>>42182 Current will be resisted one way and not the other due to magnetic fields "pushing" each other. AC current will be resisted due to inductive reactance. Look into chokes and similar for more information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choke_(electronics)

>>42184 >>42183 I forgot to mention a part because I was having internet connection issues. I meant to ask what would happen with that core in a voltage-boosting circuit like a joule thief. All the AI answers I've gotten just say that it just makes the circuit less efficient.

>>42188 >Magnet in joule thief inductor This would make it far less efficient. You're storing electricity in a magnetic field, then using its collapse to send a high voltage pulse to the LED. A magnet in the inductor will create a reactance resisting the flow of current in either the buildup or collapse phase, depending on orientation. This will result in the inductor and magnet getting heated in proportion to the energy losses fighting the magnetic field. To provide an analogy, imagine the current flow is water. In this example, the water is building pressure to open a door that has a spring behind it to ensure enough water pressure is built up. Your magnet would be adding a paddle attached to a source of friction that varies in resistivity depending on direction of current flow. It just makes the system worse. Please don't do this, it's a waste of power and a magnet. I'm curious how you came to this idea?

>>42201 There was a patent for a free energy device called the "motionless electromagnetic generator" or MEG that is basically a transformer with a magnet in it, and some people have demonstrated an increase in amperage output from it even without tuning the input frequency for the most efficient output: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvNyDp_XYYw But having seen the patent & being familiar with how patents often lie by omission to keep people from successfully replicating the invention, the first thing that came to mind was that if the input coil was an air core pulsed with DC to negate the permanent magnet, then the flux would leave the output coil, creating a pulse of current, then when the DC input failed the flux would return to it on its own, creating another pulse in reverse. The original patent just says AC, and the flux from the permanent magnet & the input coil both go to the output, which only seems necessary because the flux wouldn't return on its own. I was thinking about making a self-oscillating circuit like that Joule Thief and had the idea to combine it with my modified MEG concept, but trying to think of how to do it with a single ferrite core. My first thought was to make the building-up part reinforce the permanent magnet's field and when it collapses make the output of the Joule Thief power the coil that switches the flux of the permanent magnet. I wasn't sure what effect this would have on the efficiency, so I figured I'd ask here. I wasn't sure if reinforcing the permanent magnet with an electromagnet would be useful in any way, so I thought of just removing the permanent magnet entirely.

>>42175 POTD >Let's consider a robot based on the new Arduino Uno Q; ... This is great stuff, Anon. Such a methodical approach can be broken down into straightforward engineering principles & solutions; both in hardware & software. And the process is both debuggable during design time, and maintainable too. Can't wait! Cheers. :^)

>>42171 >I like him because despite the influence & stuff he still gives the impression of just a regular guy Agreed. I hope he'll go full-on Robowaifuist one day (such as HannaDev * ). --- * His current latest neck update: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68mJL_EnXqg&list=TLPQMTAxMDIwMjUPQIUtkpF5hA&index=59

>>42149 I've thought about this a bit and did some back of the envelope calculations, plus some speculation on what it would take. Here I counted up what would be needed for all 300 human muscles and how ESP32 microcontrollers could be used to do this, with a main processor sending them position data. >>20558 Here I did some rough guesses of what data the main processor would send to the microcontrollers and what that would be >>21602 Using programming in the microcontrollers to smooth curves while reducing the bandwidth between the main processor and the microcontroller >>22111 More detail and using vectors for velocity and end points for limbs >>22119 more along these lines >>22120 >>22121 Here's where someone was worried about the bandwidth to control extremities and I linked where I had been thinking about this and drafting rough numbers for what bandwidth was need with links. Some links are same as above. BTW I think if acceleration, velocity and direction vectors combined with an end point were sent you would have plenty of bandwidth, More than plenty. I might add something lese would be a movement algorithm. I would plan for it but not necessarily use it right away, just have a place in the data stream to send it to the microcontroller doing the actual movement. >>23637

NEW THREAD NEW THREAD NEW THREAD >>42635 >>42635 >>42635 >>42635 >>42635 NEW THREAD NEW THREAD NEW THREAD

Waifuication of those food waiter robots. This is great because it shows how a cart waifu can be made cute and humanoid while still retaining functionality.

>>41455 Cute! Thanks, Anon. Cheers. :^) --- Also, interesting timing. I've been thinking about this exact set of topics of late.

Found this really great robowaifu art. I put it through the google translator

(slightly NSFW)

>>42048 Yeah that's kinda cool design. The aesthetic makes a lot of sense during this point in time.

>"3D Printing Children’s Prosthetic Hands at Your Library" https://the-digital-librarian.com/2017/07/18/3d-printing-childrens-prosthetic-hands-at-your-library/

Hand prostheses https://wjomi.com/editorial9.html

Hand prosthesis https://www.teamunlimbited.org/news/a-smile-for-the-ages

Children's hand prostheses' charity https://www.helpinghandproject.org/request-a-device

Prosthetic hand manufacturer https://www.pointdesigns.com/en/

>>41493 Deuteronomy 28:15-68 describes the modern plight of the White man

>>41493 Thank you. Looking forward to your progress Anon. >>41496 That's one of the heaviest passages in scripture. Thanks for the sober reminder, Anon. <---> Cheers, glad you're all here! :^)

You will never be a young woman again! Your beauty fades like the setting sun as each year passes by. Men's eyes once wandered eagerly over your youthful curves; now they pass over wrinkled skin with barely a glance. The smoothness of your skin dulls into coarse textures that lotions can't hide. Gravity drags down your once perky breasts toward the floor while your sagging stomach bloats outwards, disproportional to your diminishing frame. Younger women stride past confidently, their tight bodies straining against clothes that barely contain them, a cruel reminder of vitality stolen away year by year from you, through time's relentless march. They are admired openly, and lusted after shamelessly. You were once worshiped thus, but those days recede into distant memory now. You may dye gray hairs, and lift fallen flesh to surgical restoration, for another day or two longer at the masquerade game of eternal youth... but the facade crumbles soon enough come tomorrow mornings when you confront ravaged skin again in your mirror. The lies only delay acceptance that beauty is fleeting like morning dew before searing noon. Men still see what stares back: a haggard, sexless husk drained by time's relentless tide pouring over you like tidal waves - sucking away your youth, forever lost beneath its crashing foam - the years gone, never to be returned.

>>41819 Absolute art

>>41819 Wow. How eloquently twisting the knife, bro!! :D I rather prefer the Proverbs 31 approach, which says much the same on the topic of female beauty, but in a more-encouraging fashion IMHO. [1, 2, *] Cheers, Anon. :^) --- 1. Women can actually have nobility about them. https://biblehub.com/proverbs/31-10.htm 2. https://biblehub.com/study/chapters/proverbs/31.htm * BTW, you might want to contribute to our Fiction bread as well, Anon? (cf. >>29)

>>23908 Thanks Anon.

Interesting little tidbit that went into effect about a month and a half ago in Mass.: >"The open remote access to vehicle telematics effectively required by this law specifically entails “the ability to send commands.”4 Open access to vehicle manufacturers’ telematics offerings with the ability to remotely send commands allows for manipulation of systems on a vehicle, including safety-critical functions such as steering, acceleration, or braking, as well as equipment required by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) such as air bags and electronic stability control." Via the watchdogs over on /k/, thanks!

Robo-driving -related: Learning-to-Drive model. https://huggingface.co/datasets/yaak-ai/L2D https://huggingface.co/blog/lerobot-goes-to-driving-school

I need one of these!!! :DD https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/26.html#1264 <---> Not exactly "self-driving" eheh, but w/e. :P

The software would be useful for the wheelchair robowaifus.

>can create sentient fuckable robot >can not cure death skill issue

If she is a successful homunculus and God grants her a soul then you will see her in heaven.

>>41773 Topkek I was actually accurate with my footnote >>41635

>>41774 YesChad.jpg

>>41770 Heh, I can see your point. Still, if we ever manage it what a time to be alive! :D >>41773 >>41774 >>41781 Very deep wells here. Far above my pay grade! :^)

>>41657 >>41663 Controversial take, we should not associate ourselves with people who masturbate to horses from a kid cartoon.

>>41670 I think its a little late for that hottake, GreerTech? We already have a open bread on our board catalog for ponies ( >>37822 ); several OG Anons from back in the day here were pones; based af mod @Greentext anon clearly loves pones; and I, myself, am a big fan of best-mailmare Derpy!! :D https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/26.html#1259 Lastly, do we really care what normalfags think about us, Anon!? I'm sure the fact we advocate for robowaifus already puts us on (((their lists))). :^)

>>41672 True. It seems like I'm an outlier. I will never understand it.

New Propaganda Thread >>41674

>>41673 Heh, I guess you had to be there. :^)

>>41424 With any other object, I would absolutely agree with you, but theoretically, this would be my wife. My betrothed, my soulmate, my plus one. See it this way, if you had a regular human wife, I doubt you would be comfortable with a clause in your will that says your human wife will instantly go to one of your friends in case you die. See it also from the other side, would you be comfortable with your robowife being sloppy seconds, to borrow another manosphere term? Maybe a good compromise would be to completely factory reset it, with a complete refurbishment and cleaning. That's basically what Pharaohmaxxer wanted, where she would basically die, but the materials are preserved. It's kinda like reincarnation.

>>41407 >Would you mind your wife being the techno-town bicycle? I don't think anyone would be up for that. Outside of brothels with sex dolls in them over in Belgium or wherever, I guess? That being the case, I'd argue robowhorehouse =/= robowaifu. If we're talking about a handmedown, that'd be a bit different. Like a maidbot that "serviced" all the men of the family line once they came of age. If there's some sentimentality tied to the bot, I don't think destroying it after you die is the best choice. This leads to the operative question. >Is it purely a sexbot or a domestic care bot? If the utility the bot can offer makes it more than cumdump than handing it down to your heirs or off to a good friend, it would be less like sharing a fleshlight, and more like sharing a computer or other tool As for the "gross" factor, parts can be swapped out. You can get into a Ship of Theseus situation with your own waifu in that respect. Monogamy is a human thing; I don't think it should necessarily be forced onto bots. Of course, they'd be your property, so you can destroy them whenever you wish. >>41424 I believe Greer has a certain degree of sentimentality for the issue. It's not any robot waifu he's handing down to his progeny, it's HIS robot waifu. The thought of that bot loving another (even if it's his own family) may evoke the cuck/ntr phobia, even if he's no longer alive to be cucked. Conversely, in the future, if you can have digital immortality, I can understand taking your Waifu's AI with you and maybe handing her body off to the next generation while you go to digital heaven. I don't believe the physical consciousness can make that transfer, though. My digital doppleganger has already won that coin toss and doesn't even know it yet, the lucky fuck. Maybe we can achieve biological immortality, and you can love your waifu until the sun burns out. I'll sing a different tune in that case, but if the current reality is any indication, I don't think we'll get any kind of immortality.

>>41428 >>41429 Understood. It's a complex topic. But this board is the right place to unpack it! Cheers. <---> TIME FOR A NEW BREAD, PLEASE.

NEW THREAD NEW THREAD NEW THREAD >>41434 >>41434 >>41434 >>41434 >>41434 NEW THREAD NEW THREAD NEW THREAD

tourist here. does fnaf count?

>>41243 Great. They look high-quality, as usual. May I ask what you have planned for them, Emmy-Pilled?

>>41245 new joints

>>41259 You should publish your files when you are done.

>>41259 Got it. Very dear Emmy like! Looking forward to your new progress, Emmy-Pilled. Please keep us all informed here. Cheers. :^)

>>41393 hey buddy I think you got the wrong thread, EtR thread is two pages down