>>36113 >use paging with SSD's to act as gigantic slow RAM for AI I ran across this again. I was looking at motherboards and thought about this. They are now making boards with far more slots for SSD's on cards and way bigger memory. I suspect to feed the quest for local AI. So here's one SSD, WD_BLACK 1TB SN850X NVMe Internal Gaming Solid State Drive with Heatsink - Works with Playstation 5, Gen4 PCIe, M.2 2280, Up to 7,300 MB/s - WDS100T2XHE for $100 USD. Wow. And a while ago just as an exercise I said hey what if we simulated neurons with 16 bits and came up with 170GB would be able to represent all 80 billion human neurons at 16 bits each.[not saying this is actually human level] >>32606 So now we see people using SSD's and above, to swap out AI's or page them. Now I'm fairly ignorant about AI's but have seen some things they can do and what if we have "severely" narrow interest AI's So let's say we have 7B. I have began to assume that means you need about 7GB to run it. With a 128GB RAM you could run several of those. Maybe have one 7B to only navigate. I think you could do it with this. Maybe have a more powerful 32B to listen, and converse. Backed up by a couple of 2 TB SSD"s on this fast bus they are doing now. I think one of the big blocks is to have the waifu have the ability to categorize information. Hard to explain. So it can recognize and do some actions based on what it hears but the key to acting is to squash the amount of data it needs from the SSD for speed. Maybe somehow set up the library of congress catalog system and use it to make it where it could rapidly more the pertinent section of data she needs from the SSD to working memory. I thought I would mention it as maybe someonehas a bright idea on how that catogorization scheme would be done. "If" it could be done I think it would take us closer to a fuly functioning waifu. I think the hardware is getting really close. If you have the cash, $5,000 for 1 TB memory, processors and big mother board you can get real close right now.

>>36831 This picture you linked http://bhlnasxdkbaoxf4gtpbhavref7l2j3bwooes77hqcacxztkindztzrad.onion/.media/e54491d9626ff811f3601ab82483785af24514c5d14741da169f966e73a29192.gif if you know anything about "pole shift" that picture will scare the hell out of you.

>>36834 [Little kid holding on to bar with heavy weight on a bearing. They spin up weight (gyroscope) and then spin kid around. Heavy weight he can not lift floats up in the air.] Kid,"WOW! what is that! [Super esteemed scientist that everyone pays attention too and worships him (like Einstein)] Scientist,"its gyroscopic precession" Kid [blank look on his face] "uhhh....what's gyroscopic precession" scientist,"that's when the torque vector orthogonal to the vector of angular momentum happens" Kid [blank look on his face] "uhhh....what's the torque vector push against and what happens then? scientist,"that's when gyroscopes fly up in the air with very little force applied." Kid, [more blank looks, but says nothing because he knows when adults are feeding him nonsense he's not supposed argue with them.]

>>36889 So, my favorite example of this sort of linguistic abuse is from the baste movie Lion King (the original, of course). The monke Rafiki bonks young Simba on his noggin with his magical monke stick. >"OWW!! Whad'ya do that for!?" <Doesn't matter...it's in the past.

>>36893 The torque vector of a gyroscope practically "pushes" against change in orientation using kinetic energy from angular momentum. It's simply Newton's laws of motion acting on a rotating mass which is reacting to external force vectors. It could act relative to nearest gravity well, which helps tops and bicycles stay up, act against your body in amusement park rides, etc... This is oversimplifying, this article is a good explainer. https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/University_Physics_(OpenStax)/Book%3A_University_Physics_I_-_Mechanics_Sound_Oscillations_and_Waves_(OpenStax)/11%3A__Angular_Momentum/11.05%3A_Precession_of_a_Gyroscope

>>36899 Neat, thanks Kiwi! Added to my science bookmarks.

>>36899 [Little kid holding on to bar with heavy weight on a bearing. They spin up weight (gyroscope) and then spin kid around. Heavy weight he can not lift floats up in the air.] Kid,"WOW! what is that! [Super esteemed scientist that everyone pays attention too and worships him (like Einstein)] Scientist,"its gyroscopic precession" Kid [blank look on his face] "uhhh....what's gyroscopic precession" scientist,"that's when the torque vector orthogonal to the vector of angular momentum happens" Kid [blank look on his face] "uhhh....what's the torque vector push against and what happens then? Scientist," well that's when torque vector of a gyroscope practically "pushes" against change in orientation using kinetic energy from angular momentum" Kid [looking confused but then brightens when he has an idea] Kid,"So angular momentum, that's the same thing that happens when when you fire a railgun and there's very little force on the mount compared to the force on the ammo that's ejected from the railgun" (see note 1) Kid[really hitting his stride now] and this is all the "equivalency principle" like Einstein said!" [Scientist visibly flustered] Scientist,"no, no , no you have it all wrong. It's not the same" kid,"Then maybe it's the same as the heavy cart that doesn't smash a glass when a flywheel is rapidly spun up the moment the glass is hit but it shatters to pieces if the flywheel is unattached and does not rapidly start spinning. Like in the video. That's angular momentum...right?" Video where they crash a cart into a glass bottle with and without the bumper. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDiWFqM94gM [Scientist turning red] Scientist,"no, no , no you have it all wrong. It's not the same" Scientist,"no, we don't talk about the railgun or the spin up of flywheels effecting force. Only when we talk about gyroscopes." Kid,"but, don't these seem the same..." Scientist,"Doesn't matter...it's in the past, we named this and all you need to know is we are right" scientist,"all you need to know is that's when gyroscopes fly up in the air with very little force applied." Kid, [more blank looks, but says nothing because he knows when adults are feeding him nonsense he's not supposed argue with them.] Note (1) Abstract of physics thesis of Matthew K. Schroeder for a physics degree Naval Postgraduate School. "...An interesting debate in railgun research circles is the location, magnitude, and cause of recoil forces, equal and opposite to the launched projectile. The various claims do not appear to be supported by direct experimental observation. The goal of this research paper is to develop an experiment to observe the balance of forces in a model railgun in a static state. ..." Quote from thesis, "...a reaction to the rails or power source. By suspending a model railgun as a pendulum and mechanically decoupling the power supply from the rails via a liquid metal contact we were able to precisely record the force on a mechanically coupled rail-and-armature system with a known current. We then decoupled the rails from the power supply and the armature, fixed the armature to the table, and precisely recorded the reaction force. With current at 2200A in our model gun the theoretical force on the armature (using Kerrisk’s L’ of 0.895µH/m) was 2.16N yet the reaction force on the rails was less than we could measure (with sensitivities as low as 0.024N). Thus, the magnitude of the theoretical force on the armature was at least two orders of magnitude greater than the recoil..." https://archive.org/details/aninvestigationo109453528/aninvestigationo109453528/

esteemed scientist,"we named this long ago" esteemed scientist," What difference at this point does it make?" hhttps://i.imgflip.com/1bzmnv.jpg

>>36908 >Heavy weight floats up It does not, the kid in this example still needs to input significant force whilst moving into precession. They are using the energy stored in angular momentum to counter some of gravity's force. >Railgun tangent This is unrelated to how gyroscopes work. Recoil is still real. The only real similarity to how gyroscopes work is reliance on Newton's 3rd law, objects resist change to their inertia. Usually the devices firing the load have high masses to increase their inertia because of Newton's 3rd law. See this video of a canon if you doubt Newton's 3rd law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JvEauyaI5M >Cart doesn't break glass tangent In this case, the cart doesn't break the glass because the kinetic energy of the collision was transferred. The rod on the front of the cart hits the glass, an equal but opposite force is imparted by the glass. The rod then transfers this energy into flywheels. By doing this, the total forces felt by the glass are greatly diminished. Close to half the kinetic energy from the collision goes into the flywheel. It's the same reason rubber balls bounce, the kinetic energy from a collision is transferred. Also why bumper cars have big things of rubber and springs. Also why cars have springs in their suspension. The only real similarity to how gyroscopes work towards helping elevate large rotating masses is that they both involve transferring kinetic energy. It's honestly simpler than you're making it out to be. These are just simple well understood aspects of physics. Heck, try spinning with something heavy, you should intuitively be able to feel how and why that mass becomes easier to lift for you. I use this principle to help with my lifts when working out.

>>36911 >the kid in this example still needs to input significant force whilst moving into precession This is absolutely, definitely 100% not true and anyone, anyone can see this. Don't try to gas-light me I do not appreciate it. Here's what is going on. Scientist could not explain what they saw so they said,"the torque is being transferred" but what they really did was this. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d6/e7/54/d6e754d24aaef324c1595e68583ace7a.png They just made this shit up. Now some of you say I am stating Newton's law is not conserved. I am not. You put words into my mouth I dd not say. I say that the force is transferred against the inertia of the universe and pushes against it. Anyone with eyes can see the force is not done by whoever is holding the gyro. >Railgun tangent >This is unrelated to how gyroscopes work) >See this video of a canon if you doubt Newton's 3rd law. bait and switch. You can't explain the railgun so you start talking about cannons Says who it's unrelated??? Is one set of forces in one device somehow magically different from the other? I, am completely consistent in talking about this being the same force while others talk about (magic) converting angular momentum into force that doesn't push against the person holding the device. Which of us is on a tangent? What has been done is that a centripetal force, one going outward in which you would draw a vector of the force pointing outward "somehow" its been determined that it flips, with no "equal and opposite force", onto a completely different direction. Now if this doesn't sound screwy to you then you are not paying attention. Here he tried to show me the vector forces >>36827 but he left out the 90Kg going down. Normal engneering analysis if you draw all the vector forces you can add them all up and they all perfectly work out. But if you draw the actual vector forces in gyroscopes, assuming the "standard model" you will have to magically switch some of them to get the actual reaction of a gyroscope. You can not add them up like normal vectors without some (magic) "transfer the torque 90 degrees" or some other odd trick to get it to happen. Why is this transfer of forces so different from any others? Well I have an answer that is consistant. The alternative just saying,"well we explained this long ago" is meaningless. You know they explained ulcers "long ago" but someone found out it was caused by a bacteria by "paying attention" and noticing people given large antibiotic doses had their ulcers disappear. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. And stop pointing me to made up stuff like "the torque is being redirected" because this is totally made up and meaningless. You're just throwing words at me while not defining what these words mean. Explain this "torque changing direction force". You may not believe what I say but there's no magic and all of it is fundamentally consistent. There's no "magic happens here" stuff.

90 degree vector torque redirection https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d6/e7/54/d6e754d24aaef324c1595e68583ace7a.png

Anyone else think gyroscopes are bizarre magic, or are we good? (Grommet, I accept you don't understand, I give up on teaching you.)

>>36915 >gyroscopes are bizarre magic Nada. I do not think gyroscopes are bizarre magic. I think your explanation for their actions is. Totally different. I expect the vast majority of people will read all this and think me some fool.That's ok. There will a few, very few, who will "immediately" see my objections and realize they have been had.

>>36915 Lol. I think we can all agree that the creativity, beauty, and -- above all -- wisdom of the Creator who devised all this reality around is, quite-literally, beyond all our comprehension!! :D Not only am I personally OK with that, I relish it! Life would be far too boring if we served a God we could all put in our little 'God box' haha. :^) >tl;dr >"He's wild, you know. Not like a tame lion." >t. Tumnus

>>36941 >>36949 Reading this In memoriam Hackaday article about Don Lancaster ( >>36951 ), I saw a number of commenters mention this guy, Forrest Mims. [1][2] I don't know anything about him, but do any Anons here know about him so we can figure out the right way/what to save up from his stuff that could help robowaifuists here, before he passes away too? (As a caution to us: Don Lancaster's ebay site has now disappeared, and -- as Grommet points out -- we're lucky to still have his personal site [which could vanish anytime], for example.) <---> ALSO: Any other valuable engineering or other resources Anons know of that it would behoove us all to preserve for our robowaifu's AIs in the future? I know I've personally saved 10's of thousands of individual pics/pages of Interwebs throds + /robowaifu/ , locally, through the years for information+redpilling+training, etc... but what else should I be saving? What are you Anons personally saving for your/her/our posterity & legacy & continued intelligence (as in IQ) going forward through the years? >tl;dr The GH doesn't want Anons in-specific to recall any of this stuff; much less alway rember it [3]. --- 1. https://forrestmims.org/ 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrest_Mims 3. https://bookanalysis.com/1984/memory-hole/ >=== -add'l hotlink/footnote -prose edit -add 'also' sec

>tfw you may be autismo but you may nevar reach these undreamt-of levels!! https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlxcuGyRdticxSyCJqJX8Ka03FUJh2IKh Lol. Time to up my game. :DD

>>36952 >Forrest Mims He wrote a bunch of starting electronic experimenting type booklets. Very good stuff. Also a ton of electronic articles. Some of this stuff is not really applicable but a vast amount still is. They were taking earlier electronics that vastly lacked the capabilities of present day stuff and doing astonishing stuff by trying every trick they could to get more functionality out of the electronic parts. I was reading his wikipedia article and this gives and idea of the level hacking they were doing, "...Mims conceived a computer that could translate twenty words from one language to another. The input was six potentiometers (variable resistors) each having a dial with 26 letters..." Talk about something from nothing.

Don Lancaster was totally enamored with the postscript programming language. Originally conceived as a way to represent any sort of document it was also a fully Turing complete programming language. I'm not super knowledgeable about it but I think one of it's attributes is that it can do calculations while not needing a lot of memory or computing power. it could take little chunks of code and work on them a little at a time. I think, it sort of like Forth which you can do most anything with. The flexibility and the ability to quickly dash off fairly complicated software is sort of like LISP or Rebol. With the added benefit that since it's a display language it's great for formatting the output so you can see it. A tangent to electronics. At one time Sun computer systems created a whole GUI based on postscript. Later taken up, in spirit, by Steve Jobs at NeXT computer. At one time this GUI "NEWS" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeWS came very, close to being the GUI for Linux and Unix workstations. It was on many Unix workstations for a while. I suspect if they would have bitten the bullet on this and gone with the postscript GUI instead of the crappy substitutes they have now Linux would have crushed Microsoft. It took slightly more compute so they refused. Sun was having trouble competing with new workstations and with MS as the power of desktops got higher and ceased work on it. A shame.

>>36968 Thanks, Grommet.

BTW here's the internet archiive page for all?? his work. https://archive.org/search?query=Don+Lancaster A boo you might download and read, I think I have a copy is, Incredible Secret Money Machine Don Lancaster It's about how to make money gears towards technical people. I think I haven't read it in decades and in fact I will download and read it again. https://archive.org/details/Incredible_Secret_Money_Machine_Don_Lancaster It would likely have good advice for all of us.

Well, I'm stunned. At the Munich Security Conference, VPOTUS JD Vance just verbally pushed in the faces of the globalist kikes destroying the West (in a room literally FILLED with many of them; the video cuts to these shocked & sour-faced miscreants was priceless lol). I could say much more about this important speech, but I'll just let you decide for yourself, Anons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HurEsyhrQV4 >=== -minor edit

>>36973 Thanks, Grommet! Cheers, Anon. :^)

So I know large building use liquid filled slosh dampener to help prevent them from swaying in the wind. Could we use the same principle to help with balance? We could use whiskey for the slosh fluid and store it in the robowaifu's breasts to keep the design both aesthetically pleasing and practical! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DrAMcSf6TH0 https://www.theburningofrome.com/advices/what-is-a-slosh-damper/

>>36994 This is a topic in general that Kiwi brought up our first year. An inverted-pendulum mass (I think my add is that mass should be our robowaifu's batteries) swaying about inside the torso -- in timing with the hips -- during walking is a really good idea. Good thinking, Anon! :^) >We could use whiskey for the slosh fluid and store it in the robowaifu's breasts to keep the design both aesthetically pleasing and practical! Lel. Not the first time hootch-booba have been suggested here, I can tell you! :D >=== -minor edit

>>36994 >Slosh based inertial dampening / tuned mass damper There are many complications for such systems which vary tremendously by the working fluid, damped springs, fluid control surfaces, etc... As Chobitsu mentions, >>36998 I've been researching this for awhile. Here are the pros and cons of slosh damping relative to solid mass damping in a mobile robot. Pros: Simplicity: Slosh dampers can be a simple sealed box. Just 3D print a box with tuned infill, fill it with fluid, and secure it. Easy testing: Just add fluid until it works. Can have fun designs: Jiggly bobs and buns can dampen unwanted vibrations. Cons: Frequency response: Fluid dynamics become chaotic at high frequencies. Leakage: Alterations to quantity of fluid alter resonance frequency. Leaks can damage other parts. Mass: This fluid adds mass to the system, whereas solid tuned mass damping can use batteries or some other integral parts mass. Worth investigating how well fluid filled breasts and butt would work. 3D printing a mold with engineered channels to allow her breasts to feel good to squeeze whilst effectively damping unwanted oscillations would be a fun challenge.

>>37013 What if you used some sort of high-viscosity gel or something for the booba? Also what about the literal fake booba (silicone implants) roasties are so enamored with? >leakage I think this is a very-high priority design issue to address. Double walled containers at least?

>>37016 Sure, make a normal silicone breast shell, fill it with silicone and silicone oil to inhibit curing to get an easy gel filled breast. Fake oppai rely on silicone bags of saline, or silicone bags of silicone gel. I will always suggest silicone gel because it's inert relative to electronics. I'd put a low density filler in it. but, I'm obsessed with min-maxing every detail. >Double walled container Sealing the silicone shell with silicone is good enough for medial applications, should be good enough for us. Learning about cosmetic surgery in school is finally paying off. :^)

Chobitsu did you change your mind about creating a forum like [redacted], incels.is or looksmax.org, but about robowaifus? If you don't do it someone else is gonna do it sooner or later, since it's the next stage of the whitepill. What is the whitepill? it's a series of ideologies for men that become more popular each day, here is the list: 1-Bluepill (1995-2005): Proto-light bluepill: (1995-2000)(Alt.support.shyness forum created in 1988)("socially anxious men") Light bluepill: (2000-2005)(Alana's Involuntary Celibacy Project site created in either 1993 or 1997)("Invcels") Proto-heavy bluepill: (1995-2000)(alt.seduction.fast forum created in 1994)("AFC" meaning "average frustrated chump") Heavy bluepill: (2000-2005)(The Yahoo support group /groups/loveshy-drgilmartin created in 2002)("Love shy men") 2-Redpill (2005-2015): Proto-light redpill: (2005-2010)(Incelsite.com/IncelSupport forum created in 2004)("IncelSupporters") Light redpill: (2010-2015)(the subreddit r/ForeverAlone created in 2010)("Foreveraloners") Proto-heavy redpill: (2005-2010)(Love-shy.com forum created in 2003)("shy boys") Heavy redpill: (2010-2015)(Puahate.com forum created in 2009 and Sluthate.com between 2014-2015 due to ER shooting)("LMSers") 3-Blackpill (2015-2025): Proto-light blackpill: (2015-2020)(incel subreddits created around 2015)("involuntary celibates") Light blackpill: (2020-2025)(incels.is forum created in 2017)("Incels") Proto-heavy blackpill: (2015-2020)(Lookism.net forum created in 2014 or 2015)("PSLers") Heavy blackpill: (2020-2025)(Looksmax.org forum created in 2018)("Looksmaxers") 4-Whitepill (2025-2035): Proto light whitepill: (2025-2030) anti-relationships or anti-marriage subreddit (the original r/MGTOW subreddit gets unbanned around 2027.5) or forum that has the topic of normal mgtow. Light whitepill: (2030-2035) Unbanned normal Mgtow subreddit that practices monk-mode mgtow, or new subreddit called Monk-Mode MGTOW. Proto-heavy whitepill: (2025-2030) robowaifu forum. Heavy whitepill: (2030-2035) robowaifu subreddit (or new robowaifu forum). Basically most of the users from incels.is and looksmax.org are tired of being incels and looksmaxers, most hate their forums now, soon the incels will become mgtows and looksmaxers will become robowaifuers. That's the reason why i believe you should create a robowaifu forum, they are starting to leave those places because they want to change to the whitepill due to hypergamy increasing, i come from those forums. What i described above is the manosphere, it grows every day because most children are now are being born with level 1 autism due to women only having children after their 30s. I can explain more about the blackpill and whitepill if you want. >=== -rm hotlinks

>>37029 me nan takes pills she in a mental asylum

>>37029 Hi Laroi, welcome! No I haven't changed my position about why we focus on IBs. * As to your suggestion, that 'someone else is gonna do it sooner or later' , more power to them!! :^) I'm not at all opposed to other Anons spreading out and creating robowaifu forums of all sort...in fact I relish the idea! There's literally no reason for me to "head up" some other forum. My thinking is pretty straightforward on this, Anon: a) I'm no one special (in fact I'm quite mid in most respects). I was simply the guy that said >"Welp, be the future you want to see, I guess..." and then made a simple step of faith in that direction. b) If such a thing (a robowaifuist movement) is truly organic then it will succeed all on it's own, whether I participate or no. c) IMHO, we are all already past the 'event horizon' for robowaifus to come into existence now. It's simply a matter of time at this point. I and others here could all disappear tomorrow and the Robowaifu Age will still happen at this point. It's simply inevitable, all else being equal. Simple as. <---> Thanks for the great pills breakdown, Anon! I anticipate that practically every segment of all the world's societies will take the robowaifu-pill in one form or fashion, and I don't think it will be long! Baste China is clearly going to lead the charge in this arena. I can only hope somehow that the cooler heads of sound men's minds will prevail in the West, and allow this unprecedentedly-large industry to move forward here as well! Cheers. :^) --- * --->Why we exist on an imageboard, and not some other forum platform ( >>15638, >>31158 )

>>37033 You haven't really had much success with ib, the threads on 4chan get deleted because of spam, don't you think that it would be a lot better to get users from incels.is and loooksmax.org? most of the users there hate women and are racist like 4channers because they also have level 1 autism like them (this is the difference between reddit and 4chan). I'm just telling that it's a gold mine of users.

>>37034 >You haven't really had much success with ib I abandoned 4cuck posting a decade ago. Today the restrictions there are far-more laughable IMO, and it's clear that glowniggers & passholders are about the only ones who can have a consistent """conversation""". Don't get me wrong, I seriously applaud the Anons who 'fight the good fight' there and keep getting banned for all their troubles. The robowaifu threads there have played an important role IMO in the propaganda efforts for robowaifus. As I indicated above -- they have already succeeded at that effort! Robowaifuism is a thing now, and it's not going to go away by any amount of kike/libsh*te/roastie/simpoid reeeing. So good job, every'non -- glad we ourselves got to play our part in it!! :^) >don't you think that it would be a lot better to get users from incels.is and loooksmax.org I wouldn't say "better" necessarily, but as to them participating towards this common goal? Absolutely. <---> >I'm just telling that it's a gold mine of users. I believe it! Please get going on it, Anon. Honestly. But I only sh*tepost anonymously across Tor, and this is literally about the only bastion of free speech available to Anons to do so. You'll know where to find us, Anon. Cheers. :^)

>>37035 Don't you see how successful [redacted] is? if 4chan is over how are you gonna get users for this ib? The Subafrican owner of incels.is and looksmax.org makes loads of money each day just because he was able to take over the forums created by the user SergeantIncel, here is a video of him (the video is about other forum about suicides that he used to own): https://youtu.be/VPNM1_jKbbs?t=373 He even owns an incel wiki that is similar to robowaifu.tech: https://incels.wiki/w/Main_Page You could take over most of his community since most now hate the blackpill. >=== -rm hotlinks

>>37036 >Don't you see how successful [redacted] is? I do! That's why I'm asking you to take the reins with this one, Anon. :^) >The Subafrican owner of incels.is and looksmax.org makes loads of money Simply not a business model I'm interested in, and quite frankly it couldn't hold a candle to even a modestly-successful robowaifu industry venture in the future. I suggest that route instead for any Anons here rn (either as entrepreneurs themselves, or as R&D engineers & scientists there, or simply as general assembly staff, etc.) BTW, what's a 'Subafrican'? :D >You could take over most of his community Please send them here. >since most now hate the blackpill. This point is by far the best part of your posts, Anon! The fact that men the world over are breaking the (((conditioning))), and realizing that the current Western status-quo is not only not reasonable or necessary -- but is downright evil. This is surely one of the most important sociological breakthroughs of this era. >tl;dr Giving men hope & a future is literally why this "forum" exists here. Please help them all take the Whitepill, Anon. We all have our part to play, yeah? Cheers. :^) TWAGMI >=== -fmt, minor edit -rm hotlinks

>>37040 You didn't answer my question about how you are gonna get users for this place now.

>>37041 It's never been a topic I focused much upon (I'm hardly a salesman, lol). We as a group however, have a couple of propaganda threads on the topic (cf. >>36623, >>2705 ). Please do contribute in them.

>>37042 I don't do a forum because i'm busy with my anthropology research. What i suggest you should do is buy a [redacted] license [redacted], and put small censored sex doll or Ai gf ads to pay for the forum, then we get some users from 4chan and then we start an recruitment attack on incels.is and looksmax.org with that small army, then our numbers would grow exponentially. Here are the boards that i think the forum should have: 1-Robowaifu research board 2-Sex dolls and robotic sex dolls board 3-VR and AR Ai girlfriends board 4-Porn gaming board 5-Whitepill board 6-Gaming board 7-Off topic board >=== -rm rec

>>37045 >anthropology research. same, find out what happened during the bronze age collapse, theres literally nothing on it, im pretty confident from literature and language similarities centuries after the fact that the ruling and/or educated class just fucked off for some reason, one group going west and the other east (they abandoned the palaces as the other civs called it), leaving behind only the rural illiterate masses that couldnt even figure out how to make even copper tools, but theres no account of it really outside of the impossible similarities with the mycenaeans in places like rome and the indus valley centuries later and they shouldnt even know anything about them until the hellenistic period yet they have 'we wuz da og greeks' stories and they have their own similar stories that are basically just the illiad which turned out to have some historical basis and outside of the myth making was probably a real event, so maybe they were right and werent just obsessed with them for no reason trying to emulate everything they did, maybe they really were just another branch, or maybe not who knows

>>37047 Based on DNA tests Europe and the middle east used to be full of quadroons, the people that the natufians and yamnaya replaced didn't look like fully europeans. We can see a bit of their physical traits on celts, Icelanders, sicilians, sardinia and southwestern iberia, basically octoroons.

>>37048 >We can see a bit of their physical traits i dont see it they obviously had boats, any coastal cities along the mediterranean would have had contact with north africa by that time, north african traits are the same as just mediterranean, carthage egypt tyrrhenian etc are african but thats not the bantu africans of sub saharan africa that most people think of when you say african

>>37049 Eurasians have a maxillary depth angle of 90, far western europeans have one of 91.25, north africans have one of 92.5, centralsouth africans have one of 100. For example the Japanese have around 12.5% aboriginal DNA, the aboriginals were proto or paleo west eurasians.

>>37027 Thanks, Kiwi! >Learning about cosmetic surgery in school is finally paying off. :^) Heh. My interest in medical as well. Cheers.

/robowaifu/ Have you ever encountered a supernatural entity?

>>37053 Speaking personally, Sure! His name is Jesus Christ. As the Creator of all beings, He's number one!! :D Accept no substitutes!

>>37016 >high-viscosity gel or something for the booba I don't know if this would work but maybe perlite with vegetable oil. Perlite is cheap and would provide a viscous resistance to the oil. Add in a tablespoon of twenty mule team borax to prevent rot. Silicon woud be better but $$$$.

I very upset by the leading sentence on the site. "Advancing robotics to a point where anime catgrill meidos in tiny miniskirts are a reality." No mention at all of Foxgirls! A huge travesty! Foxgirls are far cuter than cat girls. https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F04dd70vnrl041.png :)

>>37042 I don't like that you delete my mention of [redacted], you are not gonna lose money for mentioning them. Maybe this will make you change your mind; in this thread i explain that female hypergamy is growing exponentially and most people are also being born with level 1 autism now: https://neets.net/threads/the-behavioral-sink-on-humans-thread-version-1-1.39107/ I also have other thread where i explain why we will have android robots by 2032, but i think i already showed it to you in the past. >=== -rm recs

>>37061 >I don't like that you delete my mention of ---, --- and the cheaper ---, you are not gonna lose money for mentioning them. Lol. Always about the money with you, Anon. I assure you, no money is being made here. This is an amateur, anonymous, DIY "workshop" board -- we're all just here to brainstorm, share information, prognosticate, help & encourage one another while working on our robowaifu-oriented projects together. :^) Anyway, I'll gatekeep this board as I see fit; I'm generally quite upfront about it whenever I do. Same goes for Kiwi. I hope you can deal with that; its definitely nothing personal Anon, just looking out for the board's & Anon's interests here. <---> Regardless, thanks for your insights & encouragements. I hope you do well with your Anthro studies, and that you manage somehow to do something positive with that. Sure & certain that field is in need of a LARGE dose of good things! Cheers, Laroi. :^) >=== -prose edit

>>37060 >Foxgrils Pfft, you silly kitsunes...every'non knows wuffgrils a best! :DD <awooos over a fresh bushel basket of apples* >=== -minor edit

I'm not seeing some kind of thread suited to Robowaifu Motion Planning, or am I missing it? It seems to me this is a very-important topic, and one that is kind of general as well. That is, we need to plan the motions of: -the robowaifu herself (as a unified system), through say, Anon's flat -the robowaifu's arms & other (internal/onboard) skellington components, as she's going about her day-to-day tasks -other 'objects' in motion around the robowaifu (say, of Anon himself), for her predictive planning purposes. <---> What got me thinking about this need was trying to figure out where to post this link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8D7vpR9WCtw Making Hard C++ Tests Easy: A Case Study From the Motion Planning Domain - Chip Hogg - CppCon 2024 >If you've ever struggled to write tests for domain-specific functions with complicated, real-world inputs, this talk is for you! We'll use the Motion Planning component in a self-driving stack as a case study (although you won't need any prior Motion Planning experience to follow the talk). In building objects for our test inputs, we faced the classic dilemma. If we make the objects simple, they're hardly meaningful, and the tests amount to little more than smoke tests. If we try constructing more realistic objects, it takes tremendous amounts of boilerplate code (which obscures what is actually being tested) --- and what's worse, these finicky construction methods go stale and break easily as implementation details evolve. >There is a better way! To find it, we take our inspiration from a (paraphrased) Kent Beck quote: "First, make the test easy. (Warning: this may be hard!) Then, write the easy test." What this means is investing in full-fledged testing support libraries. First, we build foundational domain-specific APIs: user-friendly paths, poses, and speed profiles. Then, we provide APIs that bridge the gap between what the user pictures in their head when they want to write a test (a "scene"), and the data structures that represent that situation in the software (a sequence of planner input messages on different channels). This "scene description" that the user writes is high level and doesn't depend on implementation details, so it resists going stale, as we'll illustrate with an example involving road construction zones. On the implementation side, the problem decomposes beautifully: each planner input (map, actors, etc.) can be constructed from the information in the scene description, independently of all other inputs, helped along by the paths and speed profiles. >These ideas could be implemented in many languages, but C++ particularly excels at delivering performance, robustness, and flexible, natural APIs. As an example, we'll explain the benefits of describing each planner input with a "smart" tag type, containing both the name and the message type. On the implementation side, variadic templates make it easy to conjure up containers and interfaces that operate on "all planner inputs", eliminating the risk of forgetting to update some callsite when we add a new one. On the interface side, end users see none of this complexity: they can simply use instances of these tag types as "indexes" into these containers in a natural way. This fluency and power makes more complicated test cases possible: it becomes easy to select and "tweak" any planner input to ensure we respond correctly when the messages are malformed, delayed, or absent. Overall, we hope our experience enabling high-quality Motion Planning testing at scale will have lessons that can be adapted to a variety of other domains. <---> I thought about using our systems engineering bread : ( >>98 ), b/c solving this certainly involves making a lot of different 'moving parts' work successfully together. I thought about our self-driving car bread : ( >>112 ), for obvious reasons. I briefly considered just using the C++ bread(s) for this, since it's definitely a 'real-time performance needs' set of engineering tasks. I also thought of our 'Newton's Dance' bread : ( >>7777 ). :^) Ideas? Am I missing something here Anons? >=== -minor edit