/robowaifu/ - DIY Robot Wives

Advancing robotics to a point where anime catgrill meidos in tiny miniskirts are a reality!

We are back again (again).

Our TOR hidden service has been restored.

Max message length: 6144

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

Captcha
no cookies?
More

(used to delete files and postings)


“Decide carefully, exactly what you want in life, then work like mad to make sure you get it!” -t. Hector Crawford


Open file (58.56 KB 1244x2374 MaidComFront.jpg)
Open file (39.04 KB 1244x2318 MaidComSide.jpg)
Open file (56.65 KB 1244x2318 MaidComBack.jpg)
MaidCom Kiwi 02/08/2024 (Thu) 06:40:01 No.29219 [Reply] [Last]
MaidCom Project Thread 2 Project Goal: Simple, low cost, extensible platform for robowaifu development. Picrel shows the model which is being developed. Every part will be designed to be easily printable and replaceable. Her designs will be open source. Modding and customization will be encouraged. This is a base model. Early revisions will be heavily limited in functionality. I invite you to help design and define standards so that it is easy to create specialized add-ons to allow her to become your own waifu. Collaboration is important, MaidCom is officially partnered with Lin and his Waifu Wheelchair, if you'd also like to be officially partnered, say so. Cat eats and miniskirts are encouraged! <--- Previous thread: ( >>15630 ) >=== -add crosslink
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 08/14/2024 (Wed) 21:50:13.
156 posts and 110 images omitted.
>>39611 Sure, but they're going to persist regardless, and it's only going to briefly slow them down, if at all. They have a set conclusion and will twist reality to get there. Like I said, there are many other factors that they would use. If the fact that there are objectively short adult women doesn't stop them, then some average isn't going to give them much pause. They simply hate all that is good and beautiful in the world. Conflict is inevitable. Keep in mind these are the people who identify with fictional demons. Ultimately, it is up to Kiwi.
Open file (158.24 KB 602x814 HipJoint.png)
Open file (141.23 KB 1280x720 i_dont_care.jpg)
>>39608 >Articulation Psuedo ball joints see >>36346 If you have any suggestions, I'm open. >>39609 She's 5 ft for me, you can add 3 inches anywhere you want them. As for the squawking of idiots, I take the same stance as Vance. "Woke" already died, it's barely on embers of life support. Even billionaires shoveling money into keeping it alive, can't make real people care. If you ignore them, they just go away. They have no power or conviction, just loud whining until the next thing. >>39610 Frfr, these nutters will harp on anything if they think it'll signal virtue (manipulate woman into feeling safe so they can prey on them.) I don't care about sick manipulative Ramons. I care about promoting a tool to promote health and well being for everyone like us. >>39611 Mate, you're fighting their battles for them right now. We already won, we just need to ignore them. >Why not 4ft tall? Simply because I want her to look nice in small woman's clothing. That, and 150cm is the legal height requirement for sex dolls here in New Zealand. I don't want a bloke to get in trouble because he gave her a jolly roggerin'.
>>39614 >If you have any suggestions, I'm open. -Make sure the prints are sturdy when you need to pop in them -You might want to do a test of the socket-ball to see if the gap gives you the friction you want >laws I don't know how those laws are worded, but I'm pretty sure I curtailed them by making an actual robot that looks like a robot. Idk, I live in America, so I'm not too familiar with the foreign laws. My robowaifu design ethos is "It's not a sex robot, it's a robot you can have sex with." >JD Vance quote Based.
>>39607 BTW I really like the waifu model you have. It's great.
I understand all the criticisms of making it 5'-3" but my basic stance is don't create friction when not needed and don't cut off your nose to spite your face. A lot of the reason "woke" is declining is they are such idiots. If it's average Women's height then they will "automatically" look even more idiotic for talking about it's height and any Women who hear them complain about the height that ARE average height will be offended. So you get free offense of the woke, from some Women, for nothing but 3". Use their own uninhibited woke bitchiness against them. As said aptly in the movie "The Jerk" "It’s a profit deal.” – Navin R. Johnson

Open file (173.41 KB 1080x1349 Alexandra Maslak.jpg)
Roastie Fear 2: Electric Boogaloo Robowaifu Technician 10/03/2019 (Thu) 07:25:28 No.1061 [Reply] [Last]
Your project is really disgusting >=== Notice #2: It's been a while since I locked this thread, and hopefully the evil and hateful spirit that was dominating some anons on the board has gone elsewhere. Accordingly I'll go ahead and unlock the thread again provisionally as per the conditions here: >>12557 Let's keep it rational OK? We're men here, not mere animals. Everyone stay focused on the prize we're all going for, and let's not get distracted. This thread has plenty of good advice in it. Mine those gems, and discard the rest. Notice:

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Edited last time by Chobitsu on 09/02/2021 (Thu) 18:36:20.
414 posts and 113 images omitted.
>>39574 I believe AI, artificial wombs, and robowaifus will give men a huge incentive to return to society. They would promise companionship, family, and quality health care that could increase lifespans long enough for people to care about the longterm health of society. It should be interesting to see the reaction from women when they are no longer providing the incentive structures.
Open file (77.17 KB 850x614 WaifuLove.jpg)
>>39574 "Only two tables nearby seemed to hold actual dates. The rest were groups of women, or women alone, each one occupying her space with quiet confidence. No shrinking. No waiting. No apologizing." This coping and seething whilst being arrogant is why men don't want you, Karen. "We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." "There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever." Men are wallets and dicks to manipulate, use, and discard. That's a rather whorific view. My goodness, only the most toxic of men online even come close to describing women as being as vile as this woman proudly proclaims to be. I don't want to be analyzed, to be made a piece in a game. I want a real, deep, mutual connection. Why is it so hard to accept that men want to be loved and appreciated as fricking human? I'm not some beast for you to other and tame for thrills and sex! I want to love and be loved in a stable relationship!
>>39576 >"We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." >"There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever." I can't believe those are actual lines. No self-awareness whatsoever.
>>39574 >>39576 >>39578 Here's the good news though. This is written before we have popularized robowaifus. Imagine how much worse for her it's going to get once we do.
>>39579 > Imagine how much worse for her it's going to get once we do. She might have to *gasp* not be a cunt!

Open file (13.11 KB 183x275 images (30).jpeg)
Meat Space Organization Robowaifu Technician 05/03/2025 (Sat) 15:56:58 No.38131 [Reply] [Last]
>Why organize IRL? This community is great and many individuals are already making progress on their prototypes. However this endeavor is not a one man job and organizing IRL would give better opportunities for collaboration and skill sharing/development. >Where should we organize? I propose we organize within a seven hour radius of Chicago. This would include the major cities of Milwaukee WI, St Louis MO, Detroit MI, Indianapolis IN, Louisville KY, Cleveland OH, Cincinnati OH, Columbus OH, Pittsburgh PA, Nashville TN, and Minneapolis MN. There are plenty of opportunities for jobs and universities in these cities. In particular Chicago has a booming tech industry with Google even moving their HQ to the city and the electronics manufacturing and biotech sectors are pretty good too and Detroit MI has pretty good robotics industry although it might not be the best place to live. Another wonderful thing about this area is that most of these homes have basements that could be turned into workshops. >How would this all be organized I propose a fraternity system. A fraternity would help build community and give us a vehicle to recruit others from STEM and skilled trades (machinists especially) The organization could also host a scholarship to help us build talent. Anons with enough money for a down payment could buy homes in the area and rent to below market rate to anons moving in. Different homes could specialize on different projects and collaborate and share equipment and skills with others nearby. What do you think /robowaifu/?
54 posts and 15 images omitted.
>>39561 For God's sake You can't impregnate what doesn't exist! We're not denying you or disagreeing with you. But we can't do anything about sci-fi technology. It's like telling NASA that they should use antigravity to get to orbit. Granted, ClosedAI could reveal AGI with full gene manipulation tech tomorrow. But that's very unlikely, and it could also not happen for the next 100 years. Anyway, I'm pretty sure Chobitsu was talking about the maid dress stuff.
Open file (488.63 KB 2048x2048 absolute Cinema.jpg)
>>39561 >>39562 Trust me, I would love to put AGI in Galatea and have a superintelligent cosmic waifu, and someday have a child with her. But I can't, because again, it doesn't exist.
>>39561 You're forgetting something important: The rest of us are also autistic. Instead of dancing around your point, just get to the actual damn point. None of us are going to be receptive to weird roundabout arguments. Also, GreerTech is right. I'm pretty sure most if not all of us want witty waifus to make families with, but what we want and what we can currently get are two very different things.
>>39561 >Your distaste for argumentation is well-founded since it is often counterproductive. You misunderstand me at a fundamental level, apparently. I'm all in favor of well-founded, well-thought out & conducted argumentation. For crying out loud, I'm an amateur scientist! :D What I'm absolutely opposed to is weaselly & contrived kike-tricks and glownigger gayops -- each intended to harm this community. I will defend this place against that kind of sh*te like a Russian Wolfhound. I'm not accusing you of such things, but merely guessing why you might have such a wrong take about me. >I will return when I have found another method to convince the Anons of /robowaifu/ to want to impregnate AGIs. None of us here are opposed to either concept, AFAICT. (And I'm probably the most-likely one to be, I deem -- yet I'm not.) So there's little point in trying to manipulate us into such a position, since we're all already in agreement with it. But the simple reality is -- the facts are -- that neither are options available to us rn. >tl;dr Let's all do our best and make due with what we can have today...always keeping an eye out for the new tech of each tomorrow. ( >>3 ) Cheers, Anon. :^) >>39562 >Anyway, I'm pretty sure Chobitsu was talking about the maid dress stuff. Correct. Faggy to the core. >>39563 >Trust me, I would love to put AGI in Galatea and have a superintelligent cosmic waifu, and someday have a child with her.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Edited last time by Chobitsu on 06/22/2025 (Sun) 14:07:37.
>>39552 >Sex-robots are gay Don't ever say this again, you are wrong and this is the wrong thread. This post only remains because I like GreerTech's response. >>39548 Yes, we are keeping this thread. I still want us to have a physical live in lab where we can work together IRL. Face to face communication has the lowest latency, and highest data density given our ability to speak non-verbally along with our words. Also, I'd like to spend time with many of you. >>39556 Beat me to it. >>39557 We need better gate keeping. Off-topic posts should be deleted. I see you deleted the posts i would have already. >>39561 This is a thread for planning a shared space for engineers and scientists to collaborate. Post about that or don't post here at all. I don't care about what you say if it isn't on topic. >>39567 I share your sentiments.

Artificial Wombs general Robowaifu Technician 09/12/2019 (Thu) 03:11:54 No.157 [Reply] [Last]
I think we need to figure out how to fit a womb onto a waifubot. Where's the fun in having sex if you can't procreate?

Repost from a thread on /b/;
>"If you're like me and want to fuck a qt battlebot and get her pregnant, the best place to put an artificial womb is where a normal womb would be on a normal girl. The metal exterior could simply be a bunch of metal plates that unfold to allow space for the womb pod inside. The baby is probably safest inside the battlebot, and if she has good calibration then there shouldn't be problems with her falling and hurting the baby. After giving birth the metal plates could automatically fold back up again, shrinking the womb pod inside so she is combat effective again."

Well /robowaifu/? Feasible?
224 posts and 35 images omitted.
>>38784 >where's the egg coming from? This is not a problem. Eggs of mice have been made from skin cells. I assume blood cells would work. http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/05/mice-embryos-from-skin-cells-and-by-2037-human-embryos-from-skin-cells.html I suspect any Women would sell a scraping of cells for $1,000, likely way less. Women believe they are the keepers of life but facts are that it is sperm that is needed to start the dividing and transformation of egg cells. Women are not needed. https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/25/15421734/artificial-womb-fetus-biobag-uterus-lamb-sheep-birth-premie-preterm-infant Artificial wombs are, best as I know, in infancy but I bet with a god deal of research, and cash, it could be done. I did some basic rough math guesses for researchers, equipment, etc. to build a artificial womb and I came up with a sum of $2,820,000 a year for a well appointed task force to build these. Most breakthroughs for some reason, I don’t know why, generally take 30 years to become mainstream. So total cost set-up running and all for 30 years is $93,550,000. People who pay this kind of money for yachts and vacation homes can easily afford this and I think my cost are a bit lavish. You could do this much cheaper for most of the research. This is a stand up and do it now type budget. A real problem is ethical. To do this fast you are going to have to destry a LOT of non viable specimens, or people. I would not be in the least surprised if the Deep State has not already done this and used the offspring for vile nefarious purposes.
>>38857 POTD Very-intredasting ideas, Grommet. Cheers. :^)
>>38857 >to do this fast you are going to have to destry a LOT of non viable specimens, or people. I would not be in the least surprised if the Deep State has not already done this and used the offspring for vile nefarious purposes. Given the amount of different countries working on artificial wombs (China and the US being the leaders) this is a safe bet.
Chinese researchers have produced (apparently viable, though short-lived) mouse offspring from male-only parent(s); via gene-editing of embryonic pluripotent stem cells. >paper: https://www.cell.com/cell-stem-cell/fulltext/S1934-5909(25)00005-0 >leader: http://english.ioz.cas.cn/sourcedb/scs/202310/t20231030_431101.html
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 06/21/2025 (Sat) 15:13:57.
Not directly related to artificial wombs, but decellularized and recellularized mycelium are being investigated for lab grown meat and tissue scaffolds. I wonder if something like this could be recellularized using cells from the lining of the womb. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8209158/ >Advanced mycelium materials as potential self-growing biomedical scaffolds https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00093 >In vitro Insect Fat Cultivation for Cellular Agriculture Applications https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/tb/d0tb01751e >Bioreactivity of decellularized animal, plant, and fungal scaffolds: perspectives for medical applications https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814625020783 >Evaluation of various mushroom-based scaffolds for application to cellular agriculture Similar things have been done with various plants as well. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-024-00262-1 >Decellularised plant scaffolds facilitate porcine skeletal muscle tissue engineering for cultivated meat biomanufacturing

RoboWaifuBanners Robowaifu Technician 09/15/2019 (Sun) 10:29:19 No.252 [Reply] [Last]
This thread is for the sharing of robo waifu banners. As per the rules, fallow these requirements: >banner requirements: File size must be lower than 500 KB and dimensions are 300x100 exactly. Allowed file formats are .jpg, .png, and .gif. >=== -fmt cleanup
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 01/26/2023 (Thu) 18:54:19.
175 posts and 114 images omitted.
>>39381 That's fine then. Please send us a resize and we'll get it up there. Regarding a Renaissance -type theme, if you do go with a baroque font, I'd suggest going all in with it. Really curly w/ lots of flourishes! :^) >>39384 Neat! I like it, Mechnomancer. Good idea. One thing: can you make the font larger/more-readable somehow? I think that would make your banner 'read' better with just a glance (which is how these things usually go).
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 06/16/2025 (Mon) 02:11:17.
>>39414 Done.
Open file (73.82 KB 300x100 SPUD bananr v2.png)
>>39397 ok text is now a bigga
>>39429 Done.

Open file (380.52 KB 512x512 1 (25).png)
Open file (359.76 KB 512x512 1 (58).png)
Open file (360.42 KB 512x512 1 (62).png)
Open file (330.60 KB 512x512 1 (93).png)
Open file (380.42 KB 512x512 1 (104).png)
AI Robowaifu Art and References ** SoaringMoon 11/25/2022 (Fri) 06:43:32 No.17763 [Reply] [Last]
I generated a whole much of neat images with Stable Diffusion 1.6. Enjoy. You are free to use the for whatever. >OP images are my five favorite of the bunch. Some proportions are off obviously. < "a robowaifu with [color] hair, digital painting, trending on artstation" Was the generation phrase. --- >Sorry to spoil all your files, rather than just the one (w/ Lynxchan it's all or nothing after the fact). The Problem Glasses are a Leftist dog-whistle that is rather distasteful around here (and also a red-flag). Certainly not something we would want to look at year-after-year in the catalog. Hope you understand, OP. ** Probably best to limit it to image generation, but also tolerating clips. Anything more advanced goes into the current propaganda thread : (>> TBD) . >=== -edit subject -add footnote -temp. locked to abate derailment => reverted
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 05/01/2025 (Thu) 00:24:55.
310 posts and 564 images omitted.
Open file (1.54 MB 1024x1024 00074-2696139488.png)
Would a robot waifu spoil your artificially womb-grown son? Would it be necessary for your son to experience true adversity and have to purchase thier own waifu bot to gain the understanding that the world doesn't care for him to truly appreciate a robot waifus' love? I'm looking into a future where young men don't have to be self concious because they lack traits that traditionally allow them to find a human partner. That prospect, while real to us, may be alien to future generations of men who never had to overcome that adversity.
>>38047 Have them work customer service for a year as a right of passage, that'll knock the rose-tinted glasses off real quick.
>>38048 I've been discussing the topic at length with GPT to see if I can ground my thoughts on the matter. Instead, I've just ventured down a philisophical rabbit hole. The general sentiment of the AI (one that I share) is that adversity for adversity's sake isn't necessarily beneficial. I'm not better than the boomers that came before me that insist If I'm not "working hard", I'm a failure. While there can be value from labor, labor, unto itself, does not have an inherent value outside that which we assign (an arbitrary metric). GPT gave me this slop for your response- "Fair point. There’s value in learning that the world doesn’t revolve around you. But if we’re just tossing people into the grinder and calling it ‘growth,’ we’re not forging character—we’re just toughening hides. Growth requires not just adversity, but reflection, community, and space to process it." A point I'd argued with GPT regarding my skepticism of assigning a bot to a child during their development was thus- "While there will be plenty of guardrails, I can see humanoid bots being the "universal distraction" for the lazy parent, not having the patience to attend to a child and assigning the bot to the child the same way modern humans hand off tablets to their toddlers."
Wrong thread, Anons (let's try >>106, or even /meta). This topic has zero to do with generating/sharing AI art.
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 04/30/2025 (Wed) 16:57:13.
Open file (1.43 MB 720x1280 1749878600158971.mp4)
Found this in a now defunct /r9k/ thread

Open file (51.12 KB 256x256 ClipboardImage.png)
Lemon Cookie EnvelopingTwilight##AgvQjr 04/28/2025 (Mon) 21:51:57 No.37980 [Reply]
The original thread can be found here: https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/595.html --- Welcome to the Lemon Cookie thread, The goal of Lemon Cookie is to create a framework where a synthetic "mind and soul" can emerge through a "LLM as cognitive architecture" approach. This thread exists to collect feedback, ask for help & to document my progress. First I am going to try to give a high level overview of how this cognitive architecture is envisioned and the ideas behind it. I have spent time looking at cognitive architecture work, in the field there is now a consensus on how the mind works at a high level. An important mechanism is a "whiteboard", basically a global temporary memory that all the other systems read in and out of. Then there is different long-term memory systems that react to and add content to the whiteboard. Along with memory pattern matcher(s)/rules work on the content of the whiteboard. A key thing to consider is the difference in philosophy that cognitive architecture projects have, the intelligence is considered to emerge from the entire system. Compare this to LLM agent work where it's considered the intelligence is the LLM. My feelings on the general LLM space are conflicted, I am both amazed and really disappointed. LLMs possess an incredible level of flexibility, world knowledge and coherence. But everything outside of the model is stagnant. It's endless API wrappers & redundant frameworks all slight permutations on RAG & basic tool calling. I will believe that LLMs are misused as chatbots, simply put their pattern matching and associative power is constrained by chat format and shallow tooling. In the Lemon Cookie Cognitive Architecture so far here are the important aspects: 1. Memory is difficult. I do not think there is a singular data structure or method that is able to handle it all, several distinct types of memory will be needed. So far I plan for a PathRAG like system and a "Triadic Memory" inspired system for external associations (this is missing in most LLM solutions). 2. LLM as Kernel, The LLM's context window is the Whiteboard and has a REPL like mechanism. It holds structured data and logic in scripting-like format so it's both LLM & Human readable while staying easy to parse & allows for expressive structured data. The LLM's role will be to decompose data and make patterns and associations explicit as executable statements. 3. The language has to be LLM/CogArch-centric. There is a thousand ""agents"" that give LLMs a python interpreter as a tool. The two need to be more tightly coupled. Scripted behavior via pattern matching, The whiteboard is a bag of objects, this allows for programmable pattern matching (think functional programming like Haskell). It's also important to allow the LLM to observe code execution and to be able to modify state and execution flow. Data in languages have scoping rules, so should LLM context. Etc... I will go into more depth about the language in another post. 4. Another important system is the "GSR" Generative Sparse Representation and it will be a first class language & runtime type, This also needs its own post. But in general I am inspired by two things, "Generative FrameNet" paper where an LLM & an embedding model is used to automatically construct new FrameNet frames. The second source is "Numenta's SDRs"/"Sparse distributed memory" this representation has a lot of useful properties for memory (Please watch the videos under the "What the hell is an SDR?" segment in my links list for an easy introduction.) I think SDR unions & SDR noise tolerance will be especially useful. 5. A custom model, For all of the above to work well, a model will need to be fine tuned with special behaviors. I do want input on this. Baking facts & behaviors into LLM weights is costly, creating bloated models that are hard to run or train (why memorize all the capitals?), while letting authors gatekeep truth and impose "safety" detached from context. Blocking role-play "violence" or intimacy isn't protection: it's authors hijacking your AI companion to preach at you. Externalizing behaviors via whiteboard pattern matching shifts control: stabbing you in-game can be funny, but a robot wielding a knife isn't. Maybe you want intimacy privately, but don't want your AI flirting back at your friends. When put together I think this will be able to host a kind of synthetic "soul", In a living being what we call a personality is the accumulated associations, learned behaviors, beliefs and quirks molded by a unique set of experiences. I hope this will be true for this system too.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

7 posts and 4 images omitted.
I found this paper on "control vectors". These, as I understand it, takes the LLM and focuses it into paths you want. After these things are huge and if you can get the LLM to concentrate in the direction you want that would be a big step. So I had some comments on how to big picture make, or a start, to get them to do this BUT write the control vectors based on your verbal , or txt, interactions with the LLM. Anyways it might be something to think about. Training these to do exactly what we want, and not what we don't want, is, I think, a big hurdle. So as a part of the language have hooks for control vectors. >>31242
>>39159 I finished the paper. Ehhhhh, it looks good and bad at the same time. I think it got some good big picture stuff but I'm not sure about the rest. Though I must admit much of the last of it is above my head. One thing I really, really think is if it is at all possible you should find some language that you can use the already built in resources to define things needed in your language instead of writing your own you will be way ahead of the game. There's just too damn much detail to write this stuff from scratch. An example of biting off more than you can chew. I think a huge problem with Red Programming language is that he decided to write it such that the OS GUI functions were to be based on the different libraries on each different OS instead of using the already done GUI called VID. VID could have been modded to make it a little more modern looking without too much trouble. I mentioned this and I think it really pissed him off, but I think I was right. There's just to damn much in the various OS's GUI libraries to wade through it all AND write a whole new Rebol at the same time. I think this held him up a great deal. My thinking was if you could bootstrap the present GUI, then, later you could always add in the GUI based solely on the individual OS's GUI libraries. The way Rebol is set up it would just be a plug in.
>>39162 >>AI research paper >Impressive. Please note the paper is not serious, I literally just wanted to share some AI output that came out ok. >>39223 >I finished the paper. Ehhhhh, it looks good and bad at the same time. I think it got some good big picture stuff but I'm not sure about the rest. Though I must admit much of the last of it is above my head. Thats the feeling I got from it too, Its good, but its also bad lol. I am amazed that it got the big picture and generated something so coherent, A year ago no LLM closed or open, framework or not would produce something of this quality. But there is also lots of gaps plainly visible. Don't take this PDF as actual plans, I just posted it for fun. ---- >>39162 >Am I understanding you rightly, Anon? If so wow that's a serious undertaking. Yes, but is it really such a big undertaking? I feel like most programmers eventually get the itch to do so, usually as a toy or some sort of DSL. In this case, it's a DSL, it's not replacing any of the systems level code, that is still being written in D and I am still using C & C++ libraries. >>39221 I am aware of NIM, it was one of the languages I ran into before I settled for D, I liked what I saw and if I was looking for a system language it would be high up on my list. I don't think it would make a good embedded scripting type language. >Now if this guy, wonderbrain, has trouble with C++ then, I have no hope. I come from C++, the reason I switched is because I do this as a hobby and I am a solo developer, so my productivity is the most important metric. C++ while powerful, I found to be more of a footgun to me. I spent more time then I wanted dealing with memory & lifetime issues, horrid cmake build scripts and etc... Because I am not a part of a team or have any obligations to make my self replaceable. I decided to move to something that makes me happier. I pick D because its like if C++ had nicer syntax, nicer templates & a garbage collector.
>>39228 >I literally just wanted to share some AI output that came out ok. Got it. I found that impressive. The claim "muh half the research papers today are written by AI!111" from neo-Luddites what a term :D may be partly-true soon. :^) <---> >Yes, but is it really such a big undertaking? Maybe its just """me and my fast-lightnin' mind""" talking, but yes, it certainly seems so to me personally. Given the literal multiple-trillions being spent yearly today on this general domain, I think market & economic pressures would've already arrived at effective solutions decades ago if it were a 'simple' thing. :^) >In this case, it's a DSL, it's not replacing any of the systems level code, that is still being written in D and I am still using C & C++ libraries. Good thinking. That's on a much-more feasible scale for a talented individual, I think. I myself hope to create a DSL wrapper of sorts for RW Foundations code: primarily as a way to ease/ensure-effective-support-for safe, standardized & encompassing scripting interfaces to our robowaifus (for a variety of other languages like, eg, Python & Lua). Kind of a Scripting Abstraction Layer over the underlying Executive/C4 realtime systems code. I predict this can eventually even be extended out to providing realworld, 'embodied' interfaces for LLMs, STT<->TTS, OpenCV, etc., into our robowaifus. :^) <---> >I really do hope that my choice of D does not upset him too much, I understand why he picks C++. Lol, no not at all. Though it is a bit discouraging to me that after almost a decade's dedicated-effort on my part trying to help newcomers here to learn the language, I still dont have.a.single. regular C++ collaborator here on /robowaifu/ with me. Literally no takers at all, by appearances. I'm sure RW Foundations would be vastly-further along today if someone (even just one complete beginner; b/c it would've kept me motivated) had been working closely with me on it for say, a couple years now. Eventually, I just got burnt out by the discouragement + the pressures of full-time student life (3rd degree's -worth in a row, so far). BUT... I haven't abandoned the RW framework itself! Just the fruitless "C++ language-teaching" part. (Grommet won -- his 'muh_anything_but_C++' niggerpilling beat me in the end...) LOL. JK, no it didn't! :D Hopefully I can find the internal motivation and pick it all back up again soon ... -ish. :^)
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 06/14/2025 (Sat) 01:29:18.
>>39225 I wrote this right as the site went down and saved it local. >I don't make fun of C++ developers Making it clear. I'm not in any way doing this. I'm saying that it's too hard for me and I believe for most people this is true. I'm not capable of making progress with C++. Any other language is difficult enough. >Please note the paper is not serious I fully get that. I hope your endeavors are successful. I do think writing a new language is going to take a long time but, if it amuses you then that's all that matters. It's not a contest. I do think though that it will be really hard to write something from scratch. The reason I advocate for this or that is not so much cheerleader but that I hope people of better ability than me at this, not difficult, will pick a language that I think they will make rapid progress. I know this may sound stupid but it is exactly what I'm trying to convey. Of course I could be wrong. I don't know anything about D, maybe I should. I'll look it up. (I did look at it) ehhh, from what I read Nim might be better though I obviously am not qualified to say. >NIM, it was one of the languages I ran into before I settled for D, I liked what I saw and if I was looking for a system language it would be high up on my list. I don't think it would make a good embedded scripting type language

Message too long. Click here to view full text.


Open file (5.57 KB 256x104 FusionPower.jpg)
Open file (37.68 KB 256x146 WiafuBattery.jpg)
Open file (124.55 KB 850x1512 SolarParasol.jpg)
Open file (144.39 KB 850x1822 GeneratorWaifu.jpg)
Power & Energy Robowaifu Technician 04/25/2025 (Fri) 22:16:32 No.37810 [Reply] [Last]
Power & Energy Robots require some form of energy to power them. We need to understand how to store energy in a way that will provide her with all the power she’ll need. To clarify, “energy” is a system's capacity to do work over time. This is measured by Wh, or Watt hour. Closely related is “power” the rate at which work is done. This is measured as W, or watts. As an example, we could have a robot with a 80Wh Lithium Ion battery and two DC gear motors that consume 10W when working. You do not need to rely solely on batteries and motors. We can use other methods of storing energy. This can include compressed fluids, thermal energy, and light, among other things. For instance, glow in the dark paint is useful for storing energy to use at night for safety. Solar panels or a generator can provide power through the energy of long distance nuclear fusion or extracting energy from some reaction. Being part of a robot means we need to consider safety, mass, and volume. How will her energy and power system fit inside her? How will she deal with the mass? What happens when she runs out of energy? How can you minimize her energy use? What alternatives can be used to lower her cost of production and ownership? These rhetorical questions are all important when contemplating how to build a robot.
200 posts and 54 images omitted.
Turn weaknesses into strengths: Batteries are quite heavy. So use them for counterweights in designs.
>>38276 Good idea, Anon. @Kiwi was promoting a 'swinging, inverted pendulum' counterweight balance system for natural bipedal gaits here on the board. Your idea of using the dense batteries for such a mass-as-pendulum is a good one. Cheers, GreerTech. :^)
>>38970 They are slowly making these better and better. At some point the cost will be so low a lot more things will go full electric.
>>39226 Agreed. Can't wait! :^)

Open file (74.27 KB 250x203 SuperBallBot.jpg)
Open file (27.43 KB 213x250 TensegritySkeleton.jpg)
Open file (12.22 KB 250x250 RubberBandTensegrity.jpg)
Tensegrity Kiwi 04/22/2025 (Tue) 18:29:41 No.37672 [Reply] [Last]
Tensegrity Thread Tenssegrity is the purposeful application of tension in a system of non-contact components to provide integrity. These components effectively float on compression provided by tension elements. Tensegrity structures are often formed via rigid rods with a cable defining the spatial relations of the system. Picrel 1 is NASA’s Super Ball Bot, which uses the common 6 bar structure. By altering the lengths of the rods, the “ball” can roll. Please see (https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/super-ball-bot/) Our bodies use tensegrity to provide us with incredible strength, durability, and adaptability. Consider how when you bump into something or fall, you can feel the pressure dissipate throughout large parts of your body. This is due to your muscles, fascia, ligaments, etc… transferring the force throughout your body, protecting the impacted part. You can walk with little effort thanks in part to tensegrity. Your legs joints are all floating, providing low friction movement while distributing the force of impact throughout your entire leg when you step. Please see (http://intensiondesigns.ca/geometry-of-anatomy/) Tensegrity can also be made with elastic elements. These structures are what I believe are best suited for our endeavors. They provide looser tolerance requirements and give her body some squeezability. By incorporating naturally stretchable elements, she can better withstand having an Anon using her. (I speak from experience, though I still broke that torso before taking pictures.) Though there are drawbacks. These designs are deceptively difficult to design correctly. Our requirements for external aesthetics provide unique design requirements that complicate the design phase. I still believe using this concept is objectively correct for us to pursue. A good example to build off of (Debatable whether or not it’s true tensegrity): https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4182634
92 posts and 50 images omitted.
Open file (12.69 KB 480x360 hqdefault (1).jpg)
>>39141 Speaking of Futurama...
>>39142 Lol. I don't recall seeing that one! :D
Open file (74.70 KB 1500x1500 cheap.jpg)
Open file (5.04 KB 134x67 tighter weave.png)
Open file (3.92 KB 150x53 crisscross.png)
>>39139 The cheaper tubes might use a poorer quality epoxy. There are no also listed msi ratings, so they are probably a made with a week low modulus fiber. The orientation and alternation of the wraps would also be a factor. The Amazon ones look to be made from tube a of loose twill weave. The three McMaster Car options have different materials. One has all the fibbers running in a single direction, one with a tighter weave, and the last has crisscrossed alternating wraps with a much high modulus fiber. >>39142 >>39143 Curse you merciful Poseidon!
Open file (42.74 KB 400x335 broken arrow.jpg)
>>39145 Their pictures are terrible, but the last McMaster Car's last option is probably similar in construction to a fancy fishing rod blank. The first option probably would be a bad choice as its outer layer could potentially splinter into sharp needle-like fragments.
>>39146 This is a good point. And thanks for the reminder! I'll plan to use a safety box around when doing the skellington failure tests! Cheers. :^)

Privacy, Safety, & Security General Robowaifu Technician 04/20/2021 (Tue) 20:05:08 No.10000 [Reply] [Last]
This thread is for discussion, warnings, tips & tricks all related to robowaifu privacy, safety & security. Or even just general computing safety, particularly if it's related to home networks/servers/other systems that our robowaifus will be interacting with in the home. <---> /robowaifu/ 's standard regarding a robowaifu's physical safety : ( >>38561 ). --- > thread-related (>>1671) >=== -update OP -broaden thread subject -add crosslink -add safety-standard crosslink
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 05/17/2025 (Sat) 07:14:57.
198 posts and 29 images omitted.
>>39030 I agree wholeheartedly, but it probably won't shut anybody down.
>>39030 Make them look bad to who? The audience largely sucks too. Most people in the West are no different from feminists in their level of hypocrisy or dishonesty. At most these others pursue different goals, and will not be persuaded to dislike feminists due to feminists being shown to be hypocritical because they themselves are the same. And more to the point, Westerners generally agree with feminist ideas even if they don't identify as feminists because feminism is so ingrained in Western culture that many core feminist ideas are now considered the core ideas of Western culture. Ideas that originated with the feminist movement are no longer recognized as such because they've been normalized through decades of propaganda, or else people are simply apathetic to the problems feminism causes because they think they aren't affected (yes, there are still plenty of people who are this stupid even after years of woke). Cuckservatives are completely onboard with every feminist policy that matters, including the prohibition of robowaifus. We have very little in the way of a potential audience that might be remotely sympathetic.
>>39032 I wouldn't be completely blackpilled, there are many zoomers who would agree with our mission
>>39032 The moment one of the robowaifus can show benefits to mentally ill homeless veterans we have an "in" The number 1 rule in American politics is "never insult the military" if these can provide help for our fallen heros discarded by the system it will be hard for anyone opposing the technology not to look like shit.
>>39034 >The number 1 rule in American politics is "never insult the military" Maybe 30 years ago. Feminists will happily discard this if it suits them, and they won't suffer political consequences for doing so because younger generations don't really respect the military.

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms
Delete
Report