>>44215
>It is sensible, a rolling box with an upper body that adjusts up or down is likely the min-maxed configuration.
I think it probably is too.
>Reduction in needed computation is another major win for this configuration. Less kinematic and balancing equations.
I would add to that list "more manufacturable" as well. (At least for the 'boxy' parts of the design.)
>Been mulling ideas of her body being detachable from her sturdy base as needed.
Yeah, I'd kinda come to the same conclusion with this one addition: interchangeable 'snuggly' lower half
for cuddlin' & stuff. :)
If you recall our discourse with
@Lin Lin, where are you? (
>>24744, et al), we had the idea of a universal 'connection block' to attach various 'torsos' to the rolling base.
>Currently considering her "body" being an ultralight structure with just enough articulation to accomplish simple things. Her "base" essentially being the main robot, where all her strength and mobility would be hidden away.
I think this is a very-rational approach rn, Kiwi. Godspeed & cheers. :)
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 04/07/2026 (Tue) 15:49:54.