So, I recognize both why the GPL exists, and why Anons would argue for its use. OTOH, I also (very much) recognize why permissive licenses like BSD/MIT exist, and why I and others argue for its use.
Question:
I've seen several opensauce projects released under a 'Dual-License' scheme, which apparently lets the user pick which one they want to adopt. While, IIRC, these were all some variant of the restrictive (eg, GPL-esque) license approach, why couldn't we release all our code here as both restrictive & non-restrictive licenses (ie, GPL3 or MIT -- you choose)?
<--->
And if this does indeed turn out to be a legitimate approach, what does Anon think the effects would be? Please discuss.
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 05/10/2025 (Sat) 15:07:24.