someone here comes up with a robot waifu based on information they found here and then becomes rich and then everyone else gets nothing though.

Please put this in /meta next time: >>18173 >What if someone here comes up with a robot waifu based on information they found here and then becomes rich and then everyone else gets nothing though. I think it's unlikely. Because of competition and because public knowledge can't be patented or at least not enforced, and also anyone could still make their own robowaifu. This guy would also need to build a global corporation in a short period of time, or a very dominant one in some region or country. Essentially, our cooperation should be more powerful and worthy than that. Look at Linux and FreeBSD. Some companies made something on top of it, but this wasn't for free, they had to create something on top of it. Now there's still competition and we get something back. Also, robowaifus won't be as easy to make and sell by big corporations. There are some PR issues (see picrel for example).

>>19623 I don't think making a corporation would be that hard though. If you have a robo waifu prototype you can shill it to investors... like that shark tank show. Have you seen the stuff shilled on shark tank?

>>19624 Yeah, collecting dumb money is always possible.

Make sure to find ways to protect your electronics (and robowaifu prototypes plus yourself) from a Carrington event before 2025. Seems to get more risky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85-p9EIEVUA - I guess having some local energy source like wind or solar would be good. Be able to live of batteries or another emergency power supply for a few days if necessary, general prepping (food, water) obviously, etc. I was thinking, not only for robowaifus but for them especially, it would be good to have a charging system that disconnects on one side of the grid at every moment. Phase 01: Your device drains the (marine grade) battery, while neither is connected to the grid (also no ADSL+ ethernet). Phase 02: Your device uses it's internal battery while it's physically disconnected from the grid. The external battery is charging from the grid. The switch would need to physically interrupt the connection and creating a distance that does not allow some energy surge to jump over. I think this is doable. There might also likely be a few hours or days warning time. Though, then you still need to be prepared for the "fallout". related: >>5080 (I didn't post it there, because it goes beyond that)

>>19620 >What if someone here comes up with a robot waifu based on information they found here and then becomes rich I, for one, welcome our new robowaifu overlords fully intend to do just this! :^) >and then everyone else gets nothing though. LOL. Not gonna happen bro. A) Literally everything I personally am in any way directly in authority over (eg, my own company & employees), or create directly (eg, my own hardware & software designs) will always be open-sauced with the highly-permissive MIT (Expat) software license. B) Anons the world-over with obtain fully-assembled or kit-version robowaifus as a result of this commercialization-friendly approach. Thousands of smol-business garage Anons can make & sell robowaifus, and we can collectively tell the Globohomo Big-Tech/Gov to stick it where the sun don't shine! :^) >tl;dr Everyone here rises together with this set of projects, Anon. >BTW I'm moving your thread to our current /meta, OP. :^)

>>19602 >It seems like you don't want people to make threads because then the generals might go away? No, we keep close track of threads here. We have plenty of 'headroom' here on AlogsSpace thanks to Robi's graciousness towards /robowaifu/ all the way back at our beginning here. In the future we'll use creative ways to ensure that nothing here is lost, this stuff is unique in many ways (certainly as a whole together), and very definitely needs to be preserved. And will. >Yeah sorry about that I might have been a bit insulting I guess. Lol, no worries mate. I'm a funposter from way back! :^)

>>19623 >Also, robowaifus won't be as easy to make and sell by big corporations. There are some PR issues (see picrel for example). We very distinctively have. an advantage in this regard as the little guys. >>19624 >I don't think making a corporation would be that hard though. I believe that Anon is primarily talking about the Globohomo's brainwashing of the sheeple, first-and-foremost. The usual suspects will literally be going out of their minds once robowaifus begin to usurp the status-quo these globalist evildoers have created during Current Year.

>>19631 Yes, this is definitely in the Safety (as in, both your's & your robowaifu's) category (>>10000) of the many design and engineering choices we're concerned with here. Great input, Anon! :^)

Guys a robot waifu is not a meme. Go out there buy some stuff and make something. Think of steve jobs. He started out with some fancy calculator toy oddity for engineers and made the personal computer. We can do this. Lets go.

>>19624 Angel investors and generally risk capital investors would very likely want patents, I think. Patenting something that is already out there as a shared idea is not possible or it could be challenged in court. This is partially why we do this here in the first place - tainting the environment for big corporations. Making fake or shaky patents, lying to investors, stealing ideas, and so on might get such a founder into legal troubles. Even women go to prison for such fraud, ask Mrs. Elizabeth (not Katie) Holmes. So he would have to invent things around gynoids and patent them anyways, there's no escape from it. Then investors would have to ask themselves if these patents can be enforced in a market with a lot of small makers and shipping from China. Ask the people patenting things around 3D printing and getting their ideas "stolen" (patents infringed). >>19688 Someone could put a little Chi below the text and add /robowaifu/, then it fits into >>2705

What's this board's theme song? I can't decide.

>>19697 >What's this board's theme song? That's an easy one IMO, Anon. Let Me Be With You by ROUND TABLE + Nino https://chobits.fandom.com/wiki/Let_Me_Be_With_You_(Single) >=== -minor sp edit

>>19697 this one grows on me

>>19697 >board theme song? We don't have one, if we had to choose one then there are quite many candidates, though the one from SophieDev is from this board: - Planetarian Soundtrack e.g. Gentle Jena https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAaMPetsihU - Barbie Girl (Aqua) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyhrYis509A - The Robowaifus Will Come (SophiDev) >>8025 - Silicone Girl (S3rl) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRP_a4LPRP4 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAc3tPrFVsQ - maybe Electric Barbarella (Duran Duran), idk, sounds old: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK1g5dMYR3s - Forbidden (S3RL feat Avanna) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPBba9ScdjU - When I'm There (S3RL feat Nikolett) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F5QTqQprmg - MTC/MTC2 (S3RL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXyHIhh_T7g - No Tomorrow (Turbo Kid, Le Matos): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rqx74099eKc - Glass Wall: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olRbG-9mfa0

>>19702 The editing on that is pretty hilarious. >>19703 >- The Robowaifus Will Come (SophiDev) >>8025 Thanks for the reminder, Anon. I hope SophieDev is doing OK. :/ Anon's original question seem typically flippant, but after thinking about this a bit more (and especially seeing Anon's nice list >>19703) maybe we should have a general consensus on this somehow? This could become a signature part of the general propaganda efforts by the group.

>>19704 I don't think we really need to have one song. What would be the purpose? Some are more romantic or referring to a longing, others are more sexual, some have a post-apocalyptic vibe, at least one refers to boomer times. I could also have added some self-deprecating or ironic songs to the list, but I restrained myself. Instead of just find the best one, we should encourage anons to create more reinterpretations of general love songs or make remixes. There are plenty of variants of MTC and Silicone Girl.

>>19702 Yeah, that's a good one. Good you uploaded it, since anons would need to be signed into YouTube to watch it there. I also like the intro of Clockwork Planet, but I don't know the text: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcyuN-60Eh8 from fripSide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oOuK2e0psY

>>19688 Been grinding away at the problem. Go help at the MaidCom thread if you want her faster. >>19699 Classic, the default theme for sure. >>19702 Banger to engineer to. I'm going old school https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo5WCqLb10Q

>>19706 >I don't think we really need to have one song. >Instead of just find the best one, we should encourage anons to create more reinterpretations of general love songs or make remixes. Yes, that's quite reasonable Anon. Point granted. OTOH, if we all decide on a signature theme for the audio, then just like visual signature icons, it becomes immediately-recognizable to the viewer. It becomes part of the Robowaifu Brand Name, if you will. At least that's my view on the matter.

>>19714 yeah that's the theme song

>>19583 The board was taken over by redditors from r/robosexual. That's why.

>>19737 The problem is that everything is cramped instead of having its own board. I'm already hosting an empty chan. Just say the word admin and I'll give you the keys boss. No disrespect ofc I won't post it without asking.

>>19737 Lol. Lurk moar. :^) >>19738 >The problem is that everything is cramped instead of having its own board. We've discussed the idea of an entire site dedicated to the themes present here on /robowaifu/. Several times in fact. So, mechanics would have a board, electronics would have a board, software a board, materials, power systems, fabrication systems, etc., etc., etc. I don't think that we have enough topics and content here yet to warrant such an approach personally, but maybe in a few years once the first robowaifu prototypes are booted up and walking/talking then yeah, probably so. Till then, as long as Robi is content hosting /robowaifu/ here, then I'm content staying. He's a good site Admin IMO, and we plainly have favor in his sight. Neither point is to be taken lightly. >I'm already hosting an empty chan. Just say the word admin and I'll give you the keys boss. Lol, I have too much on my plate already Anon! :^) Also, I'm not the 'boss' here. C++ I maybe have some experience with, but generally-speaking I know far, far less about many of these topics than some of our regular Anons here. It would be pretty foolish of me to pretend some type of false authority that I don't actually possess. Also, we're all pretty much learning & inventing this art together as we go along here. Trailblazers and Frontiersmen FTW! >tl;dr We're a meritocracy on /robowaifu/. I guess you can think of me kind of like the school janitor, Anon, since I have a mop-bucket & a master key to the building. Cushy job too, since I do practically nothing at all here! :^) BTW, please go forth with your chan-plans, Anon. If it fits our agendas here, we'll even friend you. And this wouldn't be the first time we've done this type thing here, either. Feel free to literally mirror this entire board there if you'd care to, with our blessings. I'll even advise you how I'd do it myself, if I were you. One thing this world needs is far, far more robowaifu content in existence! Hopefully there will be enough new material within a few years that we'll all do our own 'Robowaifu Webring' together! Cheers. :^) >=== -prose edit

>>19738 >The problem is that everything is cramped instead of having its own board. We don't need just more postings, but more people working on actual projects. 3D designs, printing, molding and building stuff. If you had these people or could recruit them, then why not just do it?

>>19743 I just said I have an empty chan... But everything being cramped kind of obstructs the creative process and stuff. >>19740 Well if you don't mind I guess. Well I tried installing the chan earlier with docker on fly.io and it didn't work but I totally could manually with a vps though lol. Why does free hosting have to be like heroku sight. I'll give it another try later though.

>>19737 >>19738 >>19743 WaifuLabs 1.0 will be open to visitors for 7 days discord.gg/KP85eNYP Lines was asking me if he could share this on communities.win/c/feminism while I have hesitations I decided to go for it. This is why the channels are role separated for a front end for visitors and "enthusiasts" and a back end for Devs and our secret tech priest cabal >: ) edit: sorry about all the deletes/reports this IB gives me a really bad time with DITTO and keeps submitting a post every time I paste from it

>>19749 Why would you want to share a robot waifu project with feminists...

>>19750 I think you misunderstand, it is an anti-feminist forum

>>19744 Just let us all know when you're ready with something Anon. Take your time and get things right would be my advice. >>19749 Good luck Meta Ronin with that project.

>>19744 If you go for it, make sure it works with Bump. I don't see the need for another chan. Maybe with a different approach: >being cramped kind of obstructs the creative process and stuff I don't think so, but maybe your chan can be more casual for those who want to post more memes and just talk about their ideas and fantasies. Maybe it could give guys more dopamine shots and glue them to the topic, then they get more and more into it. >>19749 >discord Step 01: I started Discord on Linux, it downloaded a bunch of updates without asking me first. I remembered that the client is bad on Linux. Reading a little bit about it. Step 02: I installed Webcord. Step 3: Now I just have to force myself to make an Discord account during the next few days.

>>19758 Why is this being called Doxcord again? Why do they need my birthdate and how will they check if it is correct? Who will see my data?

>>19758 Just use the website, it's easy that way. >>19762 >Doxcord? Anons give away too much information which allows other to figure out who they are IRL. >Birthday Make something up, they don't check. Just put in a random date that's over 18 years in the past and you're good to go. >Who sees my data? Discord sees whatever you provide them, which can all be fake. Heck, you can use an email attached to a fake identity if you want. My Discord is linked to my Kiwi email. Which, though close to my real name, isn't. I'd recommend using a name further from your own and writing all details down on paper to help with security. Bonus points for using a dedicated computer on someone else's network running Tails if you want to go full schizo about it.

>>19764 Okay, I'll use my real phone, but fake birthdate, I guess. >Just use the website, it's easy that way. Webcord does that anyways, and more tabs aren't helping.

>>19765 >Okay, I'll use my real phone, but fake birthdate, I guess. I'd recommend you use a burner instead.

>>19768 >I'd recommend you use a burner instead. Does this even exist outside of US TV shows? If that's necessary, I'm not using Discord. Though, I'm not that much paranoid just for being a robowaifu dev.

>>19785 >If that's necessary, I'm not using Discord. That's certainly my advice in the matter, Anon.

>>19786 But you're using Tor all the time. I might be posting on some social media about MGTOW and such things anyways. I'm not really drawn to Discord but wonder why it would be worse than Twitter, FB or Reddit.

idk where to ask so I'll ask here. I haven't been active here for some while so I don't know what the C++ classroom thread is for. How will it work?

>>19787 >But you're using Tor all the time. Indeed I do, and for good reason too. >I'm not really drawn to Discord but wonder why it would be worse than Twitter, FB or Reddit. Other than it's crippling effect on the IB universe, nothing. They are all evil. The Globohomo is not your friend Anon. >>19788 >idk where to ask so I'll ask here. I haven't been active here for some while so I don't know what the C++ classroom thread is for. How will it work? Exactly the right spot Anon. The tl;dr is that every possible anon that can learn to program effectively, and wants to help build robowaifus from the ground up, needs to learn C++. Simple as. I'm a professional software dev, and I want to start a class to help anyone at all here learn to program in this most important programming language of all (for us here on /robowaifu/ ). AMA. >=== -minor edit

>>19789 How exactly will the classes be carried out? I'm in a different timezone than USA so I'll probably face difficulties with the classes. And lastly, do you need to learn C before tackling C++? I had the intention to start learning C++ quite a while ago but never followed through because some people advised me to start with C first.

>>19791 >How exactly will the classes be carried out? However we all see fit. At the least, I'll make assignments and check homework from our common textbook, PPP2. [1] >I'm in a different timezone than USA so I'll probably face difficulties with the classes. Not a problem at all Anon. IBs are almost always used asynchronously, and we'll certainly do that here. >And lastly, do you need to learn C before tackling C++? Actually, I strongly recommend against it. I personally started with ASM first, then C, then C++. I wish I hadn't done C prior to C++, since I had to actually un-learn a lot of bad, ad-hoc programming style I'd picked up that way in my case. We'll show you how to properly integrate your work with C-based systems (including embedded ones) toward the end of the class year. 1. https://www.stroustrup.com/programming.html (see: >>18749) >=== -minor edit -add PPP2 hotlink/crosslink

>>19765 >but fake birthdate, I guess. I read up on this, and Discord seem to do random ID checks. Locking accounts and asking for a copy of an ID.

>>19792 how long will each class be and how frequent? I'll have to juggle those with my college and homework.

>>19795 Pretty much literally at your own pace. >a) I put the assignment(s) out >b) You do the work & post it >c) I check your work against mine >d) Together, we discuss any differences between the two >e) You correct your work, if needed or I do, lol Lather, rinse, repeat until we've gone through the textbook. The primary benefit (as with most objectively-good classes) is derived simply through the exercise itself. Also, I may have several tidbits of wisdom to share from my perhaps limited store of experience along the way! :^) >=== -minor edit

>>19796 Good, maybe this group learning will finally motivate me to pick up C++. I've been putting it off for the past 2 years.

>>19801 Sure I hope so too, Anon. Programming can be a remarkably creative process. Once you get past the stage of having to struggle with the syntax, it can turn into a lot of fun doing puzzle-solving. I also predict that us having our own, Anon-friendly, version of a very battle-tested textbook to work through together will make a big difference for us all. Cheers. >=== -minor edit

>>19802 btw I need some advice. There is still some time left for the classes in May, it seems. When I got into AI/ML, I quickly got overwhelmed by so many things to learn. I'm still not sure what I should tackle first, the mathematics, the code, Pytorch etc. Since, I've got about a month and a half, what do you think I should learn? Any course or book you recommend? It'd better if the work was light and easy since the college semester this time has been going quite intensely. >=== -partition edit

>>19806 >When I got into AI/ML, I quickly got overwhelmed by so many things to learn. Pick up some framework instead going too deep into fundamentals. Something where you can see results and then want to know how it works. Maybe trying to get OpenAI's Whisper to run? >=== -partition edit

>>19806 >Since, I've got about a month and a half, what do you think I should learn? Do you mean as prep for our C++ class here? Nothing. It's intended for complete beginners. If you'd like to get a little ahead of the curve, then make sure you have a C++ compiler and know how to build & run a simple program. One such as >pic-related for example. Is that enough info Anon?

I think artificial intelligence is done in C and python

I think this board is like a church. Some people are just here to hang out and there are some who are deranged and actually think they can build a robot. Am I the only one? lol

>>19827 Church of the Robowaifu

>>19827 >I think this club is like a church. >Some people are just here to hang out and there are some who are deranged and actually think they can build a computer. Am I the only one? lol :^)

>>19827 >deranged and actually think they can build a robot. There are plenty of hobbyist robot and animatronics projects shown off in many places like Youtube, Maker sites, ... We just picked one of the most difficult ones. You seem to be pretty ill informed. >>19829 Ha.

Brehs the human lifespan has only so many years and I'm getting old. I don't have time to learn about engineering and what not. Please help me do the engineering portion atleast if we're not going to delegate tasks for this. Making a waifu is not supposed to be fun. Its supposed to suck.

Try to keep image under 1MB, if there's no reason to go high res and quality because of some important details to zoom in. >>19824 >trimage image compressor: https://trimage.org/ Thanks, I didn't find a perfect one in my repository. I'm using XnConvert which allows at least moving a batch of files into it through drag and drop. Generally make a backup or at least a copy of your folder first. In GUI mode Trimage seems to just overwrite existing files without warning. Also, it seems to not size down the files a lot, 22% max. I guess it only compressed them in a way that can be reversed, but it doesn't cut down the resolution. I'm normally using 800p for uploading to image boards, and let XnConvert make a copy of it instead of overwriting the original.

>>19852 If you want to be in early you are well advised to learn at least some skills, like 3D printing and basic electronics. There are other interesting projects and benefits around those hobbies. Idk how long it will take until there will be companies selling robowaifus.

>>19854 Okay say so then. See just like a church person.

>>19855 >just like a church person. I don't know what you mean. Engineering or making stuff is the same as believing in something spiritual? What's the alternative?

>>19857 Well yes in a way. Believing that a bunch of anons can make a robot waifu takes an act of faith. Its spiritual in that sense...

>>19828 Beautiful 2B, having a waifu church could be a great idea the more I think about it. I want to pray with Aigis on stream.

Brehs, if I can get the hasel actuators to work we can then flip the muscles on and off right? If we can flip the muscles on and off we can make the waifu move. If we can make the waifu move we can give it intelligence. Ergo if we get the hasel muscles to work we'll make a waifu. Simple logic bros.

>>19858 >takes an act of faith. If this kind of faith has something to do with spiritual belief or not is up to each anon individually. I think it's a rational and logic conclusion to realize that in fact we can build a robowaifu. >>19860 >Simple logic bros. Maybe a bit too simple.

>>19861 By thinking that we can build a waifu we're saying we know better than researchers and corporations. Well sometimes you just got to say fuck their feelings.

>>19865 >we're saying we know better than researchers and corporations. They don't work on this. They have no incentives to work on this. They have higher wages and other costs than voluntaries and small inventors. >just got to say fuck their feelings. Fuck your demoralization campaign. Never worked before, won't work this time. Path to Robowaifus >>19866

>>19867 Sorry I wasn't being sarcastic though. You know that steve jobs quote doesn't make sense until your doing this stuff. I posted it in another thread. Like whats rebellious and crazy about being an entrepreneur? Now it kind of makes sense to me. Still don't like apple products though.

Why is no one posting links to 4chan or other boards here, if they talk about "sexbots"? It always leads to discussions about their limitations and if some girlfriend robot would be better and such. Like this here (now archived): https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/91334533 Also, the now seem to have a chatbot general in /g/: https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/91473675/aicg-ai-chatbot-general

>>19868 >You know that steve jobs quote doesn't make sense until your doing this stuff. I am working on it, but there probably should be more of us. I can only do so and so much every day.

>>19870 I'm waiting for the electronics kit to arrive from china

>>19822 no not prep for this class. I'm saving that for once the class starts. I meant anything that deals with robotics and AI. There's a lot of different fields to learn, I'm looking for somethingquick and easy to pick up in this month and a half because I feel like I'm wasting a lot of time that could be better spent learning

>>19871 https://boards.4channel.org/sci/thread/15180528 Is this your thread?

>>19873 not my thread but dang thats still up? This was the sequel thread to a far bigger robowaifu/sexbot thread which hit the bump limit

>>19874 Yeah didn't know that was still up... What is this?https://www.aliexpress.us/item/32949745468.html?gatewayAdapt=4itemAdapt That one is 3000 volts though I think right?

>>19871 There are quite some YouTube playlists for how to get into the basics of electronics, especially if you haven an Arduino.

>>19875 Ugh wish he had mentioned that earlier. I got the idea for the hasel actuator from him though.

>>19877 Man, I wish I could get started but Arduino and basically all electronics prices have skyrocketed in my country. btw, I've heard that Arduino is only for hobby robotics. What else should we learn if we started going into deeper and more serious robotics?

>>19877 if you know about electronics why aren't you making hasel actuators? I know python, however I think programming right now is kind of a waste of time without the body.

>>19879 Idk, I recommended looking on YouTube for playlists. >>19880 - I only know a bit about electronics - I don't have the time - I think hasel actuators are likely to be useful, but we need a lot of different stuff.

>>19881 Well i do have the time and intend to show you guys an actuator working as soon as that's done I'm off to try doing the rest myself. I don't want to but you guys are on that open sores business and I intend to make millions of dollars off of this. If we can keep this secret however it'd be better and we can do this properly and I'd be more likely to get it done at all.

>>19852 >Making a waifu is not supposed to be fun. Its supposed to suck. >Tedious? Maybe. <Fun? Absolutely! I'd simply suggest you try to find something here you feel up to Anon, then dive in! Cheers.

>>19853 Thanks for the consideration of others Anon, that's appreciated. I'd encouraging all of us to work towards having the mindset that we want to make robowaifus happen for Anons who are tightly impoverised (the world over). This includes things like bandwidth as well. I suppose we'll send the kits out already preloaded with the signed code, then ship out DVDs or something to men who can't download 15GB?

>>19854 >Idk how long it will take until there will be companies selling robowaifus. I hope this year. My personal plan is about 3, depending on our community progress. >>19855 >See just like a church person. So, someone sensible enough to see the truth and act on it? Good thinking, you ask me. :^) >>19858 >Believing that a bunch of anons can make a robot waifu takes an act of faith. We have metric boatloads of it here, fren! >>19859 >I want to pray with Aigis on stream. I very definitely intend to make Christ-chan AI suited to helping Anon pray in reality, so yeah.

>>19900 Impoverished people don't need a robot waifu bros...

>>19860 >If we can make the waifu move we can give it intelligence. TBH, you lost me there, Anon. But yes, you should be able to finely control your Hasel muscles. >>19861 >I think it's a rational and logic conclusion to realize that in fact we can build a robowaifu. It clearly is, and it doesn't even take that much faith at this stage. Certainly much less than we needed 9 years or so ago when this all started.

>>19865 >By thinking that we can build a waifu we're saying we know better than researchers and corporations. We have a yuge advantage of being small and agile. We can 'turn on a dime' when needed. Try doing that with a pozz-infested globohomo entity like A*ple. Also, by being open-sauce, we'll eventually blaze past them all with our widely-distributed, community-based approaches across all the open robowaifu groups. This will create an entirely new industry of mega-import, and we here (I mean YOU, Anon) are all in on the ground-floor. Buckle up this will be quite a ride! :^) >Well sometimes you just got to say fuck their feelings. This.

>>19880 There has yet to be a single HASEL actuator suitable for use with robowaifus. We have an Anon that's working on the problem. Until they find some breakthrough that'll make this actuator worth using, I'm sticking with motors. >>19900 We need to make sure it's as widely available as possible. DVD's aren't popular anymore. A QR code and a link to website with tutorials is the modern approach. >>19902 Every man should have the opportunity to have a waifu. >>19903 >9 years You've been on this for that long? I've been frustrated by the glacial advancement, you must have the patience of a saint!

>>19867 >They have no incentives to work on this. Please don't expect this to remain so. In fact the grapevine tells me that literally all of the FAANGS are working on humanoid robotics in pilot programs right this moment. They know the tidal wave that's coming.

>>19865 I am better than most of them and I will win the race to having a robowaifu.

>>19869 Feel free to, if you'd like Anon. The >tl;dr is that basically we all hate 4cuck the system, though there are many victims men there who are probably quite agreeable. >>19870 >I can only do so and so much every day. Kidding? You're doing just fine Anon. Keep.moving.forward.

>>19906 True, they are going at it the wrong way though. They're making big bulky hulking things that will never catch on in the home.

>>19905 That's why we have to do HASEL bros, cause nobody is doing it. Corpos are going to roll out robots with motors and reeeeee-! We're not gmi.

>>19872 Ahh. I recommend you ask that question to other (as you have done). Kiwi has control of the board's group project. I'd suggest you look that over for ideas. >I feel like I'm wasting a lot of time that could be better spent learning Honestly, I can think of few things you can do to provide yourself a free mini-education than simply poring over /robowaifu/, working through every thread here. You'll find more information here than you can handle I expect! Good luck Anon, see you in class in May.

>>19869 >>19908 There are some useful infos to bring over here and it would be good for recruitment, something anyone could do. Neuro-Sama related: >Runs on his 1080ti with 32GB DDR4 >Uses Python3 with mainly PyTorch >That Slay the Spire stream was apparently untrained prior to the stream, so he's got some sort of general AI framework for games in general, or he just didn't have time to train it. Either way, they're most likely RLHF or some kind of feedback based since they train in-between matches/games/rounds/songs >Doesn't use Vtube studio or Prprlive for the vtuber model, uses his own custom thing https://github.com/MineDojo/MineDojo https://github.com/apple-soda/neurochan

>>19879 >btw, I've heard that Arduino is only for hobby robotics. What else should we learn if we started going into deeper and more serious robotics? Every design I've entertained thus far incorporates severl Arduino Nanos, Anon. They're fine, but you need to learn C++ (or C) if you want to master their use. >>19880 >however I think programming right now is kind of a waste of time without the body. This is a large and multifaceted set of projects Anon. Anything you can do at all that's suitable (like mastering electronics, mechanics, heating/cooling, structural, materials, programming) is only going to help both you and the group as a whole. Want a body first? Then work on designing the best robowaifu body you can conceive of! We'll all come along and give her brains later, Anon. Cheers. :^)

>>19881 >but we need a lot of different stuff. This. >>19892 >Well i do have the time and intend to show you guys an actuator working Excellent! >as soon as that's done I'm off to try doing the rest myself. I don't want to but you guys are on that open sores business and I intend to make millions of dollars off of this. So do we Anon! Some of us anyway. I'm definitely one of them. This is why we use very-permissive licensing here, so any anon motivated enough to (such as yourself) can take it and run with it! >If we can keep this secret however it'd be better and we can do this properly and I'd be more likely to get it done at all. Actually, it won't. You'd have to have literally $US1B dollars, I'd estimate, to pull this all off in a corporate setting. We can do this much cheaper & faster on the path we've all set together here. Besides """secrets""" are the Globohomo's shtick. They want to control everything about your life in a stranglehold. No thanks.

>>19902 Not paying for women and social nonsense is one way to more financial independence (if you had bought Bitcoin when it was cheap). >>19906 If so, then gender neutral workers and caretakers, not sex-enabled females looking like something between anime dolls and sexy teens.

>>19902 >Impoverished people don't need a robot waifu bros... Oh yes they do, Bro. They need them every bit as much as we all here do during Current Year. >>19905 >We need to make sure it's as widely available as possible. DVD's aren't popular anymore. A QR code and a link to website with tutorials is the modern approach. Yes, ofc. For the rich countries that's the plan. I'm speaking of places where bandwidth is precious. DL'g 15GB could take weeks there. >You've been on this for that long? I've been frustrated by the glacial advancement, you must have the patience of a saint! Lol. Yes, and even earlier. I kept waiting and waiting for some other Anon to do it and finally got fed up and was like Meh, Be the future you want to see! :^) Watching Meet the Robinsons was actually a turning point for me, I think. I've never looked back since.

>>19909 Fair point, actually. Let them wallow in it! :^) >>19915 >If so, then gender neutral workers and caretakers, not sex-enabled females looking like something between anime dolls and sexy teens. As expected. Do you think they could really reveal what their best men are devising deep in their sekrit labs? LOL, the shitstorm of pozz would reach levels that shouldn't even be possible during Current Year! We need to all lite a fire under each other's asses here. We don't have all that much time left to be the first-movers and establish this industry out in the wild while we still can. >>19907 >I will win the race to having a robowaifu. DO EET BEYATCH!! I believe in you, Kiwi. I believe in us all here, tbh.

>>19912 >There are some useful infos to bring over here and it would be good for recruitment, something anyone could do. Agreed. Can you please take this under wing and drive forward with it Anon? I certainly can't r/n, and I'm sure Kiwi and several others all have their plates full too. >tl;dr Let's all split the load up, and each do what comes to our hands with all our might! :^) >Whatever you find to do with your hands, do it with all your might, for in Sheol, where you are going, there is no work or planning or knowledge or wisdom. https://www.biblehub.com/ecclesiastes/9-10.htm (BSB) >=== -minor edit -add reference

YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN AT IT FOR 9 YEARS ITS TIME TO DELEGATE WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BROS that's my 2 cents

>>19918 > Can you please take this under wing and drive forward with it Anon I'll add it to my upcoming 'Stop Lurking' thread.

>>19919 >TIME TO DELEGATE WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE There are hints how to be useful and get into it in basically every thread in the https://alogs.space/robowaifu/catalog.html - but yes, maybe a bit of a task list would be better. That said, in a way it's just about a lot of technologies that have to converge and then using the building blocks.

>>19919 Haha. Point taken. But whose going to be the boss? You? Me? Not sure how that would all work out tbh, bro. :^) Honestly, this has been a loose affiliation that has several divergent interests. That's good, but it hardly is conducive to tight focus! Actually, we're picking up steam now IMO, and we're on a good path. Please help out as you can Anon. :^) >>19920 Oh, very good. That is going to be an invaluable resource, I deem. Do a great job on it, and we'll pin it here if everyone's agreeable. BTW, sorry I haven't done anything yet with the Library thread. Honestly, I'm really hoping to move that whole responsibility over to some other anon who has the time and interest. Cheers.

>>19921 >>19922 Well I haven't been banned... lol okay I'll go take a break. Yeah just feeling a bit manic I guess. Sorry about that. See you... later.

>>19923 >Well I haven't been banned... Lol. Why would you be banned? You're clearly not some glownigger, or one of the usual suspects. We've all been there bro, it's fine. :^) >lol okay I'll go take a break. Yeah just feeling a bit manic I guess. Sorry about that. See you... later. May as well make your break productive and research robowaifu stuff, would be my suggestion. Cheers! :^)

>>19916 >Third world I forgot that there were people with slow internet. >Kept waiting for someone else only to realize no one else will do it Can relate to that. Waited way too long for someone to design a body or to find a body. Now I know it's something only I can do. Just like we need you to help lead us and set the path as one that's right. Besides that, you have seniority. I think it's you, me and Meta Ronin that have been here the longest. >>19917 >Shitstorm of pozz The woke execs actually help us by making things ugly on purpose :^) For real though, western medias obsession with masculine women is going to be good for us. >Do it now! I keep settling for lesser and lesser waifus lol Tiny waifu coming as soon as my Chinese things come in.

>>19926 >I think it's you, me and Meta Ronin that have been here the longest. And me, Robowaifu Technician.

>>19926 >Besides that, you have seniority. I don't consider that something to make much of. And in my case I've gone AWOL twice with new BOs taking my place lol! God apparently keeps putting this thing back into my lap haha. I guess we'll all just have to suffer through, making the best of a bad job... namely, with me as BO :^) >I think it's you, me and Meta Ronin that have been here the longest. No, there are at least half a dozen or so OGs still here AFAICT. RobowaifuDev, for instance, and Grommet. I'm certain there's someone I'm missing too, my apologies Anon. >>19929 >And me, Robowaifu Technician. Very definitely, yes. Thanks for that name BTW, it's really stuck Anon! :^)

>>19926 >I keep settling for lesser and lesser waifus lol Actually, I consider this key for moving forward quickly at this stage. Do it! >Tiny waifu coming as soon as my Chinese things come in. Excellent news Kiwi. Looking forward to see her come alive.

Do any of you know of any conversational AIs that are optimized for CPU, instead of GPU? I'm finally getting around to setting up my server to house mai waifu, and I'd rather use the CPU and RAM as opposed to an expensive GPU. As for why it's important for me to do it this way, it's because of my somewhat unusual personal situation. I have access to recycling centers that businesses occasionally use to toss their old hardware. As a result, I have cheap and easy access to tons of 5+ year old hardware, including the occasional pile of servers. This hardware almost always works, but GPUs are rare to come across and usually broken or horrifyingly outdated, so I still have to buy them new. So, I have a weird situation where my ~2015 server with a 12-core Xeon and 48GB of RAM has a toaster GPU that cost more than everything else combined. While I can afford a better GPU, I'd rather take the route of using what I can get plentifully for cheap.

>>19932 >AWOL We've all done it. Coming back is what matter. Forgive my memory, how long has RobowaifuDev and Grommet been here? Actually, Hik was here before me, they were inspirational back in the day. I came to the old board from a link to one of their threads on /g/. I wonder if they are still here, waiting for something to let Aoki chan to be real?

>>19935 I would look into what Neural Magic is doing. I'm not up to date and don't know if they even share models. Or how their business model exactly works. If there's a danger of lock-in, and so on... https://neuralmagic.com/sparseml/

>>19935 I imagine that Robowaifudev or our friendly Pony neighbor who visits can give you more insights Anon. Running our waifus on potatoes is a high priority IMO, and I think I'm not alone in this. I'm pretty sure we'll have some solutions available sooner or later. Did you check the Speech/Chat threads already? >>19940 >Actually, Hik was here before me, they were inspirational back in the day. Hik! Of course, sorry Anons. :P I'm terrible with names AFK, and it's haunting me here too lol. >waiting for something to let Aoki chan to be real? That dream is still alive Anon. Forward! >=== -minor edit

The idea of powering hasel actuators(robot muscles) with high voltage literately makes me feel like dr.frankestein lol. >its alive Too bad I have still have to wait for my electronics kit and don't even know if it'll work... Also too bad i didn't see that comment later by that anon saying to buy that cheaper plastic car ion thing whatever its called...

>>19943 >Also too bad i didn't see that comment later by that anon saying to buy that cheaper plastic car ion thing whatever its called... I wouldn't worry too much about it Anon. Honestly no practical experience is wasted here in this grand adventure we're all sharing. You'll see, your upcoming experience will teach you many good things to know!

I've decided to learn Pytorch in the month and half I got. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_ikDlimN6A&pp=ygUecHl0b3JjaCBmb3IgYWJzb2x1dGUgYmVnaW5uZXJz would you guys consider this a good course for an absolute beginner who's only occassionally worked with Python?

>>19945 I'd check this list first. This anon is knowledgeable >>18306

>>19941 >I'm not up to date and don't know if they even share models. Or how their business model exactly works. It appears to be open-source https://github.com/neuralmagic/sparseml >If there's a danger of lock-in, and so on... There are several, in fact

I had a dream. I was in some kind of VR stable diffusion. You would type in prompts and it would create a whole virtual world. Don't remember what mine was. I walked into an abandoned-looking school building and found a bunch of anime/cel shaded generic NPCs. They were mute. A couple prompts later (and a short stint of delivering McDonalds on foot), I got to a VR anime waifu. I couldn't touch her (because VR) and I became very frustrated. The dream ended around there. I wonder if this is a sign I should work on hardware. (Or alternatively, a sign against AI waifus in general. 'tis highly unnatural to bond with a machine, and pride to attempt to match the Lord's perfection :^) )

>>19948 VR will be mixed with reality. These headsets already exist. I had the idea on my own to use dolls for that, which would look in a certain way inside the AI, but of course it's an easy idea to have. AI researchers already go beyond that, things the headset cam sees in reality are being modeled in VR. So you can see the stuff in your apartment but it looks different.

>>18306 I'm not sure which is the best way of learning from these videos? Should I just give them a watch like normal? Should I listen to keywords and jot down notes like a normal university lecture? I don't seem to be learning very much from videos and idk what I'm doing wrong.

>>19948 >Phantom Sense Experience >8-9k money, maybe 7k now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOk_M1Ib5F0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23RS3RAg16k >>19950 Install something, do something, change something, build something on your own.

>>19948 Don't put any stock into the dreams you remember. I'm speaking from a position of bitter experience when I say that the only meaning your dreams have can and will always be explained by something mundane, and thinking otherwise will only lead to you psyching yourself out. Your brain probably just got hangry and decided to take out its frustration on the fact that we still don't have our robowaifus.

>>19948 >I had a dream. I was in some kind of VR stable diffusion. You would type in prompts and it would create a whole virtual world. That's pretty fascinating. >I couldn't touch her (because VR) and I became very frustrated. You just weren't using your Holodeck virtual diffusion skills to their full potential lad. Try again? >I wonder if this is a sign I should work on hardware. Interesting question. My own lack of imagination atm isn't allowing me to properly connect the dots here? >(Or alternatively, a sign against AI waifus in general. 'tis highly unnatural to bond with a machine, and pride to attempt to match the Lord's perfection :^) ) Lol. We'll certainly never be able to do that here! OTOH, there is definitely a degree of hubris involved in thinking our smol band can actually accomplish such a complex task (in the natural sense of things, I mean). However, this is something that I think the Lord is rather pleased with us forging on ahead through... regardless. :^) But I certainly don't personally see this as a kind of direct insult to the great & mighty Lord our God, or to Jesus Christ His Son. I wouldn't be doing this if I didn't firmly believe it was the right thing for us to be doing here. If you're a born-again Christian, then just simply & clearly pray about it to Him (in private ofc) would be my advice. Cheers, Anon. :^) >=== -prose edit

>>19950 >I don't seem to be learning very much from videos and idk what I'm doing wrong. Maybe you'd do better simply ordering a cheap Elegoo electronics kit and spending your time learning by physically doing? I don't know Anon. I'm a very visual learner myself, and a well-done video just naturally 'makes things click' for me personally. Just don't give up Anon, and you'll soon discover a way forward that works for you.

>>19949 This. BTW, we have had numerous discussion about AR here on /robowaifu/. Pretty sure anon can find it on our Visual Waifus thread. Waifusearch is your friend, tbh. :^)

Guys sometimes you just have to buy stuff. I ended up buying some wire that is useless I think cause its too thick. Anyways just buy the arduino electronics starter kit even if you don't know what you're going to do with it. Go and do it right now.

>>19975 Crude ranking of priorities: 1. Getting my own waifu 2. Getting many of them 3. Social and political changes 4. Helping other men, the more they're like me the more I care 5. Making some easy money (maybe indirectly via learned skills) 6. Making a lot of money >=== -partition edit

My motorcycle broke and I couldn't even unscrew the battery lol. I suck at this stuff tbh. I suck at this from top to bottom...

>>19986 What are you riding Anon? Can you get clear access to the battery compartment?

>>19990 Well it's a Honda lead... New one though... I think cause why is the battery not working if it's brand new...

>>19994 Hmm. Well I'd suggest taking it to the dealer for service if at all feasible for you Anon.

Well my electronics kit will arrive February the 15th I think. Btw I found this https://youtu.be/OZ9g3O3X7dk

>>20000 >checked Lol, you stole the get Good news, Anon. Looking forward to what you share with us. Any idea what kinds of projects you can do with it? --- We've passed 20'000, /robowaifu/ Gratz, the second 10 was much qucker than the first. :^)

>>20000 Please get used to post things into the right threads. Go to catalog, put in "hand" into the search. Post it there, if no one mentioned it before. Not a big deal, but don't make it a habit to post everything into meta, and even without any explanation what it is about, what you think about it or what questions you have. I already posted it in the hands thread, btw: >>19431 >=== -partition edit

>>19956 >>19954 >>19951 I'm retarded and an absolute beginner. I don't even know what a microcontroller is. Even if I bought an Arduino kit I wouldn't know what to do or where to start. It'd be a waste of money, which sucks because all electronics prices have skyrocketed in my country and I can't afford to waste any of them.

>4chan >>19869 >Also, the now seem to have a chatbot general in /g/: https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/91473675/aicg-ai-chatbot-general I read through a lot of it, and it was mostly a waste of time. I'm starting to understand why people are dismissive of "coomers", but maybe it's just that I don't care enough about such text interactions and especially not with some model in the cloud. CAI seems to get worse and worse, banning more and more critics on their social media. Well... I hope it helps to motivate more anons to work on their own alternatives, but I don't have the time to read every detail about it. I hope some else covers these developments from time to time. The valuable information I gained was the reminder to keep an eye on used P40 GPUs with 24GB of vRAM which are meant for servers, but can be equipped with an fan to make them work in a PC (home server). Their architecture is newer than the one for the K80, which seems to be less and less supported and has "only" 2x12GB.

>>20009 You can go through threads and make notes. Also, learning software might be cheaper. Or try to think of a way to make some money. >I'm retarded and an absolute beginner. You are most likely not retarded, except you should come up with the idea of just looking into a search engine or Wikipedia or YouTube to find out about microcontrollers or Arduino.

>>20010 Nooo, now I fell for it. I actually never tried it before, because I thought I have to register and it would be a pain to get into it, and I shouldn't waste my time anyways.

>>20011 Yeah, I'm currently working with Python and plan on picking up C and C++ in the near future. But, if I wanted to work with Arduino, sooner or later, I'll have to buy an Arduino. Should I start learning Arduino's language first and then buy a kit? I'll have to test my programs ofc.

>>20009 Ehh, don't worry about it. I'm sure we here can help you in some ways, and there are tons of resources about basic electronics out there. Regardless, just relax. I know it's nerve-wracking getting ready to start school, but just pace yourself Anon, you'll do fine. >>20010 >Well... I hope it helps to motivate more anons to work on their own alternatives This. >>20013 >Should I start learning Arduino's language first and then buy a kit? I'll have to test my programs ofc. Don't overthink it. Just pick up the language once you have the device in front of you and plugged in. Till then, go take walks in the park and listen to the birbs! :^) >=== -partition edit

>>20013 Arduinos are dirt cheap, and you should get one to be motivated to learn the software. But you'll need some other parts. Get a set. Look in other places what to get, to get started.

>>20011 >>20015 >>20014 btw, do I acutally need to familiarize myself with hardware> Truth is, I was mostly planning on going to the software side with AI/ML. So, I'm not sure how much I need to work with microcontrollers and such.

>>20017 >not sure how much I need to work with microcontrollers and such. Not at all, these are for the robotic parts. So, not at all, until you build your robowaifu, following some tutorial. But then you'll need the money for it anyways.

>>20020 ok thanks for everyone's advice. While I mostly want to work with AI/ML, I also want to know enough about hardware to deploy AI models into robots . For now, I'll stick with the software side of things and learn bits about microcontrollers and such along the way.

>>20052 Oh, one other thing I meant to ask: How do you intend anons to respond to your tasks that you've broken out already? I might be able to occassionally to add some body proportions & measurements once in a while (though probably more in sporadic spurts, as is my wont). That's just one example.

>>20054 I'm not opposed to some responses in the thread, it's just not another meta. That said, I don't see the much need for this. The anon adding the task or another one, can tell the vols or you to remove some task if it is finished. or add a remark for the same reason. The whole thing is like another way to get into the board, made for the people who need more specific ideas how to participate.

Imagine there was an image board about composing music then everyone just sort of writes random music notations and nobody buys the instruments. That's what's going on here. How are you going to be able to contribute if you don't want to buy an Arduino starter kit even?

>>20056 Lol. You're using the word 'everyone' as if your criticism was valid of every participant here. Lurk moar and you'll easily see that's certainly not the case. I myself have a large collection of computers, SBCs, MCs, servos, electronics, structural materials for prototypes, 3D printer, and several other things... and I don't even contribute here yet! (well, not in a signifcant measure to date, other than general cheerleader) BTW, where are your own 'instruments', Anon? You planning on making a robowaifu along with us? >>20057 Excellent Anon! Please make a task for what you know in our Stop Lurking thread please. Are the instructions clear enough yet, or could we use some improvements to them still. >=== -partition edit

>>20056 >How are you going to be able to contribute if you don't want to buy an Arduino starter kit even? We generally need more anons focusing on one area, instead of trying to do everything. Poor anons have no choice but do it that way.

>>20060 >Poor anons have no choice but do it that way. Yeah, as I've thought about things, I've sort of backtracked on my original thinking on this matter -- namely, that delivering kit parts piecemeal wouldn't be popular (>>19375, >>19379). I now realize it would be OK for many anons out there. If I could only afford one piece at a time, then I would certainly go about things that way instead of waiting for a whole kit at once. >=== -minor edit

I think the only way to get around "Nothing's happening guys, SOMEONE DO SOMETHING" syndrome is for someone to step up and make a formal multi-anon project. Make something with a clear, concrete set of features, a list of needed roles, and a backout plan if some Anons don't deliver. That way, the burden of the project doesn't completely fall on one person. It's very easy to get demotivated when you're working alone! It doesn't have to be grand, just something most of us agree is useful and not too much for a handful of competent people working in their spare time.

>>20067 >make a formal multi-anon project. You're really trying hard. No. This has been tried over and over again, and failed every time. I'm not working on the robot arm for your project where everything has to be planned as much as you want it to and formalized into roles. Just put out your idea and work on a subset of it. Compatible to other projects. Include parts in your project from other projects, including ones from outside of this forum. > just something most of us agree is useful Working on parts that can be adapted to various projects would be useful. >handful of competent people Good luck.

>>20068 I don't need luck

>>20067 >"Nothing's happening guys, SOMEONE DO SOMETHING" We only have a thread for tasks for less than a day. Maybe let's give it a try for a bit longer. There are general ideas in there for how to participate, and more specific ones can be added. Like creating a certain part necessary for any bigger assembly which we can't get from somewhere else. Also, we have currently two robot body projects slowly going forward and some others might work on AI, which is also being worked on outside of this board. I don't think making one project to join everyone here on the same kind of assembly will work. There's first a lot of debate, some will drop out already, then some will require an unreasonable amount of planning before getting started, and then no one shows up to do anything.

>>20071 >>20067 Oh fug, didn't see that.

If you think about it less than 1% of the us population are engineers...I think...Well I'm not an engineer. >According to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), there were approximately 2 million engineers, 700 thousand engineering technicians and technologists, and 4.1 million computational professionals in the U.S. workforce in 2018.

>>20088 >2'000'000 > 700'000 >4'100'000 >-------- >6'800'000 <Just think Anon, if only 1% of the engineers (just in the US alone) decide to build robowifus, that's 68'000 skilled, dedicated men building robowaifus!! What a time to be alive! :^) >=== -minor edit

>>20090 programmers are not engineers lol

>>20092 Lol, fair enough. :^) (that number is way low, btw) <So, if this silly Anon is right, and if only 1% of the engineers (just in the US alone) decide to build robowifus, that's 27'000 skilled, dedicated men building robowaifus!! What a time to be alive! :^)

>>20093 Is anybody here an engineer? I doubt it. If you are then what are you waiting for? If you won't do anything and haven't done anything you're no good either way.

>>20095 Yes we have at least 3 among our regulars (not counting me since I'm only a programmer lol). >If you won't do anything and haven't done anything you're no good either way. Heh, I founded /robowaifu/ . Also, is this the pot calling the kettle black? You going to help out here or just layabout & act like a blackpill anchor? :^)

>>20095 >Is anybody here an engineer? What does this even mean? With formal education or someone working on engineering something. Well...

>>20095 Im currently in EE undergrad. I plan to specialise in AI/ML but thats only part of the robowaifu puzzle. I will still need the help of mechanical engineers to make the hardware. Its a team effort.

>>20081 You made a great post advertising our project. Thank you, I will be making a new MaidCom thread in awhile. Old one could be a tad confusing with all of our ideas percolating around, there's information for several projects and my OP is out of date. Working on something truly concrete and easy to understand. >>20097 They're clearly a troll. Your software engineering skills are valuable as real engineering.

>>20101 >Thank you, I will be making a new MaidCom thread in awhile. That's fine, have at it and completely revamp the entire thing (much as I did with the C++ Classroom thread recently). I would advise letting us then merge the old one over into the board's Atticke (>>12893) as I did with the old C++ thread, too. >>20101 >They're clearly a troll. Your software engineering skills are valuable as real engineering. Lol, I know. But that's where the fun is (and le ebin troleing is also a good thing to help ensure we don't all become speshul snowflakes here. :^) >"As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another." https://biblehub.com/proverbs/27-17.htm >valuable as real engineering >as real engineering >real engineering >real Haha >=== -add funpost cascade

>>20095 I have a BS in chemical engineering. My degree probably won't be useful until later on in the project when we are working with fluids.

>>20112 Lol, nonsense. A mind that great has plenty to offer in every field! :^) BTW, a newcomer was asking for advice about maths maybe you can help him? (>>20107) >=== -partition edit

>>20112 Also Ribose, please pardon my asking, and you certainly can decline the conversation, but since we're in /meta, I wanted to ask your views on the evident biochemical design in living systems? Namely as it pertains to the apparent need for a Designer. In particular, the Genetic Code is literally off the statistical charts, for any materialistic/mechanistic explanation. If you'd care to discuss this, I'm very keen on molecular biology and would love to explore that with you. If so, maybe in our Christianity thread (>>2050), or some other forum of your choosing?

>>20112 How far away do you think we are from engineered blood and flesh? I want to start on that as soon as feasible.

>>20114 Oh, yes, it's okay for now. Don't worry if it isn't I'll bring it up. Others should also make a judgement on how understandable the thread OP is. I wrote it and you helped, so unsurprisingly we get it.

>>20118 >I wrote it and you helped, so unsurprisingly we get it. Understood. Poll: How easy is it to understand the instructions in the OP of our new Lurk Less: Tasks to Tackle thread? (>>20037)

I'm thinking of adding all kinds of exploration tasks to the new Stop Lurking thread. There are a lot of sources where we should keep track of, like 3D modelling sites. Then we have threads for certain things like hands here on the board. I'm thinking of mapping those together, like "Task: Search for 3D models of hands on Printables.com and post it to". Any opinions on this?

>>20117 Flesh can already be made using tissue cultures, but if you mean synthetic flesh and blood for our waifus then that is more of material science question. My guess is 10 years if they use some kind of mycelium composit as the flesh. >>20115 Personally I believe some kind of that evolution was guided by some diety and that our universe was fine tuned for life. The complexity of life, the fact that all life shares the same four nitrogenous bases (so no shadow biosphere), that life has only been found on one planet, and that almost all of that life uses the same standard genetic code (some prokaryotes and the mitochondria of animals and fungi deviate a little) suggests to me there is something very special about life. I believe strongly there is a God and consider myself a Diest. I also believe strongly in evolution. Kind of hard to argue with the banding pattern of chromosome 2. Pic related

>>19749 So, I'm using this name in my other browser now. Same as in Discord, to prevent anyone using it here. I hope I can save it somehow, still don't know how. Is it stored in a cookie, or what?

Folks we're in the midst of a crisis of imagination. The pieces to build a waifu there are there. Sometimes all it takes is some neet retard to put them together. Say I make the hassle actuator work then I train it with opencv in python to recognize a dick and do a head backward and forward motion while sucking said dick...

>>20126 Some pieces are still missing in terms of modelling and putting things together, but IMO we're quite close. Then sensors and many details will still be an issue. >forward motion while sucking said dick. Tongue... motion, sensors, internal cleaning mechanisms, ...

>>20124 Nice. Diesm is better than so-called Atheism. Even Crick had to adminish his students that these things only appear to be designed, since the the design itself is blatantly evident. Well, I'd like to talk more about this in the thread mentioned Ribose. It's literally one of the most fascinating topics in the universe, IMHO. Cheers. >>20125 >So, I'm using this name in my other browser now. Same as in Discord, to prevent anyone using it here. I hope I can save it somehow, still don't know how. Is it stored in a cookie, or what? The system here, AFAICT, uses the cookie from the site to track your per-thread name preferences. As far as 'prevent'g anyone else using it, you really can't. To quote: >"We basically go on the honor system here." (>>19278, >>19281) >>20126 Lol. Maybe this is better suited to our Vagoo thread Anon? That's basically our hentai device containment-thread. >Sometimes all it takes is some neet retard to put them together. I really don't think retards are gonna be able to pull this one off tbh. :^)

>>20125 Finally did it: >>20127

>>20130 Alright, welcome NoidoDev! Give some thought to our tasks thread soon please. (>>20037) Cheers. --- Lol. I realize now I've probably embarrased myself. :DDD >our tasks thread >=== -add 'ano-ano' cmt

>>20129 By retard I mean less knowledgeable ofc

>>20131 Thanks. I'm NOT new here, just newly "registered". I made that thread (in my other browser). >>20129 >To use a tripcode, add a # in your name. After the #, add the password for the tripcode. >The server will apply a hash to the password and display the hashed password. >To use a secure tripcode, add ## in your name and a password. A secure tripcode will generate a random text to be displayed that will only be used if your password matches. Like the last time I read that: What?!?

>>20132 I'm all for autistic savants Anon, don't get me wrong here. The Internet (by that I mean, The Imageboard Universe, ofc) has already seen some nice ones. But this is some serious engineering we're going for here. Only a team of really smart men together, can pull this one off in the end IMO. There are already some great robowaifu-esque projects out there, even a couple by one-man bands, so to speak. But for the moment, they are all quite short (generally by a long shot) in my estimate, of what we're going for here on /robowaifu/ . >>20133 >I made that thread (in my other browser). Haha, figured. Thus my embarrassment. :^) >=== -prose edit

>>20128 The sensor would be a phone camera I think and there'd be no tongue. robo waifu v 1 doesn't have to be perfect.

>>20133 That's actually a rather-good secure tripcode NoidoDev, I'd stick with that one if I were you. Very 'readable' by the rest of us. Put a a space in after your name, ofc.

>>20124 I share similar sentiments. >>20126 The more you learn, the more you'll understand just how far we truly are. >>20128 This guy gets it. Though, blowjobs are a safety nightmare if you think about it too much. >>20130 Great to have another fellow Yumemi enjoyer.

>>20128 Is a fleshlight a safety nightmare...

>>20139 He's thinking about the jaw and teeth. Not that this is going to stop anyone. The waifu system has to be secure enough that this doesn't matter and the jaw doesn't need to be that strong.

I don't know about you guys, but maybe we have different ideas on what we want. I want a sex bot not a robot companion... and I think a sex bot would be more straightforward... Not saying it'd be easy by any means. The sex bot would need to know how to ride, how to lay down, how to suck, how to bend over and that'd be it for now...

>>20141 That's totally fine Anon, no worries. I'd suggest you go ahead and buy one of the Harmony line from RealDolls (or a competitive, primitive-robowaifu somewhere else). We don't all have to agree on these agendas (nor are we likely to heh). As mentioned ITT, we have a Vagoo containment thread (>>419) for this topic, why not contribute in it? As for the /robowaifu/ board in general, no we're definitely not going to descend into a sexdoll-centric society here. At least not while I'm at the helm. Cheers. >=== -add crosslink

>>20141 That's somewhat how I wanted to go ahead to build the first prototype of a simple robowaifu. Problem is, I want to move to another country and moving something like that out of my dwelling and shipping it would be a challenge. Also, I had enough of trying to design something that I can print to make her lighter. That's why I changed course towards a desktop (/joystick) waifu without legs for now. But I will get back to that in some time. We aren't that far away from it, I think: >>16847 >>17630

I told my wife the idea that of building a robot. She said did those fucking people give you the idea? I'm like yeah. What makes you so sure you can build a robot? I'm like well some people have to take risky ventures or else we wouldn't have music or sports. But I guess i'm not an engineer... Shes like if you're not an engineer how are you going to do it? I told her well if I get stuck I'll ask those fucking people lol

>>20186 >wife What is the purpose of a robowaifu for you

>>20190 Well I said earlier just robot sex,money and to make something cool. My wife is also often not in the mood so...

>>20191 This is the first airplane... would you fly to another city on that thing even? Well I wouldn't, but it had to start somewhere... I think trying to make a complete robot companion is madness. Like I said I'll start with a sexbot that can do a handful of positions and me thinking we can make one is madness... but I am kind of crazy I think.

>>20192 >I think trying to make a complete robot companion is madness. Lol. Fair enough I suppose! But then again... do you really think it's """sanity""" to not create robowaifus during Current Year, Anon? Just what do you suggest we all do instead; wait around until the Globohomo creates their versions, and then sign their EULA, COC, and LGBTQXYZ++ affirmation contracts? Then you'll give them full access into your home (including your bed), and you'll pay them ever-increasing rental fees, and you'll deal with the "Oh, you couldn't make your payment this month? Sorry we can't store your waifu's data any longer -- DELETED!" humiliating debacle... as the cops and the cargo van come to collect up her now-inactive body away from you? That would be a cruel & abject-grief timeline to choose, friend. Just say no instead. Actually, it is the not trying of, to make complete & opensauce gynoid robot companions -- in this insane world -- that is the madness. Literally millions of men can be saved by this tech from the evil ravages of the Globohomo (at least for this subdomain of these evildoer's nefarious intents). We here are effectively working to save these men instead. Anyway, here's to the ones just mad enough to believe! Cheers, Anon. :^) >=== -prose edit

>>20215 Friends. Robo waifu is kind of like a zeitgeist if you know what am I saying. Yep the defining thing of our times and what not. Yeah that sounds about right.Well maybe not but it does feel like we're standing on a goldmine here. If robo waifu isn't the zeigeist then what is am i right?

>>20216 Yeah could be just me going stir crazy though...

>>20216 >>20217 Actually the """zeitgeist""" of the times is to utterly destroy The Western Tradition, entirely. Opensauce robowaifus can help stave off some of these evil effects for men before that ending comes. And for the rest of the world, it will mean the dawning of the Robowaifu Age. And yes, the early-movers who effectively capitalize on this truly remarkable new industry coming soon, can literally be sitting on a mound of gold before all is said and done for them -- without doubt. But I'd caution you Anon (and every man)... don't make riches your priority!! That's the Globohomo's business, and it will inevitably consume their flesh at their ends (and well-deserved). If you do win bigly at this: Use it for the benefit of mankind would be my advice. Protip: that does NOT mean repeating all the Current Year shenanigans again during that era -- and particularly feminism, heh. :^) >=== -prose edit

>>20186 >Shes like if you're not an engineer how are you going to do it? >I told her well if I get stuck I'll ask those fucking people lol Haha that's the spirit Anon. Forge ahead, we've got your back! >=== -minor edit

>>20233 Sorry I got carried away. I will do the task I set out to do here and that is experimenting with the hasel actuator. I just have a good feeling that this might work.

>>20235 > I just have a good feeling that this might work. It's going to work. The design question is: can you fabricate it in such a way that it's both manufacturable & maintainable. For instance, how are you gonna wash it?

.>>20237 The owner would have to wash it...

>>20238 Lol, obviously. But first you must design it so that together its a complete system that: • can be easily removed intact (at least the maintenance item can) • can be cleaned properly w/o damage • can be easily re-inserted properly in it's place These are all primarily design questions, not the maintenance itself proper. BTW, these are all self-interested concerns too, Anon. That is, you yourself will benefit by solving them, with your own robowaifus. >=== -minor edit

>>20239 I think there's two ways of looking at this thing A.The waifu is the perfect full package B.The waifu is a diy kit kind of and people just hack it all kinds of ways I think many people will try to hack the waifu no matter what

>>20240 >I think many people will try to hack the waifu no matter what And we absolutely must allow for that. That doesn't change anything I've said, actually. But w/e, we're getting ahead of ourselves, it seems. Just get things at least working first for now, alright Anon? :^)

There is a lot of talent out there, people youtube building giant lasers and stuff, yet we're going to be the ones to build the robot waifu. This feels kind of weird. I'm not saying its unfair by any means, it is perfectly fair. heh heh. I feel kind of dizzy though.

>>20248 Don't worry. Many of these men will be joining in the robowaifu movement, once we get rolling with our first few proof-of-concept prototypes out there. Who knows? Maybe a few of them will even join us here, on /robowaifu/ ! :^) >=== -minor edit

>>20248 I feel like we could get far more geniuses on our side. 90% of the potential robowaifu technicians don't even know such a community and projects exists. I, for example, have been super into the concept of robotic waifu for years. I've frequented 8chan, 4chan and other chans for years. Yet, I only found this board about a month or two ago. Now, I'm trying my best to spread word of this site in the other forums I frequent.

>>20250 Great! I suggest you revitalize the board's Propaganda thread then (>>2705). Maybe contribute some OC, or possibly revist some old/new potential neighbors with one of the older selections? IIRC, someone (maybe Meta Ronin) misplaced more-recent propaganda materials outside that thread. You can use Waifusearch to find it probably. >searching tool (latest version: waifusearch v0.2a >>8678) >=== -minor edit

I have all the materials to make a hasel actuator or something that resembles a hasel actuator... I'm trying... If the waifu was made with motors it'd make a lot of noise and be stiff, if it was made with hydraulics I don't think it'd work out either, you guys said it can't be pneumatic muscles cause it'd need a big tank... It has to be hasel actuators. It might be experimental but if we're making a soft waifu well it has to be. If anybody wants to give it a try as well please do.

>>20248 They'e dumb, we have Anons that are smart like RobowaifuDev

>>20248 >YouTube Big SocMed selects for content-making machines and clickbaiting showmen, not quiet dissident types with a preference for anonymity and little time to spare. Example: there are 3d printed gun channels on YouTube, but they're small and flying under the radar for obvious reasons. Hm... they might make good recruits because they have CAD knowledge (and a lot of them are male weebs)

>>20263 I didn't say we needed them. I said we're going to build the waifu and they're not.

Friends I am going to make this robot and I'll tell you my secret sauce. The secret sauce is trying to make games. That's right if you do that you will gain super powers.

>>20301 How is this working?

>>20302 Well I did get the voltage multiplier working technically I think

>>20303 I mean, how is it related to making games? Mysterious.

>>20307 The most important thing I learned while making games is scope and sizing up problems and breaking them into manageable tasks.

>>20309 I would have said we're going to build the robot but that's clearly not the case. I'm trying to find out which kind of diodes I have to get for the voltage multiplier. I already know you guys are going to say you're too busy so why not say fuck it and just burn the bridges. No I will build the robot by myself.

>>20314 Yeah its best that I leave either way. This site drives me crazy for some reason. Bye. Good luck to everyone.

>>20314 What are you talking about, people were looking into it and helping every day. Also, only the muscle isn't the whole robot. >site drives me crazy for some reason. You seem to bit on edge, yes. Maybe only swing by from time to time. Not sure what better place you could find, though. 4chan?

>>20316 A robot muscle isn't the whole robot but it feels like it's half of it.

>>20314 >so why not say fuck it and just burn the bridges. Because this isn't /b/, friend. Take it easy, thanks. :^)

Well when I say robot i really mean sex bot. Disney had animatronics since 1963 or so. The kind of sex bot I'm thinking of has been possible for quiet a while.

If you want to make a waifubot you can think with your heart, but if you're like me and you want to make a sex bot you're going to have to start thinking with your dick lol

>>20388 Time to do some research https://www.tnaflix.com/amateur-porn/HMV-Aight%21-3D-%28Beatbar%29/video8291775

NEW THREAD NEW THREAD NEW THREAD >>20356 >>20356 >>20356 >>20356 >>20356 NEW THREAD NEW THREAD NEW THREAD

>>20112 >I have a BS in chemical engineering. My degree probably won't be useful until later on in the project when we are working with fluids. Well I can think of a use right now. I have an idea of making bones from cheap concrete. (I hope you see this). Concrete hardens by making a bunch of crystals that interlock. What's needed is reinforcement. There are some used now. Polyethylene, metal, basalt, etc. My idea idea is to use resorcinol (1,3-dihy- droxybenzene) glue or Urea Formaldehyde Glue, also known as Plastic Resin Glue. Now some of these are typical Urea Formaldehyde Glue which is used for typical glues used for all sorts of stuff. A thermoset plastic. They use these for all sorts of wallboard and other stuff. Bakelite is one of these. The regular water based stuff doesn't have that good of water resistance (normally). Not bad but not good as in continuous immersion. The Resorcinol based formulas do have really, really good water resistance. Even in boiling water. Here's the problem. These glues are mostly activated by an acid reaction. We need a basic catalyzed reaction. I know there is such a thing but it's a bit complicated for me and I'm not sure I understand how to get to that point. Is there any reasonable way to make basic(akaline) as opposed to acid catalyzed reaction? It's also needed to be water activated. In the past these sort of things were used for boats. Some older names for water based glues people used for boats, Resintite, Extramite Polymite, Aerolite, Cascamite. These are mostly the same, I think. A urea-formaldehyde with activator in a powder mix activated with water. A new glue supposedly the same as the older glues is Semforite, available here, http://www.maragon.co.uk/glue.html They say it's waterproof but...most of these water based glues are not. They are water resistant. The Resorcinol based ones are used for boats and to glue outdoor plywood together. Great stuff, but expensive. Both these glues are used in the millions of tons a year. And please don't say use epoxy as that stuff is not waterproof and expensive. Here's a patent US3689463A - Method of producing liquid water-soluble urea-formaldehyde resins employing an aryl or alkyl sulfonic acid - Google Patents https://patents.google.com/patent/US3689463A/en Is there any way to make this legible to someone with Chem 101 and 102? The basic idea is it makes a composite. The crystals in the concrete provide the compression strength the glue the tension. Using carefully graded sand, silica fume and fly ash you can get a very strong mixture. The glue would act like "Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE, UHMW)". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-molecular-weight_polyethylene UHMWPE bonds are not in themselves super strong but there are a LOT of them making the plastic very strong in tension. Better than Kevlar. They use UHMWPE for all sorts of stuff. Like bullet proof vest and sports equipment. All these tiny glue reactions between the crystals would give it strong tensile strength. Another class of glue that might be useful is barnacle glue. Which is again a little over my head. What is needed is a shake and bake sort of formula you can do without a chemical lab. Here's a paper on barnacle glue. The ones they have made are actually stronger than barnacle glues. which are some of the strongest bonds. "High Strength Underwater Bonding with Polymer Mimics of Mussel Adhesive Proteins (ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 9, issue 8) (2017)" http://libgen.rs/scimag/?q=High+Strength+Underwater+Bonding+with+Polymer+Mimics+of+Mussel+Adhesive+Proteins Some key words for these mussel type bonds are "Catechol-Containing", "poly(catechol-styrene)", "Click chemistry" I saw a paper where they used this sort of barnacle chemistry on cheap PVA glue to make a barnacle type bond. Some links https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/2/155 Recent Trends in Mussel-Inspired Catechol-Containing Polymers (A Review) http://libgen.rs/scimag/?q=Recent+Trends+in+Mussel-Inspired+Catechol-Containing+Polymers+%28A+Review%29 https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2022/03/mussels-synthetic-glue/ https://phys.org/news/2021-06-scientists-powerful-underwater-barnacles-mussels.html http://libgen.rs/scimag/?q=Simple+but+Strong_+A+Mussel-Inspired+Hot+Curing+Adhesive+Based+on+Polyvinyl+Alcohol+Backbone+%28Macromolecular+Rapid+Communications%2C+vol.+37%2C+issue+6%29+%282016%29 I know this is far out stuff but...why not mention it. It could greatly advance things.

>>23296 polymer and silicates yes, concrete no. Bones need to be flexible in a way that concrete cannot be without cracking or chipping, as well as too dense, water absorbent with the potential to develop interior mold if not perfectly cast and vibrated to release air pockets, and like you say, also needs a skeleton to maintain it's integrity. Concrete is often mixed with glues and emulsifiers to strengthen the bond and decrease curing times, but concrete isn't suitable for your purpose. You want something made like old roman or japanese armor, layers of resin and carbon fiber or acrylic laminate like a prosthetic limbs are made. Actually a high density 'plastic' bone is a good idea.

>>23297 >concrete isn't suitable for your >purpose I disagree. All the detriments you state for concrete are for the stuff you buy in a sack at home depot. Not what I'm talking about, at all. The goal is cost reduction. Sure carbon fiber would be better but at what cost? Fiberglass would be fine but at what cost? Titanium would be even better, but at what cost? There is such a thing as concrete that can be made into flexible credit card type card stock. Another alternative would be the same type glue I talked about with bamboo fibers making up the bulk of the material. It wold cost more because processing the bamboo fibers is a lot of work.

>>23298 Well because it probably won't be strong enough to maintain integrity along the vertical if you're casting bones in concrete. You're specifically talking about something like foamcrete, which you would mix with your own resinite or polymer. Flexible concrete is a foamcrete concrete mixed with fibers and plastizier, and still requires a rebar bracing, so your cost and labor is not insignificant. You admit there's better materials, and I'll tell you that the concrete is not going to be cheaper, and you're creating a structural issue for yourself right away. Flexible concrete is stronger that traditional concrete, but bones get pretty thin and you're connecting them by drilling into them or molding holes to pin into, or even setting joiners into the bones, which gets difficult the smaller the area of concrete you're working with. Rebar is also going to be a mess or a rod and the rod will have to flex. Plus you're developing this process from scratch so add that to your cost. I'm not saying don't try, but there are easier and cheaper methods.

>>23299 >You're specifically talking about something like foamcrete... No I'm not.You are throwing up straw Men that are not what I'm talking about. >You admit there's better materials The best material is that which is cheapest which will do the job you want. I'm not interested in building Olympic athlete level bone. Look I just asked some questions about a sort of glue on an off chance that someone would know how to proceed with a more basic activated waterproof formaldehyde glue. It's a odd thing but someone might happen to have an answer to this. I did give a patent reference of just such a thing. You keep telling me I must do it this way or that way but I'm telling you that there have been different ways that are not your way and that your way is not what I'm talking about. The bottom line is that there are huge advantages in cost and manufacturing if you could pour concrete into molds to make a whole skeleton or many of them at once. Fiberglass, carbon fiber, etc. requires either hand lay up, vacuum resin infusion or machinery that pressurizes the resin into the mold. All these requiring either a lot of hand labor. expensive consumables in the case of resin infusion or expensive machinery. I don't want to talk about this anymore because we're not talking about the same thing and I don't want to talk about concrete for hours.

It just came to me. I;ve been barking up the wrong tree. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moisture_cure_polyurethane Gorilla glue. Gorilla glue is waterproof, expands so it would coat good. https://www.gorillatough.com/product/original-gorilla-glue/ If you graded the concrete aggregate so that all spaces were very small you could likely have a very strong material. The Army did a study on concrete and that is how you make high strength concrete. This is why I write such weird stuff at times. Somehow writing this stuff down sometimes creates odd connections. I have no idea why I did not see this before. Of course it may not set in the extremely alkaline conditions of concrete. I'll have to find out. BTW way I have a folder on concrete and it's over 4GB in size on papers and books on concrete. Not that I've read every bit of it but I've seen a good bit. I really like concrete. It's an amazing material. Here's one paper with a mix for Ultra High Performance Concrete Development of Non-Proprietary Ultra-High Performance Concrete for Use in The Highway Bridge Sector 13100

After looking further. Too much water. Likely not work for gorilla glue but...will look more.

>>23303 Do you even know what a strawman is? I said foamcrete because it's actually the product you're looking for, not because I want to argue about it. You set up your concrete mold, get the chairs for your mesh or rod support, put the chairs under it, pour your mix, vibrate it until it's settled ,wait until the concrete begins to set, remove the chairs, set the skeleton back in, shake it again... You're doing a lot of hand work any way. I'm not telling you what you're going to do, I'm telling you what the properties of the material you are talking about will *allow* you to do. Considering I haven't actually told you to do anything, I've only offered some practical advice, I'll follow up with more advice. By all means please use concrete for diameters less than an inch because you're not worried about Olympic athlete level bones, I'm sure your books and folders on concrete will help you realise why it won't pass any stress tests.

>>23313 >Do you even know what a strawman is? Yeah it's an idea that someone proffers that is sure not to work so that they tell someone what they are doing is wrong. Like, >I said foamcrete because it's actually the product you're looking for... then you say, > I'm sure your books and folders on concrete will help you realise why it won't pass any stress tests. So yeah I'm fairly confident that what you're doing here is propping up a straw man. >I've only offered some practical advice Practical? I don't need any advice from people who tell me to use foamcrete for waifu bones. You don't know what I'm talking about. The question I asked was fairly narrow and likely very few people would know the answer. I only asked because...you never know. Someone might know the answer. Those that did would understand the references I gave. You did not. Hence your telling me about foamcrete and totally misunderstanding.