>>39909 Raspberry Pi is very friendly for this sort of thing, since the computer's "hard drive" is a little sd card.

>>39918 Exactly. Maybe even the Pi itself could be the core

>>39919 Ima be honest: swapping an sd card is easier than removing all the wiring required to make a raspberry pi interact with the world (d40, usbc power, hdmi) ;)

>>39921 Yeah true. It would be more expensive, as I was thinking of basically robotic husks, but the experience would much better if it was just a card to swap. Another advantage is making copies is much easier. Immortality through backup bodies and minds, very sci-fi

>>39918 Great point, Mechnomancer. I'm currently using 8GB RPi5. This is basically as good as a reasonable PC from about 10yrs ago today.

Robowaifu who's into raceplay, so she wants you to call her a "dirty clanker" in bed

Hey Chobitsu, would you mind getting on IRC tomorrow at around 7PM UTC? Thanks!

>>39944 Sure thing, Robi. See you then! :^) https://prolikewoah.com/t/20250722T19

/robowaifu/, Have you ever played Lucy The Eternity She Wished For? It's a game that has a cute android girl and I wanted to know if it was worth playing. Is it compared to other visual novels like Katawa Shoujo?

>>39950 We have a thread on this kind of topic. You might check there. >>18711

Hilarious thing I found on Twitter

>>39958 "BIO-JIHAD EXPOSED in Indore! Hindu transgenders allege they were injected with HIV by Muslim transgenders under the orders of the evil Count Dooku for refusing to convert to Islam! Many are infected and hospitalized, with protests forming on the streets India shaken by this Kinnar Jihad horror! Jedi Knights Anakin Skywalker and Obiwan Kenobi are sent into Indore to stop this dastardly plot"

Based Primitive Tech bro has released a few new videos over the past months. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGnWLXjIDnpBR4xqf3FO-xFFwE-ucq4Fj

There is no point in getting a job now. Itll be a nice athing to have so you can buy toys for the next 3 years before everyone gets fired and replaced with robots and ai. It is not an urgent what will you do by the time you retire shit anymore. its not serious shit.

>>39999 nigger pill yourself. I didn't say anything wrong faggot. You know 4chan's opensource. you could atleast set that up instead of spinning up vichan. I have vpns plus proxies. try me.

While it's been quite-delayed, I'm going to go ahead and start to make good my plan to address the smol debacle created in our Business & Legal bread this month (cf. >>39717 ). For now, I'm just going to copypasta posts ITT that were the ones in question. While there may be business-related information in them, their primary import concerned @Толкач (aka 'Fixer Anon'), and therefore were off-topic. I'll just move them for now, * then I'll address them at a later point. Cheers. :^) --- * My apologies to the Anons making the original (now-relocated) posts: I don't currently have the ability to copypasta your pics-related ITT. Also, the relo'd crosslinks is mostly kill. CBA to patch them up, personally. @Mods can feel free to if they're so inclined.

>>39816 Chobitsu be careful. Now I think that the reason that you were a little short with me, not that I was right, nor that I didn't deserve it, but just the same, was you are entranced by this gift from heaven of all this cash. Set up companies, No problem. Super investor and "pusher". Supposedly. But look what Толкач says >dad was a Soviet-era apparatchik And what sort of fellow might that be...ring any bells. Promise the world and yet... >I learned how to be a complete and utter sleazeball more of the same. >master bullshit-spewer, rivaling TED-Talk speech-givers, and I can negotiate anything with anyone, coming from a long line of party-grifters, sanction-busters, and hagglers Hmmm let's see what sort of people. or race, are REALLY good at this??? Well I just can't think of any, can you??? >First and foremost, regarding government red tape - for the first while, I can guarantee that the government will pay no attention to the project - at the very least, not to a degree where red tape is a concern. So he says,"no problem" all will be taken care of, don't worry. Really... >Excellent for stealing investor money, though - and then routing it through offshore companies to your private company, which actually manufactures the dolls. So right off the bat he's talking about ripping people off. Why do you think "somehow" you are not a mark, or any one of us? What makes you special? A real question to Толкач. Are you Jewish? And yes this question is very, very, very business related.

>>39810 >>39818 >>39830 I hinted at this with a meme on the Meta thread, but my concern is still there, using money earmarked for flower pots for robowaifus could be considered by some as "misleading investors". Plus, once we have to promote our robowaifus, the charade is permanently over. And it's going to look really weird when "American Pottery" comes out with a robot wife for some reason. Also Grommet has a good point. Our new friend speaks like a Call of Duty character, which I don't mind because sometimes I present GreerTech as a tech company, but some explanations would be nice. He mentioned legal counsel, is he a Saul Goodman-esque lawyer? Did he study modern business law, either officially or unofficially? After all, modern America is different from the Soviet Union, the corruption is less about bribery and more ideological (there still is bribery and nepotism, just not as much). The American version of giving a Soviet cop a few pocket dollars to avoid getting a ticket, is pulling out your phone and threatening to make it into a racial situation on tiktok. Honestly, if you want a robowaifu to buy, the best way to do it is to design a robowaifu using off-the-shelf parts with 3d printed components, distributing the plans online, then sell partially assembled kits from verified sellers

>>39834 Honestly all these schemes seem like they're easily stopped by (((investors))) >1. Robotics front company with gay CEO, comes out with robowaifu Then the social pressure is on the company still, and the investors can just tell them to stop selling robowaifus >2. Shell company with secondary robowaifu company to funnel money towards Highly shady, all finances in a company are typically recorded anyway.

>>39830 Ah. Allow me to open with the fact that I'm not Jewish, anon. I believe I *have* been slightly misunderstood. None of this is illegal. If I were giving you illegal advice, I'd be telling you to simply rugpull the investors; grab the money, and run. Or, sell out to a foreign nation. I'd tell you to artificially pump your stock price, then bankrupt the company immediately. From the very beginning, I'd mentioned the FTC. Would I be mentioning the FTC if I was trying to pull a scam? Why would I've mentioned building an actual profitable enterprise, to make the investors happy? These schemes are no different than the ones operated by almost every major corporation in North America. I ask of you to keep in mind that there is a big difference between a "scheme" and a "scam". The former is fully, completely, and perfectly legal - sure, it uses loopholes. The latter would be illegal. Which I don't condone in the slightest. I'd simply noticed that you anons have spoken extensively of VC funding, and getting investors. So, I figured, considering the public really despises robowaifus, and they are not whatsoever compliant with a publicly funded corporation, moreover, one that'd be run by American investors, who are more preoccupied with diversity quotas than your actual robowaifus - your robowaifu company plans may go slightly south. And finally. >stealing investor money I'm sure BlackRock and Google will really miss the $4MM it invests in our enterprise. Grommet, with all due respect - you act like I'm making you do all of this. You're acting like I'm telling you - "sign the contract, you son of a bitch." As I'd said - I'm here to give advice. That is all. I'm not making you agree to anything - heck, heh, I'm hardly asking what you're going to do. I receive questions, and I provide answers. Sleazeball, yes. Liar, no.

Now, as for GreerTech. >>39834 You have misunderstood, my friend. Through the great American Corporate Law System(tm) - you're not "misleading investors." The funds aren't being directly used for robowaifus. That, certainly, would be illegal. But, if we consider the same tricks every major company in the U.S. uses - from Amazon to Apple to Google to *any* of Musk's companies, to Goldman-Sachs, to JPMorgan-Chase, we'd see that they do the exact same thing. I'm not asking you to take money from investors, and buy 3D printers for printing robowaifus. No. You'd be getting money, from investors, for manufacturing 3D printed plant pots. But, you don't have any 3D printers. So, you need a subcontractor to provide the equipment. You set up a leasing company, Robowaifu Leasing Inc., which provides 3D printers on a contractual basis. You give the contract to Robowaifu Leasing Inc., such that it may acquire and set up 3D printers in your factory, but the printers remain Robowaifu Leasing Inc.'s property. You fund the company with additional contracts for maintenance. Next thing you know, Robowaifu Leasing Inc. is a profitable company with an excellent assortment of purchased equipment. There's no reason why Robowaifu Leasing Inc. couldn't offer you *new* 3D printers 6 months later, and "retire" its old ones - all for a new contract. That's not a scam. That's just how every U.S. Senator ends up rich by the time they're out of office. Have you ever considered this - if they're banned from owning or running companies that may present a Conflict of Interest with their position, how come all of their wives, children, cousins, brothers, and sisters own construction companies? Or, why they award government contracts to people who are lifelong friends? >america is different from the soviet union Not a single piece of advice I've presented would've worked in the Soviet Union - all of this is based on American, European, and Canadian trade law. Surely you do not think that the Soviet Union had enterprise law, when there wasn't even a legal definition for a "corporation" there? This is all U.S. law, my friend. "Making a CEO gay" would've gotten you shot in the Soviet Union (there certainly were no CEOs, but if you made a Factory Director gay, you'd probably end up in prison.) Call me what you like, my friend. But, don't misunderstand me. >some explanations would be nice Worry not, anon - any points you want clarified, just mention them - I'd be happy to elaborate. >it'd look weird when American Pottery comes out with robowaifus Ah, again, you have misunderstood me, Grommet. From the very beginning, I'd mentioned making two separate companies. Elon Musk's holding companies have manufactured flamethrowers General Electric produces everything from pharmaceuticals to the M134 Minigun, through its various daughter companies. >off-the-shelf parts That's fine too. Whatever you anons see as the best way to go about it - after all, the first questions towards me asked how to build an enterprise. If you anons would prefer to build a small sole proprietorship, or private company, specializing in kits - that's perfectly alright. I'd be happy to discuss how to go about that too.

>>39837 The robotics front company with the gay CEO wouldn't be the one rolling out robowaifus. It'd be a publicly owned corporations, with a publicly-picked Board of Directors, governed by the laws and regulations of Securities and Exchange Commission. Robowaifus would be manufactured by a completely different, privately held company. Registered offshore. Unrelated to the public corporation - bound only by occasional contracts, and the like. >funnel money from the public one to the private one Anon, they are supposed to be recorded. This is a completely transparent operation, because there's nothing illegal about it. What I'm saying has been misunderstood as "illegal counsel." What I'm saying is such basic corporate law strategy, that I'd feel comfortable going up in court, and describing all of this. If I thought any of this illegal, I wouldn't have been a fool enough to post so on a public forum; with traceable IPs; on the Internet; for a company which I presume might one day end up manufacturing robowaifus. Again. Sleazeball, yes. Liar / Criminal, no.

Gentlemen, I believe we've come to a slight impasse - a stalemate, of sorts. You have taken my confession to being a sleazeball, and misunderstood it as an admission to being a criminal, a liar, or a scammer (or, all three - I can't quite tell.) Or, at the very least, have become convinced of the criminality / potential liability of my counsel. With no interest in proving anything - I'd have become a scientist or a humanities major if I wanted to spend my days debating - short of the occasional clarification as in, >>39842 >>39841 >>39840 I wouldn't feel it to be a decent use of time - neither mine, nor yours, anons. Similarly, while I'm flattered by the implication that my words somehow render you obliged to follow my advice, I'm uninterested in clarifying each time that this is just "tips and tricks of American Corporate Law", and not "you *have* to open a company just like I said you should." If my consulting is seen as a used car salesman using superglue to hold up a broken bumper, I would much rather prefer to know so - so that we can all save ourselves some time.

Sorry I'm really busy today & most of tomorrow. I'll wade in on this stuff probably in ~30hrs or so. Cheers. >>39830 I appreciate your concern, Grommet. But I think you're being a bit silly. A) What's a stake on my part here? Nothing. B) This are all legal machinations -- invented by the kikes themselves, and primarily (or so they intend) for their sole benefit. As I mentioned, I'm willing to put that right back at them. ( >>39792 ) I'll discuss this with you (all) more soonish. Cheers, Anon. :^)

>>39841 Apologies - >>39834 I meant to say Greer, not Grommet.

>>39840 >Grommet, with all due respect - you act like I'm making you do all of this. You're acting like I'm telling you - "sign the contract, you son of a bitch." As I'd said - I'm here to give advice. That is all. I'm not making you agree to anything - heck, heh, I'm hardly asking what you're going to do. No one said you're doing this >>39841 Granted, I don't know the ins and outs of corporate law. Thank you for elaborating >Soviet Union Your "resume" mentioned secondhand experience from the Soviet Union, and your lineage of presumably other Soviet officials, as your credentials >Elon Musk's flamethrowers That was a promotional/fundraising stunt for his construction company (The Boring Company). It may seem ridiculous now, but Elon Musk used to be very popular and supported by all >General Electric That has the benefit of being under the good graces of the powers that be. >>39843 Frankly, what did you expect? You present yourself as a shadowy "sleazeball" figure that can "get us anything", who has "contacts", who, by your own admission, >"From him, I learned how to be a complete and utter sleazeball - I CAN Ramon my way into positions I should never be trusted with. This includes obtaining any sort of permit, getting any sort of logistics chain in place, and so on - a толкач through and through.", and >"I am a master bullshit-spewer, rivaling TED-Talk speech-givers, and I can negotiate anything with anyone, coming from a long line of party-grifters, sanction-busters, and hagglers." I assume English is not your first language, but a "Sleazeball" is by definition, someone that should not be trusted. >Similarly, while I'm flattered by the implication that my words somehow render you obliged to follow my advice, I'm uninterested in clarifying each time that this is just "tips and tricks of American Corporate Law", and not "you *have* to open a company just like I said you should." No one is saying that, and it's equally as suspicious that you keep framing it that way. All me and Grommet are saying is "hey, is this self-proclaimed untrustworthy sleazeball bullshitter really trustworthy?"

>>39846 Mate, I know what a sleazeball is. I won't flatter myself too much, but I'd say my English is adequate. Here's the line all of this is referring to. >Why do you think "somehow" you are not a mark, or any one of us? What makes you special? Plus, as per your own words, >"hey, is this self-proclaimed untrustworthy sleazeball bullshitter really trustworthy?" My response - >"Grommet, with all due respect - you act like I'm making you do all of this. You're acting like I'm telling you - "sign the contract, you son of a bitch." As I'd said - I'm here to give advice. That is all. I'm not making you agree to anything - heck, heh, I'm hardly asking what you're going to do." Even now, you're worried I'm somehow trying to screw you guys. >"It's equally as suspicious." My response, above, is saying just that - even *I* couldn't come up with a way to screw you, having quite literally, put all of my cards on the table. I'm not asking you to sign any contracts - I'm not asking you to do anything - I'm not even asking you to agree with me. That either makes me the worst scammer in the world, or, it means I wasn't trying to screw you in the first place. If a scam succeeds after its supposed orchestrator has admitted to be an untrustworthy sleazeball, one of two things is true - either the man is the most brilliant manipulator in history (which I am not) - or the men he's scamming are complete idiots (which you don't seem to be.) One note - this is my last response as to this entire debacle; I can help you anons, or I can slink back to where I came from. Honestly, no hard feelings one way or another.

>>39816 >Grommet, with all due respect - you act like I'm making you do all of this. You're acting like I'm telling you - "sign the contract, you son of a bitch." You made that up. For me, attributed negative things that I say or attributing notions I have not presented, that I didn't say, is a bit of a warning sign for me. >As I'd said - I'm here to give advice. That is all. I'm not making you agree to anything - heck, heh, I'm hardly asking what you're going to do. Fair enough but your manner of presentation reminds me, a lot, of a certain bunches tactics. If you are here to help then you will certainly not be opposed to making sure that the wrong sort are not involved and there is due diligence.

>>39843 >You have taken my confession to being a sleazeball, and misunderstood it as an admission to being a criminal I do not accuse you of being a criminal but there is some possibility of us doing the work and, perfectly legally, you end up with all the profits and we end up with either nothing, very little or even worse a big pile of debt. It's not like this has not happened before. Frequently. >america is different from the soviet union I think the US has become very much like the former Soviet Union. Some of the control vectors are different but it's same old Oligarchical control.

I'll leave it alone. I was just making observations.

>>39844 AUUUGHH! :D I'm going to need still more time. I went without sleep for waay too long, and now I'm pretty zonked. Hopefully in the next day or so. Cheers. :^)

>>39849 Note for reader Replace >>39816 with >>39840

I'm still in the midst of things IRL, but I'll just drop this here as a quick note. I'll plan to try and address specific points ITT more-fully this coming weekend sometime once I've rested and collected my thoughts. <---> "The Fixer" -Anon (@Толкач) is perfectly welcome to continue posting everywhere on /robowaifu/ . His business savvy is something I value, and I recommend every'non here study it, at least if you are interesting in selling robowaifus to Anons & Joe Sixpacks at some point. And the fact he's suggesting approaches that are within the specific guidelines (((created))) by the (((legal system))) is basically shrewd wisdom, IMO. [1] The old saying is >It takes money to make money. While I personally am not in this for money, I'm smart enough to recognize the need for it. I also trust the Lord to guide us all here into wisdom in our robowaifu-doings. We're most certainly going to need it!! Cheers. :^) --- 1. "The master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly. For the sons of this age are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the sons of light." https://biblehub.com/luke/16-8.htm (BSB)

I want to say one more thing about this. Chobitsu, I think, thinks I'm just being negative for no good reason. Basically, get off my lawn. But I see it as just being rational and trying to make sure that we don't end up with just another globalhomo monopoly. Now you might say this silly but...what have we seen not so long ago. Musk puts a $100 million into a OpenAI a "supposed" open source, non-profit AI company then Sam Altman takes it over, makes it for profit and gets control from Musk. Maybe this is a good thing, and there many details to this but there's no doubt what Musk motivations were to put money into it and how that is not what it has become. So it's not like some silly Womanish worry that things might not go as planned. And I am NOT in any against anyone making money. I hope some serious cash is made but not at the expense of making the whole thing just another monopoly closed source controlled profit machine for the globalhomo.

DISCUSSION OF BOARD USERS SHOULD BE CONTAINED TO THE META TREAD >>39871 I understand your point perfectly, and I imagine Chobitsu does as well. That said, the simple fact of the matter is that nothing is happening yet. We're just in the stage of trading ideas, and the new guy is currently doing nothing to jepordize board culture. I think it's best to table this until something changes, or when the time comes to lay the cards down. Or at the very least, move this discussion to the meta thread. It has no place in this thread. On that note, I'm locking this thread until tomorrow morning.

>>39874 Lets continue the thread lock, for the time being...

In the entire history of /robowaifu/ , I've made 1 (one) (n. a single unit) demand to keep a specific thread on-topic. Let's all try to keep our Business & Legal thread ( >>39717 ) strictly on-topic henceforward, Anons. Cheers. :^) >END OF RELOCATIONS

What do you guys think about attracting people who can reverse engineers, and software crackers and hackers to robowaifu community? I believe that we wmight get to FOSS robowaifus by piggybacking off the research and products of major companies. Sort of like how, atleast in the early days of open source LLMs, it was almost exclusively carried by Meta's Llama models. Same way, if we get one of those cool robots that some Chinese company or Boston Dynamics releases, maybe the same softwarre crackers who manage to crack or bypass Denuvo, Adobe's DRM can crack the robot's software and hardware.

>>40084 Sure absolutely, Anon. Not only do we need Grey/White -hat crackers to crack/fuzz/pen -test our own robowaifu systems as part of our broader Privacy, Safety, & Security (cf. >>10000 ) efforts...understanding memory layouts, &tc., involved with systems cracking is a highly-valuable set of skills useful for crafting hardened, embedded & C4 software engineering for our own robowaifu systems. >tl;dr Absolutely! Great idea, Anon. I'll leave you to it. Cheers. :^)

I don't want to stir panic, but with the recent developments around Visa & MC pushing for censorship, various governments wanting to mandate photo IDs to access websites, and other calls for censorship emerging, I'm a little concerned. I've never had a backup plan for the web because I'd never thought the "wild west" period would come to an end. I feel like we might be in that sweet twilight era right now before everything goes dark. I'm considering researching MIRC, vBulletin and phpBB style tech. It'd be nice to set up a decentralized community like things were back in 2005 or so. Would that even be a viable solution? If the net as we know it became fully locked down, would there be a place to escape to? There's no sense worrying about it and I'm not trying to make a replacement for /robowaifu/, just something that's been bugging me as of late. >Go out and touch grass. That's a real possibility. What's the secret handshake? Where do we meet up? You gotta keep out the glowies, but the more you try to do that, the more inclined they are to infiltrate your community. Seems like the best answer is to hide in plain sight. I'm probably just venturing down a schizo rabbit hole...

>>40099 No worries, Anon. And I think we'll be fine. They always tell me >"Where there's a will, there's a way." --- Even if we have to create our own custom platform app that bypasses the web system entirely, we'll still press forward together. >tl;dr The Robowaifu Age will dawn, regardless. At this point its simply a matter of time. Cheers. :^)

>>40099 >It'd be nice to set up a decentralized community like things were back in 2005 or so. Would that even be a viable solution? If the net as we know it became fully locked down, would there be a place to escape to? Exists now. Look up the Invisible Internet Project (I2P). It's done for standard web server based content. It has a built in server just like a normal server but you do NOT have to buy server time. It's built in to the software and your location is encrypted. A caveat, if the NSA or some very sofisticated source wished to spend a damn fortune eventually they likely could find your location but it would not be easy and would cost a buttload of money. Not something likely for a waifu site. I talked about this a bit here, >>34976 I also talked a great deal about it elsewhere in the board but...I don't have the link and it was a better comment. Sigh... https://geti2p.net/en/ and likely a better I2Pd but less features on the same network done in C++ https://i2pd.website/ There is a glitch, or what I think is a glitch. Normal servers as you know have all the data on one server. It can be DOSed. The software is there but it's not linked together to overcome this DOS problem. There are all the pieces of software out there to overcome this but they are NOT linked. I'm talking not about standard server client but server multi-clients based on splitting up everything and serving from multiple sources. BitTorrent does this(sorta), the interplanetary Internet does this, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Internet zeronet does this, https://zeronet.io/ Freenet sort of does this(name changed to Hyphanet), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphanet So the pieces are there. I mean libraries exist, in various forms but they are not joined into a whole that can be used on I2P. Someone smarter than I, not difficult to reach that level, needs to stitch the various libraries into a whole with a web page front end board. I2P has a built in encrypted torrent system and a normal free server that you can get your own moniker, or equivalent url, but for I2P only, free. It is internal to I2P just like http url's are internal to the regular internet. So free server and free url. I get all my movies and TV shows from magnet files posted on I2P and downloaded with it's built in BitTorrent down loader program, I2PSnark. This would be the ideal, but not done. So imagine if you have a server and maybe text and a small thumbnail picture is on the server. Not so much data so less risk of DOS attack. But all the major pictures, files, books, software, anything over a couple Mb or whatever is magnet files. These would be downloaded just like torrent files. To make it plain. You see a robowaifu board like now but want to download a linked paper, video, whatever. So you right click to open in a new tab and then instead of going to the server the server sends a magnet file and that magnet file, which is actually a form of a torrent file, then looks over the I2P network, finds the file and downloads it to your browser, or, downloads it to your computer like any other normal file. The key problem is that no one, that I know of, has such software so that it would automatically download a magnet file and then route to your computer from a board or would up load the same to a board. The software at a low level exists, as I went on and on about, but the glue gluing it together for this function does not. (Likely because this stuff is not easy even if the libraries to do the low level stuff exist already). cont. Some ideas. Going even further down the tech rabbit hole. The actual board itself could be one big pile of torrents. (This is very much like the old Freenet). The server with it's I2P only url could only be a big ass placeholder of magnet files with maybe a short term storage for pictures and papers. You go to a page and it feeds you a mass of tiny torrents which are in fact the pages data that when assembled is a web page. This is exactly what zeronet and freenet(name changed to Hyphanet) did. Unfortunately zeronet used JavaScript which for me, well I just do not trust it. You could set aside a space and you, the original I2P url and every single person could have a copy of everything on robowaifu. Everyone would serve each other. You could limit your space used and anytime it gets too big you could drop the older files, I think it would also be prudent to be able to delete any file that you find offensive. Some other ideas. When you download a board web page all the text and the thumbnails are downloaded to your local server to view AND to send it to others but the linked files would not be unless you asked to download or view them. Another thing that would be nice, as it annoys me, is not to change the file names. I suspect this is done to not confuse files on boards. Maybe since these are magnet files just like a magnet file are presently it would not be a problem. An example, This is a magnet file for the "Wim Hoff method" magnet:?xt=urn:btih:7f9ac7e28849eb9c449fa757e8dfed6d7cf5df93&dn=Wim Hof Method - Extraordinary in everyone &tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fzer0day.ch%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969

cont. So it tells you a magnet which is a HASH function of the file, then the name, then url's where there are trackers that are used to feed you seeders and leechers to find pieces where you can download all the data for it. In fact all you need is the magnet file part and if anyone has that magnet HASH file they can serve it to you. Something I should add. When you download the magnet from the waifu board server, the server would also act as a tracker and send you addresses, like the magnet file above, where people have pieces or full copies of the file. It would also be nice to not have the board assign a different, numerical name, for files uploaded. The idea being the name could be the same but the download HASH means there is no collision with different files, even if named the same. IF the HASH is the same, then it IS the same file, even if renamed. That's a pet peave of mine on boards. Having to constantly cut and paste names and rename stuff, I mean isn't that what computers are for to do drudge work? There's one BIG ASS problem with this. There are people about that DO NOT want this to happen. They DO NOT want a free internet especially one that is anonymous. I know of three people that have disappeared that worked on these networks. The original J Random that created I2P, disappeared one day, never heard from again. zzz who picked up the pieces of I2P and worked away for over ten years on it and one day disappeared and has, as far as I know, never been heard from again and the writer of zeronet who one day, is just gone. So if you do this, do all the work on I2P itself and serve the program only from I2P. The guys who do Hyphanet(old freenet) are still around but they only update from within the anonymous network and I do not think they are public. Of course you could just use a regular computer, load up I2P, and serve a robowaifu board right now. It would be a little slower but no different from the server you have right now. All the rest, automatic magnet files, whatever could be extra. Another possibility is to have the normal site on I2P and people just get used to serving magnet files for any file you want to upload. You can make them right in the I2PSnark program built in. So like the Wim Hoff file I showed, just add in the magnet file into your comment and people could paste it into I2PSnark and download any file you want of any size as long as someone still served it.

>>40099 >>40100 >>40101 >>40102 Honestly, I have terrified of this as well. I'm glad to see there are ways to hide and adapt. My source of optimism is that almost everyone, from both sides of the political spectrum, are against this. Even if the internet is completely censored, that means there will be more bipartisan rage against the system. What I'm worried is about fringe websites. I know some in the UK were forced to shut down. For mainstream sites, you weren't anonymous anyway, a photo ID is basically a hat on a hat. For robowaifu creators, make sure to post on multiple platforms and have multiple backups. I plan on making an Internet Archive page soon.

>>40106 If you live in America, make sure to contact your representative about KOSA. I know it's not much, but it's better than doing nothing and just complaining, plus it's free and only takes up a little bit of your time. Make sure to use words that will appeal to their party. If you live in a state with blue reps, talk about censorship of LGBT+ resources and family planning. If you live in a state with red reps, talk about left-wing censorship. https://www.stopkosa.com/

>>40106 >I'm glad to see there are ways to hide and adapt. We'll be fine, Grommet GreerTech. Just work while its still day. :^) >>40109 Lel. OK, I did. >talk about censorship of LGBT+ resources and family planning. I also added suppression of religious freedoms (cheekily within the same breath, lol). As a Christian, I'm quite certain that we (Christians) will be labeled as """terrorists; enemies of the state""" once the Globohomo kikes gain ever-stronger strangleholds on freezepeach platforms of every type to suppress the goyim. :^) >protip: God will laugh the [raging] nations to derision. The >tl;dr here is every one of these satanic schemes by 'the synagogue of' will roll back upon their own heads in the end. :DD >=== -patch name

>>40111 *GreerTech, not Grommet

>>40111 >>40113 Lol my apologies, Anon. Still waking up today. :P

>>40111 The good news is that so far, I don't think this site is banned in the UK (knock on wood), and that's the most restrictive law so far. Some say 4chan was banned, but I don't think that's actually true. Neocities is also not restricted as far as I know

I'm not really an AI guy, so my knowledge of the subject is pretty limited to the basics of neural networks, but one guy I follow has been mentioning using cortical column networks for his virtual pets. Can someone give me a quick rundown on what it even is? It mostly sounds like gibberish to me.